원문 보기
This week, one of the world's most renowned investors, Rey Dalio, has once again made headlines following statements to the Financial Times, in which he asserts that the United States is heading towards an autocracy reminiscent of the 1930s. Furthermore, according to him, the dollar's hegemony as the global reserve currency is under threat.
And there are only 3 years left before the immense US debt, which already exceeds 37 trillion dollars, explodes, causing a major global financial crisis. The question that many of you are probably asking yourselves right now is obvious. Is Daliio right this time? Or are we facing yet another one of his alarmist speeches that we have heard a thousand times and that in the end never comes true?
In this video we are going to break down one by one all the claims that Rey Dalio has made. We'll see if the United States is really moving towards an autocratic model, if the Federal Reserve is losing its independence, if the dollar is in real danger, and if, as he says, we are on the verge of an imminent debt crisis that could collapse the stock markets in the next 3 years.
Let us therefore analyze the different points that Dalio has highlighted as a warning for all investors. I'll tell you now that for the first time in a long time I agree with some of these points, and I think it's important that you keep them in mind when managing your money and investments correctly, as we'll see below.
Let's start with the first one. Is the United States heading towards an autocracy like the 1930s? Rey Delio asserts that the political and social climate in the United States is dangerously similar to that of the 1930s: extreme polarization, loss of institutional trust, and increased state control over the economy.
The main example he gives to justify this supposed autocratic drift is the recent decision by the Trump administration to take a 10% stake in a semiconductor company, Intel, something that Dio describes as a gesture typical of a strong autocratic leadership seeking to control the financial and economic situation.
But is this really a sign of autocracy? Let's put it in context. Intel is going through one of the most difficult moments in its recent history. It has lost ground to competitors such as Nvidia, AMD, and Taiwan Semiconductor. Their manufacturing technology is lagging behind, and their position in the industry is at stake.
As you can imagine, all these problems are reflected in its stock price. The company's shares have fallen 60% since 2020. It is here that the current US government has identified the semiconductor sector as strategic for economic, technological, and national security reasons and has decided to intervene in Intel, seeking to strengthen a key American company in the sector for the country's industrial sovereignty.
From my point of view, we are not talking about nationalization or forced imposition. It is a timely and strategic investment with a clear economic and geopolitical logic. And this decision is far from an autocratic model. Furthermore, comparing this to the 1930s is completely disproportionate. At that time, the United States was emerging from the Great Depression, with massive unemployment, banking collapse, and institutional chaos.
Today, although there are political tensions, democratic institutions continue to function. The economy is growing and markets are operating normally. There is polarization, yes there is populism, maybe there is too, but that does n't mean we are on the verge of an autocracy. To say that the United States is heading towards autocracy because the government invests in Intel is an exaggeration, and what's worse for me is that Dio is once again showing his eagerness to be the number one doomsayer with these speeches to try to provoke fear among investors based on his false alarmist headlines.
Having seen this and before moving on to analyze his prediction that in 3 years the debt bubble will burst in the United States collapsing the economy and the stock markets, there are two points that Daliio has commented on with which I do agree and which we must monitor. The first point refers to the independence of the Federal Reserve.
Rey Dalio warns that the Federal Reserve is losing its political independence, and the reality is that we are seeing movements that at least raise very serious doubts. To begin with, President Trump has tried to remove Lisa Cook, the Fed governor appointed by Biden, accusing her of mortgage fraud. She denies it and has taken the case to court.
The outcome is still pending, but the serious precedent that has been created has never before been seen by a president who had tried to dismiss a member of the Federal Reserve Board directly. This move has generated a lot of uncertainty in the markets, and even the president of the European Central Bank, Christine Lagart, has pointed out that this type of political action is a very serious danger to the independence of the Fed and global economic stability .
In the last two months there has also been speculation about Jerome Powell's early departure before May 2026, which would give Trump the opportunity to place a sympathetic person in the Fed chairmanship right in the middle of an election year. All of this would obviously jeopardize the credibility of the Federal Reserve as an independent institution, something that is key to maintaining confidence in the financial system and in the dollar itself.
However, all that political pressure from Trump on the Fed has led many media outlets to misinterpret even the last words at the Fed meeting in August, where it was stated that the 2% inflation target was becoming more flexible and that the Fed was yielding to political pressure to allow more inflation.
But the reality is that this is not true. What Powell said is exactly the opposite. He announced that they are abandoning the approach adopted during the pandemic, in which inflation was allowed to temporarily exceed 2% to try to make up for the years in which it had been below that level. However, the Federal Reserve is now recommitting to a more traditional approach, focused on keeping inflation under control and responding firmly if it deviates from the target.
Therefore, the 2% is not being made more flexible, but rather reaffirmed. My conclusion on this point is that if we see constant pressure from Trump and his entourage for a monetary policy more favorable to his economic vision. However, in my opinion, the Lisa Cook case could be a completely isolated incident, and at no point has the Fed abandoned its commitment to price stability.
