people장 홈📈 Stock Masters주식 유튜브를 Articles로 읽고 Author의 예측을 실제 가격으로 확인합니다 people장 Board 홈요청하기

한국어 · English

Bull Bullish · DB Calls 기준 · 금

피터시프

Accuracy score-1.8
순 place179
Scored calls1346 calls
Hit rate / Market-adjusted / Return-weighted42.9% / 50.2% / 40.8%
1-month return / Market / beta excess return / Peer excess-1.4% / -1.0% / -0.6
Bullish / Bearish / Neutral41.0% / 41.5% / 17.5%
Best horizon1d
Performance badgeLate call badge,Inverse badge
Main channelPlain Finance Reborn
국적외
Note
Updated2026-10-28 07:00:00

Main stocks: #금 (656)#미국채금리 (648)#미국기술주 (432)#BTC (272)#S&P500 (256)

How scores are calculated

"It's Going To Get WORSE..." — Peter Schiff's Urgent 2026 Warning (The Final Collapse)

Business Upside · 2026-10-27 · 유튜브 시청 1,321 · Board Views 0 · International

International

유튜브 썸네일

원문 보기

다듬은 글 보기

Gold is currently meeting serious support in the 4000 area . If not this year, then next year gold will cost $6,000. I think silver and its dynamics look very confident. It's unlikely that silver will fall to 50, but I doubt anyone will be able to buy it for less than 50 again . I think anything below 60 is probably a pretty good price to buy silver.

The Fed's failure to raise rates, or even the first hike, could be a catalyst. Why didn't they raise the stakes at the first meeting if they were so determined? Why is the balance sheet still expanding? Why is the money supply increasing? Bitcoin has somewhat overshadowed gold and taken some of the attention away from it.

There are many negative campaigns against gold. This could have affected potential buyers who, you know, don't see the real value. You know, I do n't hear people say, "Well, gold is useless. "Gold, you know, is just perception." Central banks have a very low percentage of their reserves in gold. There is currently no great demand for gold as a reserve asset.

I think demand is growing because central banks are not investing enough in gold. They have too much fiat money on their balance sheets. We rocketed up, then fell back down with a thud . I think that really undermined the enthusiasm or the positive sentiment that was in the gold market at the end of that rally.

And I believe that we have returned to the same negative sentiment that defined the entire market up until that point. People are very negative about gold right now, but it has obviously run ahead. Silver broke out above 50 and went to 120, after sitting around 30 for a couple of years. So it overheated.

I think all the noise in the Persian Gulf on the eve of the war with Iran—it was obvious that something was going to happen. This also fueled interest in buying gold. Therefore, it had rapid growth. And when the war began, the principle of " buy on rumors, sell on facts" came into play, because this had already been taken into account.

And this started the correction. And then we heard supposedly “ hawkish” comments from Kevin Warsh, the new Fed chairman, about how aggressively they would fight to get back to 2% inflation. Um, and now the market, you could say, has switched from expecting two or three rate cuts to expecting two or three rate increases.

This also put significant pressure on gold. Markets have reacted to the headlines, but institutional positioning tells a much less obvious story. Peter Schiff notes that sentiment has changed dramatically, but emotional swings often peak when prices have already adjusted to geopolitical risks. Investors who chase central bank rhetoric rather than liquidity conditions often sell assets at support levels, missing opportunities.

Peter Schiff goes on to explain why the market's confidence in aggressive monetary tightening may be at odds with what policymakers can realistically deliver. This also pushed the dollar up. Um, now you know, I think it just created a good buying opportunity. I believe the market is pricing in rate cuts that are unlikely to actually happen.

And even if they do happen , it will be with inflation much higher than the current one. So the real rates will actually be lower. And the real stakes are much more important. In fact, in many cases, nominal rates don't matter. Real rates are all that matters. And so real rates will be much lower, even if the Fed raises nominal rates a little.

So, I think the idea that we're going to crush gold with tight monetary policy like under Paul Volcker is not going to happen. You know, I think we're headed for a significant increase in the price of gold. The question is, when will this consolidation end? Gold is currently finding serious support around 4000.

It trades just below this level, but not by much, and then turns back up. So, this could be a new base. We couldn't secure the base at 5,000, but we had a base at 3,000, a base at 2,000. 4,000 looks like a pretty solid base, and we'll make another push to 5,000, and I'm confident we'll surpass that high.

If not this year, then next year we will see gold at $6,000. I think this is a fairly likely course of events. Yes, many investment banks essentially have the same price target. If inflation remains high and interest rates lag behind it, purchasing power imperceptibly decreases, even as markets celebrate.

According to Peter Schiff, real interest rates weigh much more heavily than policy announcements because they determine whether wealth is actually being preserved. When inflation outpaces interest rates, cash and fixed-income savings lose value in real terms, even if the nominal return looks positive.

Over the long term, this gradual erosion can have a greater impact on wealth than short-term market volatility. This is why many long-term investors pay more attention to real returns than to individual betting decisions. They argue that preserving purchasing power ultimately depends on whether returns exceed inflation, not simply on the level of interest rates.

This is the distinction that many investors ignore , focusing on every phrase the Fed says. Peter Schiff goes on to reveal an overlooked relationship between real returns and gold's long-term performance, something Wall Street rarely emphasizes. Come on, let's just assume that 4000 is the new base, like you said.

I would be happy with this as a sort of launching pad for further price records. And do you see the same thing with silver? Yes, I think the dynamics of silver look very strong. I mean, silver is unlikely to go back to 50. I think that was resistance from the 20th and from 1980 to 2021, and it really hung over the market for a long time.

And when we finally got over it, we just jumped a lot. But I doubt people will have a chance to buy below 50 again. I think anything below 60 is probably a pretty good buy for silver. You know, it's a little bit above 60 again now, but I mean it was trading, I think the lowest I saw it was around 56 something.

But I don't expect silver to go back below 50. I think that would be too good a buying opportunity for those who missed it. So, I think if you're going to buy, you're going to have to overpay a little. But I think it's heading much higher. And it's not just gold and silver . You know, almost everything will become more expensive. I mean,

#금#BTC

← List으로
공유페이스북밴드

이 Articles에 대해 요청(숨김) 수정 요청

Comments 0