원문 보기
Silver ended 2025 near $71 an ounce. On January 29th, it touched 121. Today, it's around 61. The whole spike is gone plus a little more, and it happened while inflation ran at 3.7%. The national debt went past $40 trillion, and Treasury yields climbed to levels we haven't seen since 2007. That last part doesn't fit.
Silver is supposed to be what you hold when the currency, the debt, and inflation are all going the wrong way. All three are going the wrong way, and silver is down almost 50% from its peak. So, what is it actually reacting to? Mostly one man, Kevin Warsh, the Fed chair who spent about a decade as a partner at Stanley Druckenmiller's family office.
Over the past 5 weeks, Druckenmiller has said several things about the Fed, the Treasury, and the bond market that silver owners should hear. I don't think his name is the reason to listen, though. He's describing the mechanism that has been pushing your metal down, and there are four specific events before October ends that could confirm it or break it.
First, where the damage started. On January 30th, President Trump announced Warsh as his pick to run the Fed. Silver had hit its record the day before at the end of a parabolic run that followed a 135% gain in 2025. Within hours, it fell roughly 30%, its worst single day since 1980. Gold, at one point, was down about 10%.
The obvious explanation was that Warsh has a reputation as an inflation hawk. A hawk at the Fed suggests a stronger dollar and higher rates, and metals that pay you nothing don't do well in that world. That story was always a little too tidy, though. By several accounts, the crash also involved forced selling.
The exchange had raised margin requirements on silver futures 2 days earlier, and when you do that to a market that has just doubled, people who borrowed own it have to sell whether they want to or not. Warsh was the trigger, but leverage did a lot of the work, and silver came back. It was near 78 by mid-March, and it was still in the high 60s a few weeks ago, even though Warsh had been confirmed and sworn in on May 22nd.
So, if the nomination alone was the problem, why did the metal recover? And why is it sliding again now? My read is that in January, the market was reacting to what Warsh might do. Now, it's reacting to what he did. On September 16th, the Fed raised its policy rate a quarter point to a range of 3.75 to 4%.
It was the first hike since July 2023, and the vote was unanimous. Warsh said inflation is too high and has been for too long. 16 committee members projected at least one more hike before the year ends. Warsh didn't submit a projection himself, which says something about how he views telling people what the Fed will do.
That's a big part of what's different about this Fed. Warsh doesn't want to give markets a road map. At Jackson Hole on August 28th, he said the Fed shouldn't be the place traders look to for their next trade. He named the gauge he'll act on, core PCE. He noted that inflation has been above target for 65 straight months, and that price stability doesn't take care of itself.
He also said money matters, a phrase that hasn't been fashionable inside the Fed for a long time. Silver fell about 4% that day. On the day of the hike it fell another three and a half. This is the part I think people miss. And it's where Druckenmiller becomes useful. On September 10th, at a Piper Sandler conference, he said Fed officials who keep calling the current rate restrictive are ridiculous.
His evidence wasn't a model. He said to look at asset prices around the world. Restrictive is supposed to mean the rate is high enough to slow borrowing and cool demand. The Fed's rate is just under 4%. Headline inflation is 3.7% and core is about 3.3. After inflation, that leaves somewhere between zero and half a percent, depending on which gauge you use.
It's hard to call that a break. Warsh appears to agree. He has described financial conditions as not restrictive. And the market took that as the tell. If the Fed itself thinks it has barely tightened, the September hike looks like the start of something. Two caveats about Druckenmiller. He has said he's no longer allowed to talk to Warsh, though he still calls him one of his closest friends and a great Fed chair.
So he isn't passing along inside information. He's a very good investor whose thinking overlaps with the person running the Fed. And I couldn't find anything showing he has taken a public position on silver. Earlier this year, he said he owns some gold, mostly as a geopolitical hedge, and that he was bearish on the dollar.
