저자: Kevin · 외국인
요약 보기
일론 머스크의 AI 'Grok'을 소개하며 Twitter 데이터 학습, 유머/반항적 응답 스타일을 설명. 그러나 Grok의 SBF 관련 답변이 VC 시스템 비판에 치우쳐 있다고 지적하며, 한쪽 관점만 주입하는 '편향된 AI'가 위험하다고 주장. 영상 후반엔 자신의 강좌 홍보.
다듬은 글
wow Elon Musk is back at it again this time launching his own competitor to chat GPT even though self- admittedly Groo as his platform is called is more closely a competitor to GPT 3.0 or meta's neural Nets language learning models Elon Musk suggests hey we've done great for the two works of training we've been or two months of training we've been able to do so quite frankly for the progress we were able to do within 2 months we're very proud of this and I have to say for 2 months of training they're doing pretty great I'll show you some samples here of the progress but I have to say there is a massive risk factor I already found in one of their own samples a massive red flag in Elon musk's language learning model now I'll talk about and reveal that in just a moment I do want to give you some quick bottom lines though what they're doing with this language model is they're training it on realtime Twitter data Elon Musk touts this as a massive advantage to GPT now considered GPT currently does have plugins to allow you to browse the internet with Bing this is obviously after Microsoft's investment into open Ai and the partnership there this has been very seamless so uh maybe that you know competition could be worn down a bit or that Gap could be worn down a bit however Elon suggests that look we now for our API at Twitter potentially charge as much as $42,000 per month per user per Enterprise user uh and that $42,000 here it is is is really just to provide a moat around how valuable Twitter's data actually is now back when Elon was beginning to acquire Twitter we talked regularly on this channel about how it would actually be great for the foundation of verbal Ai and how this could be very useful in a future let's say Optimus robot and I've been a big believer that you could train people on mass sets of data and create pretty strong language learning models that will be very useful in robotics improving stupid language learning facilities like Siri which honestly is like probably the equivalent of like GPT .1 like it's so bad why is Siri still so bad I I don't understand you get plugins to turn it into a GPT 4 though which that's actually substantially better or just go straight into the gp4 app and use the voice app oh it's so good use the voice feature oh Game Changer but anyway what's the big problem that I found with this I'm going to tell you the big problem I do also want to give you the opportunity though to know that if you go to xai on Twitter you'll be able to see the announcing Gro post which I'm pretty sure that's pronounced with a long o in case you're wondering uh Elon did post on Twitter that it has the long vowel o but anyway they do offer Early Access so if you click uh if you go to the release go to xai on Twitter you'll be able to join their wait list to get early access to this this is where they talk about how they're using rust as a platform for sort of building this on uh they talk about some of the compar to 3.5 and how this is grou 1.0 essentially and and it's a very early beta product okay great so we got that out of the way what's the big criticism that I have and I know some people are going to say Kevin why why are you always criticizing Elon and look I want to say this is amazing if I had many billions of dollars and I were a billionaire I'd be running a language model as well I'd be wanting to compete in the space I have so many ideas for this kind of stuff but we don't have the funding to turn you know some like to to actually create a GPT competitor right so let's be real you compete where you can compete which for me that's real estate or uh you know personally I like to think providing perspective and value on the internet that's why I sell amazing new BR Pro crash courses they're great you can now get them for under $100 that price will be up over $100 by next Friday so check those out at meetkevin.com but what pains me is and many of you already know this it has to do here's a grou sample okay many of you already know this this one of the things that absolutely pains me about Twitter and and maybe it's just human psychology maybe it's just scrolling psychology maybe it's true it probably is of YouTube shorts Instagram shorts or reals rather and Tik Tok as well but it's the surface level aggravation content that is very sharable but honestly leads to more jaded Americans or actual actually Global Citizens and I think it's a net negative to our society and and not trying to like I'm going to give you the example really quickly but just quick bottom line on this I think we want people who wake up every day including everyone who's watching this who's here to learn that deep perspective because that's what we provide on the channel ideally everybody wakes up and thinks okay if I hear something how can I fact check this how can I test that for myself where is the real bias are the motivations behind somebody who's showing me something or telling me something evil are they well-intended but sometimes mistaken are they more often right than they're wrong