원문 보기
The hottest stock in America this year is a company that most people wouldn't be able to describe if you asked them. It does not produce chatbots. It doesn't make robots or rockets. It produces memory and storage chips that power artificial intelligence. The company is called Micron, and its shares have risen more than $240 this year.
Their value exceeded a trillion dollars. It bypassed Nvidia. It outperformed almost everything in the entire American market . And on July 2nd, Michael Burr, the man who predicted the 2008 housing market crash when the whole world was calling it crazy, the man they made the big short, went on his Substack and posted that he had sold Micron at $1.05187 per share.
And he didn't just quietly sell it. He called her, in his exact words, a destroyer of capital , trapped in a psychological bubble. That was 5 days ago. At the time of writing, Micron has fallen about 13% since his post. And this week, sales stopped at about one share. This spread throughout the global memory industry on both sides of the Pacific on a day when the news was actually good.
I'll explain this strange detail later, because it might be the most important thing in this entire video. But first, you need to hear the number that made Boer pull the trigger. Because inside his post is one statistic that has nothing to do with artificial intelligence, nothing to do with profits, nothing to do with position fixing, a number that goes back 42 years.
When you see him, you will understand why he chose this particular stock at this particular moment. And you will understand something more. Why the safest- looking number in Micron's profile, the one every bull is going to insert in your comments, might be the most dangerous number in the entire stock market right now.
The story of 1984, the last time this stock was stretched this far and what happened next, the trigger he named in his own post that started flashing five days later, and honest arguments for why he might completely lose this bet. Stay with me. The most important parts here are the ones no one talks about .
Let's start with what Micron does, because the whole story lives inside it. Every computer has two types of chips that matter. The processor, the brain, the Nvidia of the world, and the memory, the chips that store information and transfer it to that brain. Micron makes memory. And that's what sets memory chips apart from almost everything else in technology.
They are a commodity. One company's memory chip is largely interchangeable with another, like oil and wheat. This means that memory companies don't compete with magic. They compete on price. And their profits do not grow linearly. They move in turbulent cycles along with the price of the commodity. For 40 years, this is how Micron traded.
Boom, crash, boom, crash. Then artificial intelligence came along and sparked the biggest boom in the history of the industry. That's why. An AI data center is not just a warehouse of processors. Each of these processors requires data transfer at incredible speeds. And what powers them is a specialized product called high-bandwidth memory, HBM.
This is a premium advanced version of what Micron produces, and only three companies on the planet produce it on a large scale. Samsung and SKH Heinix in South Korea and Micron in America. Three suppliers. Infinite demand. You can guess what happened to the prices. Micron's profits exploded to record levels.
The stock rose 240% in 6 months. Wall Street stopped calling it a commodity chip maker and started calling it an artificial intelligence infrastructure company, a member of the club alongside Nvidia, a trillion-dollar valuation, the giant's best stock in the market's hottest year. Here is the scheme.
And now here's the number. In his post, Burr noted that Micron shares are trading above their own 200- day moving average, their own long-term trend line, more than at any time since 1984. Think about the size of this statement . This stock experienced a dot boom, the wildest mania in modern market history.
And it wasn't that stretched. His words, not even during the dot-com boom of 1984 . You would have to go back four decades, to the first great memory boom , to find this stock so far above its own reality. And since he mentioned 1984, let me tell you what happened after 1984. Because I promised you this story, and it's worth 30 seconds.
In the early 80s, memory chips were the hot technology of the era. During the personal computer boom, American companies dominated. Prices were high, profits were significant, and everyone was in a hurry to increase capacity. Then a wave of offers came. Japanese manufacturers have flooded the market.
Memory prices have fallen. And the crash that followed was so brutal that Intel, the most powerful chip manufacturer on Earth at the time, completely abandoned the memory business. Just left. The boom did not end with a slowdown. It ended with the industry giants fleeing the battlefield. That was the last time Micron stock was stretched as far as it is now.
This is the ghost that Boer is pointing to, because here is his second line, and that's the whole thesis in five words. Micron defined cyclicality like no other. By his count, the stock has suffered 34 separate declines of 30% or more in 42 years. 34. Write down this number. This is not a company that has a bad year every now and then.