So I wouldn't read his name as a signal about your silver. I'd read it as a window into how the Fed is likely to think about rates. Now, why does silver care about any of this? Silver pays no interest and a Treasury bond does. When the bond pays more, holding silver costs more in income you give up.
The number that matters isn't the headline yield, though. It's the yield after inflation, the real yield, which you can read straight off inflation-protected Treasuries. They pay a fixed rate on top of whatever inflation turns out to be. On September 21st, the 10-year real yield was about 2.6%. By Friday the 25th, it was 2.83.
That's a large move for 1 week, and it puts the real yield at its highest in roughly 18 years. Compare that with the ordinary 10-year yield. It ended last week around 5.7%, the highest since 2007, and the 30-year reached 5.495-year high. Nearly all of that increase was real yield. The market's 10-year inflation expectation barely moved and has been sitting near 2.3%.
That changes how the whole story reads. If you own silver because you expect governments to inflate away their debts, you'd expect that worry to show up in inflation expectations. It hasn't. The bond market isn't pricing debasement. It's pricing a central bank that is finally serious and a Treasury that has to pay more to borrow.
Silver struggles in that environment, even when inflation is high and the debt is huge. The bond market has said something else, too, and it's where Druckenmiller's sharpest comments come in. On August 19th, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, whom Druckenmiller once mentored, doubled the cap on long-term bond buybacks from $2 billion to $4 billion per operation.
The stated goal was to support the market for older long bonds. Long yields dipped briefly, then reversed and climbed back above 5.2%. Druckenmiller wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed calling it price management rather than liquidity management and a mistake much larger than $4 billion suggests. He argued the market wasn't frozen.
Trading was orderly, volatility was contained, and no auctions had failed. His best line, I thought, was that you can't buy your way out of a solvency conversation with liquidity tools. You can only postpone it and raise the eventual price. In his view, the bond market is one of the last things forcing Washington to look at its deficit, which is projected to top $2 trillion this year.
Suppress the market and the pressure goes away. Let it speak and borrowing gets more expensive and the deficit gets harder to ignore. Bessent's defenders have a fair answer. Treasury never defended a specific yield. The 30-year went right back to where it had been and Treasury let it. Real price management would involve a target and a promise to buy until you hit it, and there was neither.
That's worth remembering before you decide Treasury is quietly capping the market. Here's the connection to silver. The strongest bullish case for precious metals has always been fiscal dominance. A government too indebted to tolerate high rates leans on its central bank, holds rates down, and lets inflation do the work.
That's the version where silver goes vertical, and it depends on the central bank giving in. Warsh's Fed hasn't given in. It's raising rates into an oil shock with crude above $100 because of the disruption around the Strait of Hormuz. And Warsh said at his press conference that the Fed can't do anything about that particular problem.
The 1970s Fed is remembered for going easy on an energy shock, and this one is doing the opposite. So, the market isn't saying the metals thesis is dead. It's saying the event that would set it off hasn't happened. You could argue silver should hold up whatever the Fed does. So, let's look at the metal itself.
The Silver Institute expects a sixth straight annual deficit in 2026, about 40 6 million oz, which means the world uses more silver than it mines and recycles. That's real. But, total demand is over a billion oz, so the gap is around 4% of the market. And the biggest industrial buyer, solar, is using less silver per panel because high prices forced manufacturers to economize.
Solar demand is expected to fall about 19% this year, and industrial demand overall is expected to slip. So, the deficit matters, but it can't set the price alone. At the margin, the price comes from investors and traders, especially in futures, which is how January happened. A small physical shortfall combined with a lot of speculative money can produce a 30% day.
Then, there's the gold-silver ratio at about 68. The long-run average around 60. When rate expectations rise, silver usually falls harder than gold, and it has. Gold is down about a quarter from its January record near 5,600. Silver is down nearly half. History is tempting here, so I want to be careful with it.
In 1980, silver peaked near $50 in January and fell to roughly 11 by the end of March, while Paul Volcker was pushing rates to extreme levels. A silver owner watching a hawkish Fed could easily think it's 1980 again. The match is looser than it looks. Inflation back then was in the double digits, and the Fed's rate went well above it.