right these are the things we should analyze problem with this sort of outraged journalism that we find is we get left as very jaded and it ends up being demoralizing we're like you know what the system's rigged we can't get ahead in America why bother trying let's just go back to sleep I've been working my ass off you know 14-hour days for X years and I still don't feel like I'm getting ahead those are really real sentiments in America but it's just self-fulfilling if now we be unfortunately really negative and jaded so here's a Gro example so the point of Gro is to incorporate humor it's worth noting they do say in their release that Gro is designed to answer questions with a bit of wit and a rebellious streak so please don't use it if you hate humor okay fair disclaimer I think that's great this rebellious streak it's important to remember that if people are going to use your product to learn from it it's fine to be rebellious and funny but it's also really important to provide at least multiple angles of of perspective otherwise you become sort of a one-sided monster that's what I'm worried about here so here somebody says Gro any news about SBF and then it says searching for news about SBF which by the way I have to say I kind of like the logo here it's sort of half of the X right X AI anyway great uh anyway oh my dear human I have some juicy news for you it seems that our friend s bankman freed the former cryptocurrency Mogul has been found guilty on all counts in his fraud trial can you believe it okay this is cool like I like this this is very very conversational right uh now down here they say let's not forget and we're going to talk about this in the moment let's not forget that he faces up to 110 years in prison that's quite a long time to ponder the consequences of one's actions don't you think and to think all of this could have been avoided if he had just followed some simple rule some some of the simple rule or the simple rule rather of just not stealing billions of dollars from FTX customers alas some customers never win in any case I hope this news s satisfies your curiosity if you have any more questions or need further assistance please don't hesitate to ask that is great okay 10 out of 10 love it I love the sort of like rebellious like I'm a pirate yate alas some people just never learn this is great really conversational high quality 10 out of 10 Elon like if we could just stop here full stop fantastic job and quite frankly I am proud that somebody like Elon is trying to compete in the space I don't know some people think I don't like El I I love Elon I admire Elon I really do but I have criticisms that do leave me concerned and hopefully hopefully if it's not him it's people around him who hear the criticism and go you know what Kevin that is a real problem and we will address that that's all we're looking for here so what is the real red flag of Elon musk's AI platform you ready for it first we know it's trained on Twitter data right okay wrong button that was anti anticlimactic it's right here can you believe it he's guilty on all counts the jury just took 8 hours to figure out what the smartest best VCS in the world couldn't do in years he committed Garden variety fraud it's a wild ride isn't it okay let's parse this apart first of all I despise VCS house Haack took not a single dime of VC money because honestly I agree the D diligence Venture capitalists do is nominal generally what I believe and I hate to say it but even some of the biggest VCS like Andre Horwitz investing $300 million into the guy who founded wework creating a real estate crypto startup called flow I'm like what are you throwing $300 million at you complete a like this is not somebody who understands real estate they've gone bankrupt twice with Wei work twice okay I honestly think that sometimes these VCS Andre and Horwitz included invest in things that they think they can sell it's the greater fool than I Theory right it's I'm going to invest in flow because at $300 million because I think my 300 will be worth a billion dollars and then I'll cash out and somebody else will be left holding the back so I personally believe the VC system is absolutely disgusting so I want to be very clear about that like VC sucks I've invested Ed Money with VCS that I thought were doing proper due diligence only to find out they did zero due diligence and that relying on them was total like near fraud but it's it's okay like I'm a big boy I made M I made money and then I lost money that happens okay but what pisses me off about this I did it again this what pisses me off about this is not that they're bagging on VCS that's actually kind of funny okay but the perspective that's missing is it didn't just take the damn jury 8 hours some articles even say it just took the jury 3 hours to deliber it okay but it didn't just take the jury 3 to 8 hours okay it didn't that's the thing people forget that wait a second this was a jury that every single waking day of a courtroom calendar had the privilege of listening to provided testimony over 17 days of trial testimony evidence everything that happened handed to a jury on a silver platter in retrospect okay this is after it all collapse here's how it