원문 보기
Imagine if I told you that successful investing in the stock market doesn't require you to create complex financial models of companies every day, nor do you need to look at market charts every day. The approach of Peter Lunch, one of the world's famous investors, was quite simple. He believed that even ordinary investors could identify interesting investment opportunities by observing the world around them.
But while it's important to like a product, buying the company's stock is a different thing. Peter Lynch's name is taken with great respect in the world of investing. She was a legendary fund manager of the Magellan Fund and her investing philosophy was very practical. He tried to make investors understand why the stock market does not need to be unnecessarily complicated.
If you understand a business , look at the company's growth, analyze earnings and compare the price with the business fundamentals, you can make better investment decisions. A famous idea from Peter Lunch's approach is the peg ratio. PEG stands for Price to Earnings Growth Ratio. Understand in simple language.
The PE ratio tells us how much price investors are paying in comparison to the company's earnings. But like watching PE sometimes it's not int. We also have to see at what speed the company's earnings are growing. For example, suppose a company has a PE ratio of 20 and its expected earnings growth is also around 20%.
Where Peg Rapley could be one. Peter Lynch's framework of approximating one peg is reasonable as a starting point. If the peg is significantly below one, the stock may be relatively attractive compared to growth. And if the peg is too high, investors may ask the question: is he paying too high a price for growth?
But one very important warning is that there is no physical formula that will automatically tell you which stocks to buy. Growth estimates can be wrong. Earnings can be predictable and market expectations can change. That's why you should learn to use the pack as a tool. Not like First Decisions. Now let us take a simple example.
Suppose Company A has a PE of 15 and earnings growth of 15%. Its peg is roughly one. Company B has a PE of 30 and an earnings growth of 10%. Its peg is roughly three. Company A's valuation at the surplus level may appear more reasonable compared to its growth. But this does not mean that Company A is automatically a better investment.
We also need to look at debt, cash flow, business quality, competition, management and future growth. Another important part of Twitter's philosophy was that investors should understand the business. You must understand how the company makes money. What is the company's product? And who are the customers?
Where is the revenue coming from ? And what is the cost to the company? How strong is the competition? And will the company grow in the future or not? According to PTS, occasional investors have an advantage that professional investors do not have. That advantage is observation in daily life. You are shopping and a product suddenly becomes very popular.
You are going to a restaurant and seeing a long queue of customers there. You're using a new technology or service and noticing why people are rapidly adopting it. This observation completely changes your idea of doing research. But wherever a common mistake happens. Just because you like a product.
This does not mean that the company's stock is also a good investment. The product may become popular. But the valuation of the company can be very expensive. The company may have high debt. Profit margins may be weak. Competition can be strong. That is why observation is just the starting point of research.
Not a replacement for research. Peterl also looked at companies in different categories. Such as slow growers, starters, fast growers, cyclicals, turnarounds and asset place. The purpose of this classification was to understand that not every company should be analyzed with the same expectations. For example, if a company is a slow growing business, you cannot expect 25% or 30% annual growth from it.
If there is a fast-growing company, then it is important to carefully analyze its growth, sustainability and valuation. And with cyclical companies, it is very important to understand the earnings cycles. Because profits can be very high in one period and very low in another period. Now let's come to Peter Lynch's famous idea.
Invest in what you know. Many people start misunderstanding this sentence. This does not mean that you should invest in a company without research just because you use its product. Its simple meaning is that make your personal knowledge and observation the starting point of research. Suppose you find the business of a company interesting.
First of all add that company to the list. Then see what is the revenue trend? Is the profit increasing or not? What is the trend of the stock on earnings ? How much is Dept? Is it manageable or not? Is the cash flow strong or not? Are the margins of companies improving or not? What is the track record of the management?
And most importantly, whether the current stock price is reasonable in comparison to the expected growth of the business. Fitter's approach is basically a combination. Business Understanding Plus Numbers Plus Valuation Plus Patience. Now let us understand another important concept. Price and value are not always the same in the stock market.
Even an excellent company can turn out to be a bad investment. If you are paying a very high price for it, even an average looking company can sometimes become an attractive opportunity. If the market is valuing it at an unnecessarily low price. That's why Peter also focused on lens valuation. You should compare the company's growth with its valuation.