Today, the policy rate sits only a little above inflation. The 1980 collapse also involved one enormous leveraged position, the Hunt brothers, getting squeezed after the exchanges changed the rules. What carries over is narrower. Silver's worst crashes tend to come when high real rates and heavy leverage show up together.
We had the leverage in January, and the rates are arriving now. What's the best argument against the bearish reading? Start with the fact that the Fed is hiking into an oil shock. If higher rates weaken hiring while energy keeps prices up, the hikes could turn out to be a mistake. Real yields would fall as the market prices in a slowdown, and silver tends to rally hard when that happens.
Then there's how much is already priced in. Silver is down about half from its peak and 14% on the year, and markets put roughly two in three odds on an October hike and around 90% on one by December. With expectations that lopsided, metals don't need the Fed to turn dovish. They only need it to tighten a bit less than feared.
And the physical market isn't loose. Coin and bar demand is forecast to rise 18% this year. The counterpoint is that big moves in real yields often run longer than people expect, especially when the Central Bank believes it hasn't tightened much yet. I lean toward that view for the next few weeks with real yields staying the main pressure on silver, but I'm holding it loosely.
Markets can flip on one data point. And Warsh has made clear he won't warn anyone before he changes course. Which brings us to the title. Is there anything special about October? Not really. But the next four weeks contain a few specific events that will tell us whether this reading holds up. The first was August PCE on September 30th, the inflation gauge Warsh says he acts on.
Economists expected headline near 3.7% and core around 3.3. The number is out by the time you're watching, so compare it with those forecasts. A big miss in either direction is already your first update. The second is Friday, October 2nd, the September jobs report. Forecasters expect roughly 90 to 100,000 new jobs, well below last month's 162,000, with unemployment near 4.1%.
Warsh says the labor side of the Fed's job is in good shape. A soft number gives the committee a reason to wait, and a strong one next to hot inflation makes an October hike hard to avoid. The third is September CPI on October 14th, the last major inflation reading before the meeting. The fourth is the Fed decision on October 28th, when we find out whether the second hike arrives, and whether Warsh delivers it with the same silence about what comes next.
Under all four, I'd watch two numbers rather than the silver price. One is the 10-year real yield, which was 2.83% last Friday. The other is the 10-year break-even inflation rate near 2.3. If real yields keep rising with break-evens flat, the market still believes in a serious Fed, and silver's headwind continues.
If break-evens start climbing, the market is starting to doubt the Fed, and that's the first sign the old metals thesis is waking up. If real yields drop because growth cracks, that's another road to relief. Either would break the bearish reading. Keep an eye on oil, too. While the Strait of Hormuz stays disrupted, the Fed keeps hiking against something it can't fix, and the bond market keeps testing it.
And watch long bond auctions and any further Treasury buybacks. Druckenmiller's argument implies that's where a standoff between Washington and the bond market would show up first. So, where does that leave us? The Fed hiked on September 16th, and its chair says inflation comes first. Policy isn't restrictive, and he won't announce his next move.
10- year real yields are at their highest in almost two decades, while inflation expectations have hardly moved, and silver has dropped alongside them. Druckenmiller, whose views overlap with Warsh's without being his voice, thinks rates are too low, and the bond market should be left alone. What nobody knows is whether the Fed can hold this line if hiring weakens and oil stays over $100 or whether higher real yields are the final word or just a chapter.
We also don't know what Druckenmiller [clears throat] holds in silver, if anything. His filings only show June. Silver isn't falling because inflation disappeared or the debt shrank. It's falling because the most important central bank in the world has started paying people to hold something other than metal and the metals long-term case depends on that reversing.
Whether it does will depend more on the bond market's patience and the Fed's than on anything happening in silver itself. If you want to follow the real yield, the break even, and the October decision as they move, subscribe. That's where this story goes next.
Comments 0