This is a company whose stock chart is a heartbeat. Boom, bust, boom, bust every few years for four decades straight. It collapsed after 2000. It collapsed in 2008. It collapsed in 2018 and again in 2022. Every time the story was the same at the beginning. This time the demand is constant. PCs are eternal.
The Internet is eternal. The cloud is eternal. And every time the cycle would come anyway, because when memory prices are high, every manufacturer on Earth builds new factories. And two years later, all this new supply appears at the same time, and prices fall like a precipice. This is the oldest rhythm in the industry.
But he's betting he'll surpass it once again. And now the trap. And that's exactly the part I need you to hear, because that's exactly the argument you'll see everywhere in defense of these stocks. And he sounds quite reasonable. If you look at Micron shares right now, you 'll see that they don't look expensive.
They trade at about seven times earnings, based on next year's expected earnings. Seven. Nvidia trades at a multiple of this. By this number, Micron looks like a cheap AI stock, safe, valuable. Here's what four decades of investment in memory say about this number. Cyclical stocks look cheapest at the very top.
Let me explain the illusion. The price- to-earnings ratio divides the stock price by earnings. When profits reach record highs, which happen once in a generation, like now, the ratio drops and stocks look cheap. But E in this ratio is peak cyclical profit. A profit that exists because memory prices are at historic highs.
The moment the cycle turns and memory prices normalize, these profits do not fall. They sometimes fall by 80 or 90%, sometimes turn into outright losses. And stocks that looked like a bargain at seven times earnings are suddenly trading at 50 times what they actually appear to be. A cheap multiplier was never a discount .
It was a countdown. Imagine this as a farmer in a year when wheat prices triple. His income is impressive. Compared to this year's income, his farm looks like the deal of the century. But you're not buying this year. You buy every year after that. And every farmer on Earth has just planted wheat. This is Micron at a price seven times its peak earnings.
This is what Boer means by destroyer of capital. Stocks that look safest exactly when they are most dangerous. They are inviting ordinary investors with a cheap number at the top of the loudest cycle that has ever happened. So, theses need a trigger, something that tells you that a turning point is near.
And Boer named his right side in the South Korean post. Samsung and SK Heinik, the other two members of the memory triangle, have announced a major new capital expenditure plan. New factories, new capacities, new deliveries. For most of the market, this red is a surefire Storm. This is the bell at the top.
The moment each producer creates something once, the shortage begins to disappear. It's 1984 again. Again every cycle. The supply wave reaches its target in about 2 years, but the markets are not waiting for the flood. They sell when they see a cloud. And 5 days after he wrote it, the clouds appeared in the strangest way.
Samsung reported earnings this week, and the profits were record high. The best figures the company has ever printed, and the entire global memory sector jumped out of bed. When the market is healthy, record profits push stocks higher. When the market starts to fall on record profits, it means investors are no longer paying for what the company just did.
They are assessing what is coming next, and they don't like what they see. The same thing happened to Tesla last week. Delivery figures exceeded expectations. Shares fell 7%. Good news that stops working is one of the oldest top signals. The storm recorded a turn on July 2. On July 7, the tape began to agree with him, and Micron is not the only bet.
This is the latest piece of the most aggressive positioning of his post-investment career. He has short positions against Nvidia, Tesla and Applied Materials, a company that makes equipment for chip manufacturing. He sells short positions on the semiconductor index itself. And recently he did something subtle that shows how convinced he is.
He took his current bets against that index and rolled them over, extending the expiration and raising the strike prices, making the bets more aggressive and more expensive. Hedging a trader makes him cheap. A trader who pays for more time and more aggressive terms is not hedging. He makes commitments.
And that same week, he did something he had never done in 25 years of investing. He's shorting Caterpillar, a stock he openly says has always been great for him because AI Mania has turned the bulldozer company into a stock that's growing 53x. I revealed this whole strange story in a previous video.
