저자: MeetKevin · 외국인
요약 보기
Meet Kevin은 Vivek Ramaswamy가 실패한 약물(GSK 개발 중단 후 재명명·재분석)을 상장으로 띄워 수십억 달러 사기를 벌였다고 주장한다. 근거로 GSK의 4개 임상 실패, completer analysis로 결과 왜곡, 상장 후 시가총액 약 18억 달러 상승 후 99% 하락을 든다. Vivek 측 반박(FTX 홍보 전력 공격, ad hominem)을 비판하며, 본인의 과거 실수(FTX 홍보 125,000달러, 난폭운전)와 구분해 Vivek은 '고의' 사기로 규정한다. 대상 자산 매매 예측 발언은 없다.
다듬은 글
holy smokes a viveka rumswati's team just responded to allegations that I made against him that he orchestrated a pump and dump scheme and robbed billions of dollars from people and their response is completely shocking now I want to be very clear I plan to make videos on other candidates as well as well I started with Vivek because he did a spaces with Elon Musk which I covered he said he was a biotech entrepreneur which I researched and when I started looking into some of the history I was blown away and not in a good way so yesterday I made a video where I discussed my findings I discussed what I believe could be a fraudulent history for Vivek no look it's very common in the pharmaceutical world to make wild claims for drugs that end up failing but I believe what Vivek did took fraud to a whole new level now I want to be very clear people make mistakes I make mistakes all the time time but I think the difference between making a mistake and a character flaw is a are you knowingly doing something wrong and not caring or did you just make a mistake and you shouldn't do that and then you don't do it again those are differences right or did you unknowingly do something that ended up being a mistake either way you should try to distance yourself from bad things but if you knowingly did something to defraud people of billions of dollars then I think that takes fraud to a whole new level see what I alleged in my video yesterday was that I believe Vivek took a failed drug a completely failed drug which had been proven to be a failure through at least four studies some say up to 13 different clinical trials but we'll just say four major studies conducted by the manufacturer of the drug GlaxoSmithKline to the point where that company gave up on the drug Vivek then bought the rights to that drug changed the name of the drug apparently conducted no published studies or published Research into the drug instead simply renamed the drug reinterpreted the results of one of the existing GSK studies not a study they did themselves but simply rigged the data using a completer analysis which basically only takes results from patients who had either complete profiles or or completed the trial which totally skews the results to success because people who complete trials are generally the ones the drug works for right so complete rigging but it's not just that because computer analyzes are used to get to phase three trials the nasty part is that's all they did is use a completer analysis or rigged analysis to go to IPO with the drug using his mom to publish results that were in my opinion rigged that ended up propping up the market value of this drug on Wall Street to over 1.8 billion dollars which made him his mother his brother his friends his hedge fund investors everyone very very wealthy presumably he made lots of money who knows maybe they spent it all or lost it all but for a drug that two years later unsurprisingly failed losing 99 of its value see Vivek is great at talking smooth but I think that's smooth talking potentially enabled him to orchestrate a multi-billion dollar fraud but then hide behind well it was all disclosed in SEC documents so on one hand people say well what he did wasn't illegal and my argument isn't whether what he did was technically legal or illegal my argument is if somebody has the character to say let's take a complete failure and promote it knowingly promote a failure that wiped out billions of dollars for people then that makes me question your character he knew that the way to get rich was Wall Street and I think that's what's effed up especially for somebody running for president and look everybody makes mistakes I've made mistakes as well I'll quickly fill you in since you might not know anything about me and then I want to get to their response because like I said their response is really shocking so look last year I screwed up at least a couple times probably a lot more and I try my best to be 100 transparent on this channel I got a reckless driving charge last year and you know what I deserved it I wish I could go back and change it but I can't all I can do is do better going forward and that's exactly what I do I will never get a reckless driving charge again because I have committed to not making that mistake again I messed up but I don't think that makes me a flawed person it just makes me a person it makes me a human who made a mistake and now if I keep repeating that same mistake that would be bad now I think there's a lot more obviously to you know the world in terms of people making mistakes but I think we should be very transparent I went from working at Jamba Juice to being a top selling real estate broker I try my best to work really hard I became a licensed lender or licensed contractor I became a millionaire investing in real estate before I ever became a YouTuber I did become a YouTuber I think I had great success between 2018 and today and I hope that success continues knock on wood I'm going to keep trying to work really hard and now I'm a licensed financial advisor and I'm a manager of an actively managed ETF I believe I'm the first YouTuber to do so now again that doesn't come with downsides and remember I want to get to vivek's response here in a moment but I did also get tied up in unknowingly promoting well what ended up being a scam which I also feel bad about people say this oh you're the guy who promoted FTX where I get it I was one of basically all of the financial YouTubers and Outlets the NFL referees wearing FTX hacks Taylor Swift being days away from signing a contract with FTX some people made a rumor it was the attorneys in this case made a rumor that oh she