On the contrary, Powell reinforced that message in his latest speech. Dali is right to say that we must monitor the independence of the Fed, as it is very important, but as he usually does, he mixes the real facts with a narrative of collapse that does not fit reality at all. The second interesting point we should analyze is, as Dalio says, whether the dollar is on the verge of collapse.
Dio has been warning for years about the loss of hegemony of the dollar. According to him, excessive debt, massive money printing, and growing international distrust of US policy are leading many countries and investors to reduce their exposure to the dollar. He even mentions that some large holders are rotating towards assets like gold.
And although this type of discourse has some logic, especially in a context of growing debt and geopolitical tensions, it again exaggerates in the outcome. It is true that many countries are looking to diversify their reserves and that the dollar has lost some ground as a reserve currency against the yuan, the euro, or even digital assets such as cryptocurrencies.
But today the dollar still represents more than 50% of world reserves and is by far the most used currency in international trade and financial markets. Now, having said that, I'll give you my opinion. What is evident, and not only for the dollar but for any fiat currency, is that they are doomed to lose value in the long term, because all governments—the United States, Europe, Japan—resort to the same mechanism: creating and printing more money to finance deficits and sustain debt.
That means the dollar is going to collapse tomorrow. Doesn't that mean that holding cash is a good long-term strategy? Neither. My advice on this point is always the same. Keep as little cash on hand as possible. In the long term, cash inevitably loses purchasing power due to the structural inflation of all monetary systems.
It is much better to be invested in real assets, especially in shares of solid, productive companies that are able to pass on inflation to their income. So while Dio has some truth to that general diagnosis, the inherent weakness of fiat money is not unique to the dollar and in no way justifies his catastrophic narrative that the system is on the verge of collapse.
And here we come to the last point, which is probably what made you click on this video. The US debt is going to explode and the stock markets will collapse in 3 years, as Dalio says. As you can imagine, Dio is playing the role of Dalio and goes into full apocalypse mode. He says that the US deficit is so large and the debt so unsustainable that we could see a kind of economic heart attack in the next 3 years.
A debt crisis that would cause a widespread fall in the markets and a total lack of confidence in the system. And it is true that the United States' fiscal deficit has grown in a completely worrying way. In 2024, the largest deficit in history outside of the COVID years was recorded, exceeding trillions of dollars.
And yes, this is a clear case of great fiscal irresponsibility, but does that mean the system is going to collapse? No, and I'll explain why. The nominal debt of the United States continues to grow and now exceeds 37 trillion dollars. However, drawing any conclusions based solely on this information would give us a somewhat incomplete view of the real financial situation in the United States.
The debt-to-GDP chart makes everything clearer. The debt is high, yes, but it is stable. In fact, it is even declining slightly relative to the size of the US economy. Because? Because the US GDP continues to grow strongly, and that's what really allows for high levels of debt to be sustained: growth.
The United States can have a deficit because it remains the most dynamic, innovative, and productive economy on the planet. It is the only country in the world that issues currency in the form of a global reserve with permanent demand for public debt from investors and central banks around the world.
Yes, obviously the deficit must be corrected and yes, they can't stretch it out forever, but that doesn't mean that in 3 years there will be a market collapse. There is no structural indicator that shows a systemic distrust in the dollar, in treasury bonds or in the economic model of the United States, much less in its stock markets.
Companies continue to generate record profits. Private investment has not stopped. There is no massive capital flight and no real signs of an imminent crisis. And here's the most important part. Rey Dalio has not been right about a single one of his predictions in the last 15 years. He has been announcing the collapse of the dollar and the system's debt for more than a decade .
Meanwhile, do you know what's happening? American stock indices have continued to rise. The SP500 has generated a total cumulative return of 476% over the last 15 years, and the Nasdaq has generated 1162%. And do you know why? Because, as Warren Buffett has always said time and time again, to achieve long-term success in the markets, doomsaying headlines are useless and macroeconomics matter much less than we think.
What should really matter to you is the quality of the companies you hold in your portfolio, the underlying economics of the businesses you invest in, not the headlines, not the forecasts, not the doomsayers, but real companies with real products that generate real cash flow and compete with lasting competitive advantages.
My advice as an investor is clear: don't invest until you're afraid. Do you understand the risks? Yes. Briefly review the macro situation. Yes, but do n't make decisions based on what the doomsayers of the day say. If you had heeded these messages in 2010, 2013, 2017, or 2020, you would have missed the biggest market opportunities.
Invest in real assets. Focus on investing in the best companies in the world at the right price. And remember, headlines are free, but bad investment decisions come at a very high price. If you don't want to fall for the fear imposed by doomsayers and their headlines, and you'd like to learn how to analyze the best businesses in the world and invest in them at the right price, I'd like to give you a completely free course of more than 10 hours.
Simply go to the description of this video and you will find a link that will redirect you to that free course where I will teach you everything from scratch. Goodbye and see you next week. I think this is the beginning of a great friendship. Subscribe to the channel and don't forget to turn on notifications so you don't miss any of our videos.
Comments 0