원문 보기
Wall Street has concluded that companies involved in artificial intelligence are paying too much money to build out the data centers. The hundreds of billions of dollars that they're all spending has turned off money managers and driven them toward other tech companies or even other growth companies from different sectors, including industrials, drugs, anything that has nothing to do with data.
In fact, the data center is now a scarlet letter and Wall Street loves industrials that have zero contact with these money pits. That right there is the mood Jim Kramer is pushing back against. Not because he thinks AI is a fad, but because he thinks the market is punishing the whole neighborhood for one very specific sin, unchecked spending.
If you want a number one AI stock pick for 2026, the story starts with what investors are sick of today and what has to change for the best names to breathe again. In Kramer's world, you do not need AI to slow down. You need AI to grow up. Consider four out of the five top performance SP500 this year are tech.
But listen to this kind of tech. SanDisk, Western Digital, Seagate, Micron. Why these? because they're plain old-fashioned data storage companies with an immense amount of demand and not nearly enough supply. And the storage companies are inherently boom and then bust. Always have been, always will.
He's basically saying the market has done that classic thing where it runs away from the flashy party and hides in the boring but needed corner. storage suddenly looks heroic because it feels tangible, measurable, and underbuilt. But he also slips in the warning label. This is a boom and bust business that matters for 2026 because a number one pick is not just about what pops next week.
It's about who still wins after the cycle turns and the easy trades get crowded. Right now, there's not enough capital equipment to relieve the tightness in the market. So these companies can put through endless price increases. But the moment there are enough machines to manufacture these products, their stocks will indeed plummet, as they always do.
That's Kramer's tell. He likes the setup, but he's not pretending it's forever. So if you're trying to think like him and hunt for the AI winner, you can still own into 2026 without sweating every inventory chart. You start separating great right now from great through the next chapter. Storage can be a terrific trade.
But his real AI argument is about what happens when the spending war cools down and the smart money comes back to the companies that sell the picks and shovels. Mike Brown reports after the close tomorrow night. And while it is one of my absolute favorite stocks and I think it'll have an amazing quarter, there will be analysts who try to call a tie.
The House of Pain. He's telling you Micron is a favorite, but he's also telling you exactly how this movie goes. Great quarter, excitement, then somebody screams top and tries to end the party early. That is not how he talks when he's teeing up a long runway theme. And right after that, he pivots hard away from a single earnings report and toward the big AI chess board where the stakes are measured in data centers, power, and ego.
Right now, you got five big tech companies, five families, so to speak. Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta, and OpenAI in partnership with Oracle. They're going all out to build these data centers anywhere they can. They're even in space. They're each trying to outspend the competition, if not dominate everything, then at least to keep rivals from snapping up their own core businesses.
This is the backbone of his whole thesis. It's not AI demand is fading. It's AI demand is so intense and the rivalry is so personal that the spending has gotten reckless. That kind of dynamic does not end because somebody on television says, "Be careful." It ends because somebody with a balance sheet hits a wall.
And when that wall shows up, the market stops punishing everyone equally and starts rewarding the companies that survive the shift from chaos to discipline. And open AI, they want to come after everybody with a budget of at least $300 billion for Oracle alone and many other commitments made to many other companies totaling a whopping 1.4 4 trillion.
This reckless, imprudent data center spending has been collapsing the value of all the stocks. Many have tried to rein them in, but to no avail. He's painting it like a frenzy that's big enough to scare professionals out of the whole theme. That's important because it explains why the best AI names can be right and still trade wrong for stretches of time.
When the street feels like the spending has no breaks, it does not care who sells the best chips, the best networking, or the best anything. It just backs away. So, if you want the 2026 setup, you want the moment the street decides the breaks are real. Now, in my version of what's going to happen here, right now, Oracle and Open AI, they represent the renegades here with a show of force that's totally unnecessary.