knew it was a scam didn't want to invest later comes out no she had no idea it was a scam nobody knew FTX was a scam and a lot of people unfortunately got hurt and I feel terrible about that as well because Sam bankman freed ended up being a complete fraud today everybody knows he was a complete fraud and we hope he gets served Justice I was paid 125 000 for promoting FTX so far I'm down about twenty five thousand dollars in legal fees though it looks like we've got a settlement in the works knock on wood and hopefully that's all over so in my opinion this is all over pending a Judicial sign off but look those are mistakes that happen but I didn't knowingly promote FTX knowing it was a fraud nobody knew that the NFL wouldn't put their name on FTX if they knew it was a fraud and that's the difference between in my opinion what I'm concerned about with Vivek and a mistake that happened to me last year if you unknowingly promote something that is bad you make a mistake you promise to do better either you stop promoting things or you do a lot more due diligence and you move on and you do the best to help people make whole what they lost for example I committed to take whatever additional money I have left after the whole legal nonsense and work on helping people receive restitution for essentially their damages obviously I can't do that until the cases are over so I know what is actually left but then we can create some kind of Charity or whatever as I've promised to do and so that's exactly what I'm going to do so again though there's a very big difference here and I think it's worth comparing to the difference is simple if you have no idea that something is a fraud then you make a mistake and you can be excused for that it's still Stained on your reputation people still comment about it we know that but mistakes happen the difference here is if Vivek knew his drug was a failure which obviously he knew given that all the studies before were a failure and conducted no new studies and simply remarketed it as a success to get rich on Wall Street then really Vivek acted like the Sam bankman freed and I was more like the investor in vivek's drug not knowing that what was being promoted was a scam that's a really big difference and for somebody running for president we ought to know if that is somebody's character that they are willing to knowingly promote a scam and a fraud again keyword being knowingly that's the sad part but the worst part and I can't believe it gets even worse is how they responded to me look I want to be clear maybe there's more information that's publicly available that I haven't found that could lead us to change the interpretation that I have I don't profess to have all of the facts I'm putting out all the information that I have which lead me to draw the conclusion that Vivek knowingly promoted a fraud and that is a character flaw in my opinion that is a character flaw and he's been Unapologetic about being a failed biotech entrepreneur regarding the acts of ant drug concerns me okay so I invited Vivek to clear his name I invited him to either I'll visit him in person we could YouTube stream this we could Twitter space to stream this whatever I invite Vivek I still do to clear his name again like I said I'll even visit in person just like I did with boxable see what I do for a living is I study things the more I study the more I feel like I understand the world around us whether it's the fed or politics or whatever in 2021 I ran for governor in California despite being 29 when I ran I came in second place in the recall election against the governor I tried to save California which is a very broken Place politically so beautiful otherwise and I was one of the first to make big arguments like hey we need more spending on Mental Health we need more funding on policing we should not defund the police we should be funding the police we should be focusing on our homeless population and actually solving the root of the problem the mental health issues that our country faces but less about me let's focus on their response and I hate to say their response is pretty scary so their response is from their Deputy communications director their response is pretty disgusting you ready for this this is the response from a presidential candidate so here's the thread uh exposing the multi-billion dollar fraud uh somebody here writes Kevin finally figured it out Stefan or Steven some people like to be pronounce it differently says not really exposing Democrat meet Kevin okay everybody knows I'm like 51.49 yeah I'm registered as a Democrat like big deal okay anyway being sued for a billion dollars okay that's the FTX thing paid to pump up FTX before it's collapse FTX thing so it's so far the same argument people lost their life savings uh and keep in mind I tried my best to warn people I'm like get your money out of FDX for weeks before this place collapsed the writing was all over towards the end unfortunately but anyway paid to promote a guy charged with eight Federal accounts of defrauding customers laundry money and violating campaign Finance laws keep in mind all of those so far are the same thing same company Mega Democrat donor basically Sam bakeman freed uh destroyed paid to tell people to invest with Sam Bateman freed and and so all of those points right there so far all related to FTX it's like is that is that all you got on me Kevin is a failed Democrat candidate it's true I didn't become the governor but I'm actually really proud of our campaign our campaign shared a lot of ideas that are now showing up in California politics which is really cool because that was one of the best things I could have hoped for short of winning was that my ideas would live on and people would take my ideas for solving homelessness or mental uh education and me I called it mental education just like PE in schools oh well uh he's mortified about being sued for this video uh no not really I have a staff attorney and if y'all are gonna sue me over this