The link to it is right here, and it is worth watching after this, because it is the same thesis in a helmet. Put the whole picture together, and his verdict stops sounding like a deal. According to him , the boom in the chip market is the beginning of the end. He expects the semiconductor sector to fall by about 30%.
Micron, the most cyclical stock in the group, stretched further than at any time since 1984, is simply the one he has bet the most on. Now the other side, and I'm going to explain it to you properly , because this channel exists to help you think, not to sell you a crash. And here is a really strong strategy.
Start with the bank. Some of the biggest names on Wall Street, looking at this particular sell-off, called it a healthy reboot within a memory supercycle, not the end of it. Their argument is based on something real. The shortage of high-speed memory is so severe that serious analysts believe it will persist until 2027.
If this is true, then Micron's record profits are not a peak. This is a plateau that still has years of work left to do. New factories in South Korea take years to get up and running. The demand for artificial intelligence may indeed exceed it. And in this world, a sevenfold profit is not an illusion.
It's actually cheap. And stocks make a living. And Bura's put options expire aimlessly. And his own track record demands honesty here. Boer sold Tesla short in 2021 and lost. He warned for years about the market in the mid-2010s, when it doubled. Being early has been his characteristic flaw throughout his career.
And being early and being wrong are indistinguishable while they are happening. He knows all this. That is why the rate is based on put options with a defined risk, and not on the rate that the firm sells short. Size, not scream. If the cycle is delayed another year, he loses the premium, and the bulls do a victory lap.
This is a very real possibility, and anyone who tells you otherwise is selling you a confidence that does n't exist. So here's where all this impacts your money, and I want to be precise, not dramatic. Yes, Micron is in your S&P 500 index fund. A modest stake, nothing that would doom anyone to harm per se.
The real reason why this is important to you is because of what Micron represents in the machine. Memory is the most fragile link in the entire artificial intelligence trade. The purest commodity that breaks down the fastest when spending slows. Booms don't announce their end from above. They break first at the most cyclical edge.
And memory is this land. In the meantime, think about what the rest of your portfolio is quietly suggesting. The tech giants at the top of your index fund are valued based on AI growth. Chip stocks are valued based on AI spending. Even industrial stocks, caterpillars, have been overvalued as AI infrastructure plays a role.
Layer upon layer, the diversified index fund in your retirement account has been transformed into one concentrated bet . That AI capital spending continues to accelerate without a hitch. Micron is the canary in that coal mine. If the memory cycle returns to reality, it won't be Micron's story for long.
This becomes the first strong evidence that the assumption about costs that underpinned everything else was wrong. That's why a bet of this size on this particular company's stock is worth a 20-minute video. This is not about one chip manufacturer. This is a foundation investigation. So what are you actually observing from here ?
Three things in order. First, memory prices and capacity news from South Korea. Each new announcement about the plant is another wave added to the flood. This is the supply side of the cycle. Second, and circle this , the end of July is when Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta will report earnings and update their AI spending plans.
This number of capital expenditures is the oxygen supply for this entire sector. The quarter when this number levels out is the quarter when the boom countdown begins. And thirdly, Bura's own scoreboard. He called for about a 30% decline in the sector. You can measure this yourself from the June peak in real time.
No expert needed. If chips rise to new highs from here, he's in early again. Maybe he's wrong again, and you'll know it. If the sector continues to fall like it has this week, you are watching its cycle come closer to schedule. One last thought before you go. 5 days ago, the hottest stock in America was called a capital destroyer by the most famous bear .
And the market's first reaction was to start proving him right. Maybe it will recover next week . Maybe the supercycle proponents are right and this is really just a healthy reboot. But the pattern he points to is record valuations, record capacity additions, cheap multiples on peak earnings, and good news that no longer affects stocks.
This pattern ended the same way 34 times in 42 years. The question is not whether Bur is smarter than the market. The question is whether things are really different this time. Because that's the exact sentence investors said in 1984, 2000, 2008, and 2022. The Caterpillar side of the same story, his first ever short position in a stock he loved, is right here.
And tell me in the comments, capital destroyer or healthy reboot. Whose side are you on, Wall Street or Bur? Thanks for watching, and see you next time.
Comments 0