원문 보기
Do you know why governments are suddenly starting to fear Bitcoin? It's not because a few tech nerds got rich . It is because Larry Fink of BlackRock, yes, the man who manages over 13 trillion dollars, now openly admits that . Eric Trump, son of the US president, explains why states should buy Bitcoin or hold it on their balance sheets and why Germany has made a massive mistake .
In a podcast, Eric Trump argues that governments should not sell Bitcoin, but rather buy it and hold it on their national balance sheets. He calls it the biggest strategic mistake when states like Germany sell off their confiscated stocks. The Federal Republic of Germany alone sold around 50,000 Bitcoins a few months ago.
For Trump, this is a missed opportunity of the century. Instead, he praises the USA for holding onto many of its confiscated Bitcoins instead of dumping them on the market. According to him, states must finally understand that Bitcoin is the only major asset that increases by an average of around 70% annually, and that those who are selling now are actually gambling away the future .
Can you make the argument that the government should buy Bitcoin and include it in its balance sheet? Yes, 100%. I think so. Yes. And why? Why is n't the government participating? Why are you using crypto instead of just being more active with it? Let me make the argument for both sides. Correct. Why should a government buy Bitcoin?
Because it is the best-performing asset of the last decade, increasing in value by 70% every year, year after year. Like Germany a few years ago, there was a great article. You probably know, uh, you might know the exact figures, but Germany had approximately 30,000 Bitcoins or something like that and they sold them to Ford.
They converted it into their currency, and it was like the worst investment ever made by a government . And by the way, that's a pretty low bar, as you know, right? Um, the government should definitely have certain crypto assets on its balance sheet. Primarily Bitcoin. And indeed, the United States government is doing the right thing.
They have many confiscations and they have taken a great stance by saying, we are not selling any of it. There are many countries in the world that actively buy when they go into the VE, when they go into many countries. They are actively putting that money into their state coffers and they are looking at the Fortune 500 companies .
They are actively hoarding Bitcoin. The biggest families, the biggest companies, you know, countries, sovereign wealth funds and individuals are all hoarding Bitcoin. That is the reason why it was as explosive as it is. And it's funny, people are saying, yeah, well, Bitcoin has now fallen by 3% . At this time last year, Bitcoin was trading at approximately 55,000 or 60,000.
Uh, it has experienced incredible explosive growth. Why doesn't the country just go out and spend billions to buy it? Because America just doesn't work that way. Correct. Before, uh, in other countries there are sovereign wealth funds and they go out and make investments near that country and, frankly, I wish America had a sovereign wealth fund.
I think it would be the best thing we could have done here, but America does n't work that way, does it? America is, as you know, quite short-sighted. Tax revenues are collected, expenses are paid, and capitalism is allowed to reign in the private sector. Most of these other companies or countries don't really allow capitalism; instead, the government takes every cent it can, invests it on behalf of the country, and then pays out dividends.
And that's kind of how it is . America has a somewhat different way of thinking, and obviously it has served us well so far. And as of October 2025, BlackRock holds over $100 billion in Bitcoin ETFs. 100 billion in a single product. So when the world's most powerful asset manager suddenly does what governments have condemned for years, you know something big is shifting.
But most people don't notice anything . They keep hearing the same old song: Bitcoin is risky, Bitcoin is unsafe. Bitcoin will be banned. Really now? If BlackRock Fidelity is raking in billions while you're still waiting for some politician to give permission, then you're not being careful. You're too late.
And this is exactly where our story begins. A few years ago, in 2017-2018, governments, banks and regulatory authorities worldwide began sending out surveys . Always the same question. Will Bitcoin eventually pose a threat to the traditional monetary system? The answers sounded confident at the time .
No, too small, too volatile, meaningless. Even Moodies, the major rating agency, wrote in a report: "Cryptocurrencies are too insignificant to affect an economy ." Sounds almost cute today, doesn't it ? As of October 2025, the total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies is over 2 trillion dollars.
Bitcoin alone is moving briskly after reaching an all-time high of over 100,000, and BlackRock, this giant that manages pension funds and government bonds, now owns more Bitcoin than most nations hold in gold reserves. And the first reason why all of this is so explosive is control. Governments print money.
They decide on interest rates. A single political decision can halve your savings. But nobody can print Bitcoin, nobody can stop it, nobody can confiscate it if you hold it yourself. And that is precisely what changes the power dynamic between the state and its citizens. But before I continue, forget everything you've learned about safety .
If you think your money is safe in your bank account, then you haven't understood the game yet. The purchasing power of the euro decreases every year. Food prices are rising, energy prices are fluctuating. The official inflation rate may be 5%, but you feel it's more every day. And that doesn't just apply to us.