let's go because the beauty about that is y'all will have to really put all of the history on the table so bring it on or you could not go the whole lawsuit direction and you could be reasonable which is hey look here's what we did this is all you have to do is respond with here's what we did that was different here's why we think what we did was not a fraud and then let's let people analyze it let people make the decision it's ridiculous looks like someone beat him to the punch already suing him for one billion dollars so that is the same thing as the FTX thing so it's like you're saying the same things over and over again here and that's just marketing a lawsuit like nobody actually expects to be sued for a billion dollars like this is this is how you Market a lawsuit this is how you get news how you get people talking about it uh but I think their response in my opinion it's kind of like Tucker Carlson going up to Joe Biden and saying hey who who's really in control of the White House Biden and then Biden responding with well who's really in control of your podcast Tucker you got fired from your last job now these are things known as ad hominem fallacies it's basically bad logic and you would expect better from somebody's campaign who says they went to Harvard and Yale which I don't dispute that they did but I mean like come on expect better you might not be familiar with logic uh I I think we're all familiar with logic logic but I mean like studied logic so an ad homine attack let's let's analyze this so this is how an argument is structured an argument is usually structured in a simple way you start with a claim and the claim is you knowingly marketed a fraud drug that's the claim Kevin is making my evidence is that previous failures via four clinical trials and you only had six months to launch and the fact that you didn't change anything or publish any other research to me indicates evidence that you knowingly marketed a fraud drug you knew was going to fail and you did that to make billions of dollars and therefore I make the conclusion signified by these three dots now you may be unfit for office because that may be part of your character it's not just making a mistake it's your character could be flawed that's really scary right not because you're going to launch another fraud bio drug although you could argue that riovan that makes 20 you know eight million dollars in a year and burns over 1.1 billion dollars could be a fraud of you know for investors but yeah I guess that's a topic for a different video but anyway uh the the correct way to respond to this is usually claim no Vivek is not a fraud here's the evidence the evidence is we did more research and we changed this or that or whatever and we just made an entrepreneurial attempt and therefore while we failed we are not a fraud because we we just legitimately tried that's the correct response model that's such an easy way to bury this but their response is claim we are not fraud you're a fraud the evidence you promoted FTX their conclusion we are not a fraud because the person saying it promoted FTX unknowingly okay that is a fallacy this is called it's an argument but it's called bad argumentation bad argumentation is when you don't actually address what the argument is so if my argument is you're a fraud and your argument is no you're a fraud then what you've done is you've conducted an ad hominem fallacy this is a way of saying rather than addressing the original problem you were simply saying attacks of the person speaking these things about you and you're spending not a lick of time responding to the actual claims being made that's actually worse so take a look at some of these responses here and Twitter to the person you guys got exposed your response is childish how about responding to the comment about Vivek instead of attacking Kevin's character he's not the one running for office I liked Vivek at Patrick but David's but it makes sense now why he wouldn't respond to whom he hired here's somebody who writes classic ad hominem against me Kevin easier to attack the messenger than answer the allegations delivered but this attack leaves suspicions that there are not good responses to the allegations easier to attack than find legitimate responses sounds angrily defensive and deflective interesting calm strategy from a comms strategist Vivek should respond about this elaborate pump and dump scheme he did the SEC gov would love to hear about it all three out of four of your bullet points are literally the same dope ad hominem argument bro answer the allegations directly and remember a non-answer like the one you gave is an answer you got exponed as being exposed as being owned by big Pharma anyway okay so this is wild I was not expecting uh this kind of response I was legitimately thinking hey look if if I were the Vivek team I think the way to do it is let's if this is the one thing people are mad about sure maybe there are other things let's go all the way back and let's go ahead and grab the files of 2015 it wasn't that long ago show us all the work you did in the six months leading up to the work of your job and you know what maybe there's something you just haven't told the world like theoretically you could even make something up at least give some people a reason to believe you're not a fraud but this response doesn't even give people that potential hope and it's even more concerning so again we don't know with certainty we're just saying look this is what we can see publicly it smells like a fraud Vivek would you care to tell us why we are wrong and then we can address that and we can move on that's all we're looking for man but attacking me for mistakes one that I screwed up on uh and another that I unknowingly was involved in a scam which I feel horrible about still the FTX disaster is is not a way to defend yourself I don't know kind of scary anyway if you like the kind of breakdowns that I do consider subscribing to the channel share the vide
Comments 0