Just seeing that the company's profits are growing is not the point. The question should be how much price am I paying for this growth. Suppose a company's profit is growing at 20% but the PE ratio of the stock is 60. You should question whether future growth is already included in the stock price? On the other hand, if the company is growing at 15% and the valuation is comparatively reasonable, it could be a very interesting starting point for research.
But it is difficult to predict future growth. This is why humanity is so central to Peterland style investing. Investors should accept that predictions are never 100% accurate. And the key lesson is not to overreact to short term market movements. If you understand the company fundamentally and your investment thesis is strong, it is not necessary to change your decisions on every small price movement.
If the stock goes up by 5%, there should be no excitement. If the stock goes down by 5%, there should be no panic. First, look at the business model. But this does not mean that you should blindly hold every losing stock. Investors should review their decisions if the company's fundamentals have permanently changed, the growth story has weakened, debt has reached dangerous levels, there are management problems, or the investment thesis has proven wrong.
Perhaps the most powerful part of the Fitel approach is that it teaches investors to focus on the business rather than market noise. You do n't need to predict the market every day. You do not need to predict whether Nifty will go up or down on Monday. All you have to do is try to understand whether the business you are investing in can grow in the long term or not.
And are you paying a reasonable price for that growth or not? If you want to convert the Peterl formula into a simple checklist, the first question should be: I understand this business. And secondly, is the company's earnings growing or not? And thirdly, does the growth seem sustainable or not? And fourth, the debt and balance sheet is healthy.
And fifth, what is the company's competitive advantage? And whether the valuation of Shut Up stock is reasonable in comparison to the growth. Peg ratios can be a useful starting tool. The simple formula is PEG/PE ratio divided by earnings growth rate. If the PE is 20 and earnings growth is 20% then the PEG is one.
If the PE is 30 and the growth is 10% then the peg is three. But remember, the Earning Growth Percentage has to be used in the calculation on a consistent basis and the quality of the estimates also improves. In today's time, information is very easily available to investors. But information overload is also a problem.
Some stocks are trending on social media. This does not mean that it is a good investment. Someone called the stocks a multibagger. This does n't mean you should say goodbye. The price of a stock suddenly doubled. This does not mean that the company will grow at the same speed in the future. The Twitter lines approach gives us this difficult mindset.
First understand the business, then look at the numbers and then look at the valuation and then take decisions and this is one thing every investor should remember. Good investing does n't mean being right every time. You may be wrong in some investments. The point is how to identify your mistakes. Control risk and improve your research process.
If you are a beginner, do n't look at the Peter Formula as a stock picking shortcut. Make it look like a framework. This framework teaches you to ask better questions. Is the business simple? Are earnings growing ? Is the growth realistic? Is the valuation reasonable? Is the company financially strong?
Does the company have any advantage over the competition? And if the market temporarily punishes stocks , is the business fundamentally strong ? Ultimately, the simple lesson of Peter Lynch's philosophy is that success in the stock market does n't just come with intelligence. Patience, discipline and research are also equivalent.
You can observe the businesses around you. You can make a list of interesting companies. But check the numbers before buying the stock. Compare growth with valuation. Use the pack-like ratio as a starting point. And most importantly, do not blindly depend on any single formula. There is no magic formula in the stock market.
But a strong process can definitely happen. And Pietrich's process gives us this simple lesson. Finding opportunities in the market does n't always require complicated things. Sometimes opportunities start with businesses around you. But investment decisions should always be taken after research and valuation.
If you want to learn investing seriously, then the next step should be to understand the business of the company instead of just looking at the stock price. Because ultimately, there is real business behind the stock market and it is the performance of the business that ultimately drives the value of the stock in the long term.
That's why next time you see a popular company, do n't immediately think whether you should buy its stock or not. First ask how this company makes money and can this business grow bigger in the future? This mindset can take you from being a normal stock voucher to becoming a better investor. If you liked today's video then like it, subscribe to the channel and see you in the next video with the next topic. Until then, thank you.
Comments 0