In countries like India, Nigeria, or Argentina, this pain was already commonplace when no one here was even talking about inflation. Indian workers began exchanging parts of their wages for Bitcoin or stablecoins as early as 2018 because their own rupee was losing value. And although the Indian government loudly announced in 2018 that it wanted to ban Bitcoin, in the end it did nothing.
No real rules, no clear laws. Today, over 150 million Indians use cryptocurrencies without authorization or permission, simply because they have no alternative. Secondly, you must understand that this development is no accident. It is the result of trust, or rather, of lost trust. Moodies confirmed in a 2024 report that the rise of cryptocurrencies threatens monetary sovereignty.
Translated, this means: "If citizens prefer to hold Bitcoin rather than the national currency, states lose power." And if you're wondering whether this is really happening, yes, right now. What almost nobody knows is that this time the impetus is not coming from Silicon Valley. He comes from below, from Latin America, from Africa, from South and Southeast Asia, from places where people have no choice.
In Nigeria, the average citizen has no confidence in the central bank. In Argentina, families exchange their salary for Bitcoin on the day it is paid out because they know it will be worth less tomorrow. In Turkey, some businesses use stablecoins to pay for transactions in order to maintain price stability .
The third point surprises most people. This silent revolution has long since reached Wall Street. While many small investors are still hesitant, institutions have long since made their decision. Larry Fink from Black Rock, Kathy Wood, Michael Sailor from Micro Strategy. They are all betting billions on Bitcoin, and they are not doing it because they love hype.
They do it because they can do the math, unlike Germany, which sold 50,000 Bitcoins. Because if you hold Bitcoin today, you're in line with the same people who control global funds. And that was unimaginable in the past. You could never do the same things as Blackrock before. But most people still think Bitcoin is speculation.
In reality, it is a defense against loss of purchasing power, against debt policies, against the creeping theft of your time. Look, the Federal Reserve has printed more money in the last 5 years than in the 50 years before that. It's no different in Europe . National debt is rising, currencies are falling, politicians talk about stability, while you see in the supermarket that your money is no longer enough .
When you see all this, do you really believe Bitcoin is risky, or is it riskier to continue believing in paper money? The fourth point: Institutional acceptance is no longer a dream of the future. BlackRock essentially had to buy real Bitcoin for every dollar it owned for its ETFs . None, no promises.
Real coins that disappear from the market. As a result, the available supply decreases further each month, and the next Helving in 2028 will halve the amount of new Bitcoin once again. Scarcity plus rising demand – that 's not a myth, that's mathematics. But this is where it gets interesting. While Western media are still talking about speculation , millions of people have long been using Bitcoin as a savings account.
Not to get rich, but to be able to survive . And while states are talking about digital central bank currencies, a completely different experiment is actually underway. The quiet disempowerment of the money monopolies. And what they don't tell you is that this movement cannot be stopped. Even China still has active crypto communities despite official bans.
Even there, people buy Bitcoin indirectly, through peer-peer networks. You ca n't ban technology when it lives on the internet. And do you know what the real turning point will be, when even governments eventually include Bitcoin in their reserves? El Salvador was just the beginning. Other countries are already discussing it, and as soon as one of the major players, perhaps a state in the Middle East or Asia, officially buys, the game will change.
You need to know, for thousands of years gold was the benchmark for security. But gold can be confiscated, transported, and stored. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is limitless. You can carry billions of dollars in a numerical code. No borders, no tariffs, no banks. Michael Sailor put it perfectly. Bitcoin is the future of money.
And that's coming from someone who holds over 600,000 Bitcoin with MicroStrategy . Not because he plays video games, but because he understands that digital ownership is the toughest form of ownership that has ever existed. If you want to store your Bitcoin and crypto offline , you can find more information in the description.
and crypto, you'll find a free video there. But before you think that's it, here comes what very few people want to believe. This movement is only just beginning. The ETF market is barely two years old and BlackRock has already raised over $100 billion. In two years, that could be twice as much. In 5 years, nobody knows for sure.
But one thing is clear: people's trust is shifting. Away from institutions and towards decentralized ownership. And you mustn't ignore that. And the reason for that is time. Every innovation follows the same pattern. First she is laughed at, then fought against, then accepted. Bitcoin is already in phase 3.
Secondly, the masses always arrive too late. She waits until the system officially gives the green light, and by then the best chances are already gone. Thirdly, this technology is not only financial, but also cultural. It changes how people think about value, possessions, and freedom. And that is the real crux of the matter.
This is not about charts or short-term gains. It's about self-determination. If you look at what's happening in India, Argentina, Nigeria, or even the USA, you'll see: people are voting with their money. They peel it off, they transform it, they take it into their own hands. What if you did the same thing before everyone else does?
Because no matter what the media says, this is not a trend. It's a transition. From control to personal responsibility, from dependence to freedom. And the question is no longer whether you will become part of it, but when. Like and subscribe if you want more tips .
Comments 0