In fact, OpenAI CEO Sam Wolman, he kind of reminds me of Sunny Corleion because he's too impetuous to lead the family. He's using Oracle in a $300 billion power play to outspend everyone else and take on all comers. Now, the story becomes personal, which is exactly how bubbles form and exactly how they pop.
Kramer's saying the war is being kept alive by pride, momentum, and the fear of falling behind. That's why he keeps stressing discipline because once discipline shows up, the narrative flips. The market stops seeing a bottomless pit and starts seeing a predictable buildout with winners who can plan around it.
Sam has perhaps $50 billion in the bank. He arguably needs about 25 times that to make his dreams come true. True. Domination dreams. I don't know. Okay, that's a bad news because as long as Alman's spending like crazy, everyone else has to spend to keep up with them. But there's something lurking here that could end the war and allow these stocks to come back to life, and it's called discipline.
That's the hinge for the whole number one AI stock for 2026 angle. In Kramer's logic, the comeback is not powered by hype. It's powered by a truce, a slowdown, a more rational pace that the bond market forces. And once the buildout becomes rational, the best positioned AI beneficiaries are the companies that still get the business whether spending is insane or sane because the infrastructure still has to be built.
In September, Oracle raised $18 billion and just in a bomb the bomb market. Okay. Their bond issuance has drawn scrutiny in the form of aggressive buying of credit default swats. What does that mean? It's basically insurance that pays off of the company defaults on its obligations. Oracle, except you don't need to be a bond holder to buy these insurance policies.
These people are betting against Oracle itself because of the stupid amount of money that it's spending. This is Kramer doing what he always does when he's at his best. He turns the abstract fear into a clear mechanism. The bond market is the adult in the room and it starts enforcing consequences. If you are trying to think ahead to 2026, this is the kind of pressure that can set up the next leg because it forces the system to choose priorities instead of trying to do everything at once.
At some point, they'll heed the warning of the bomb market and slow things down or else. And they don't want the or else. These data centers cost a fortune and even the best builder stumbles. We saw when I don't know if you saw the stock story of Cororeweave today. Oracle can't risk blowing up its balance sheet for Sam Alman.
That's when and how we're going to get out of this morass. Oracle blinks once Oracle shows discipline. So here's where the pick starts to take shape. Kramer's not describing a future where AI disappears. He's describing a future where AI spend becomes survivable. And when that happens, the market can finally reward the companies that are essential to AI without having to underwrite a spending arms race.
In that kind of environment, the cleanest AI stock is often not a hyperscaler with a trillion projects. It's the supplier that still gets paid when everybody calms down and gets practical. But if Oracle starts showing discipline, I think every other hyperscaler f the families would slow down and we get a more reasonable place pace.
It would be one of these things where you would barely notice all the spending. Rationality would return and we wouldn't be reopening 3M Island or trying to build some small nuclear power plants that may not work because we're just that desperate for electricity. That's the ideal setup for 2026. AI demand remains strong, but reckless spending gives way to planning.
When that happens, data center stocks can recover, not because investors suddenly love capex, but because it becomes controlled and predictable. In that environment, the market usually rewards the companies that are impossible to avoid in the AI buildout. Kramer's core message is simple. The AI trade isn't broken because AI failed.
It's broken because spending spiraled into a war. His solution is discipline, forced by the bond market with Oracle eventually slowing the pace. If that truce happens, he believes the entire sector can rebound and the safest AI exposure into 2026 will be the names that still win once spending turns rational.
But you would think wrong when it comes to Broadcom or Nvidia. Both will get plenty of business. The truth is it was never feasible to build all these data centers that are needed. That's why everyone HATES THE STOCKS. IT'S EXACTLY why these TWO STOCKS KEEP GOING DOWN, NOT UNTIL ORACLE BLINKS. If you had to pick just one AI name to ride that discipline and truth storyline into 2026, do you think Kramer's real number one is Nvidia? Or do you think Broadcom has the sneakier path to surprising everybody?
Comments 0