went down here's the testimony here's the evidence 20 well at least 17 full trial days plus other days here at least 17 days of this count the trial squares here s us vers Sam bankman free of course they had way more time to understand that Sam bankman freed is a complete fraudulent and an embarrassment for the crypto industry quite frankly Sam bman freed should go to jail for the maximum amount of time possible just to send a signal that if you want to be a fraud in crypto you go to jail if you're a fraud you deserve to be in prison because it's terrible for a startup industry crypto which blockchain has such wonderful use applications and long term I expect it will have even more practical use applications right A lot of them right now mostly theoretical uh it's disgusting because people are ruining this but the point is VC's didn't have the benefit of hindsight which we know is 2020 all the evidence provided on silver platter and 17 plus days of trial so what I wanted to do is compare and I understand it's grou 1.1 I understand it's in beta blah blah blah blah blah right I understand that but I just want to give you a contrast because I'm a little concerned because you could be like the rebellious humorous replying and then say but In fairness the jury had the benefit of hindsight whereas the venture capitalists didn't right that alone is a big difference but look at this I asked this is GPT I want you to see the whole thing okay why was s SPF qu uh convicted so quickly if VC's missed that he was a fraud it only took the jurors a few hours to convict is the VC system broken oh boy I feel like that should have been like a colon or semicolon but anyway the case of s bankman freed who was recently convicted for defrauding customers investors and lenders of10 billion through his crypto Exchange highlights a concern regarding the VC system's ability to detect fraudulent Behavior true the conviction has been perceived as a significant event right and potentially just the tip of the iceberg your question brings up a compelling point about the efficiency and effectiveness of VC of the VC system in identifying fraud particularly when jurors were able to convict in a short amount of time so far that's the same as Groo right so far that's the same however here we go it might suggest a gap in due diligence or the evaluation processes of VCS which fail to uncover fraudulent activities that's the bashing on VC part right but ready for the perspective ready for the flip side perspective that every language uh learning model should be demanded commanded to provide however it's worth noting that the processes and objectives of VCS and courts are fundamentally different VCS might be more focused on potential returns and Innovative aspects of projects right this is the ability to resell a project are people really buying from VCS because they're doing the diligence or because they're like they have a name and they're reselling right that part of the system I agree is totally different and now possibly overlooking red flags in the process that is again a failure of Reas I I concur however here's the flip side the courts focuses on upholding the law and ensuring Justice the speed of the conviction could be du due to a variety of factors including the clarity of evidence the effectiveness of the prosecution or the understanding of the jurors it does not necessarily reflect on the VC system again it's the element of hindsight and we can even ask so is this a potential case of hindsight verse a stupid VC system we'll do it live together right obviously we expect the answer is yeah it's absolutely possible here that this could be a factor of hins but at least at least we're getting some of that perspective let's see how GPT uh 4 responds after the conviction of SPF it might be easy to look back and point out the signs of fraudulant activity however those signs might not have been as clear to the VC firms at the time of their investment especially if the fraudulent activities were well concealed yeah totally true oversight there might have been oversight or lapses in the due diligence process of VCS usually it's a little bit of everything right it's the benefit of hindsight versus oversight issues at the beginning the due diligence process wasn't thorough enough there could also be systemic problems in the VC system again this is the greater fool theory that I talk about uh so I think it's a little bit of everything but it's really worth remembering that the VC system had a lot more color here I think most of most logical people who listen to this are like yeah I mean Kevin that makes sense and then we're going to get replies like oh but is just on 1.0 I know but it's being trained on Twitter so what's my big concern that it goes down this path of Jade and under the guise of humor when reality it's just brainwashing people in one jaded perspective yikes let me know what you think in the links down below if you want perspective on how to build your wealth with real estate stocks or otherwise make sure to go to meetkevin.com learn all about entrepreneurship Building Wealth starting at zero and building real wealth for the long term a ources or by actively manag ETF which you can
Comments 0