저자: PeterLynch · 외국인
요약 보기
Peter Lynch의 '10배 주식(10 bagger)' 발굴 기준을 소개하는 교육 영상으로, 구체적 가격 전망보다 투자 원칙을 설명한다. 결론: 10배 수익 잠재력이 있는 기업은 독점적 상품/서비스, 이해 가능한 사업, 저평가(소외된) 상태, 작은 규모에서의 성장 여지를 갖춘 기업이며, 좋은 기업은 너무 일찍 팔지 말아야 한다. 첫째, 기업의 독특한 제품·서비스(해자)가 중요하다. 경쟁자를 막고 가격 결정력을 가지며 장기 수익성을 유지한다는 점을 Apple 사례로 설명한다. 둘째, 이해 가능한 사업에 투자해야 한다. Lynch의 'Know what you own' 원칙처럼 주식은 사업의 일부이므로 사업 내용을 깊이 이해해야 하며, 그래야 하락기에 패닉 매도를 피할 수 있다. 셋째, 시장의 주목을 덜 받는 기업이 유리하다. 이미 인기가 높은 주식은 가치가 많이 오른 상태일 가능성이 크고, 유명 유튜버들이 다룬 종목에는 주의가 필요하다. 넷째, 규모가 작고 성장 여지가 큰 기업을 찾아야 한다. Facebook이 10배가 되려면 약 10조 달러 시가총액이 필요하다는 예시로 대형주의 10배 상승이 어렵다고 설명한다. 다섯째, 너무 일찍 팔지 말아야 한다. 좋은 기업이 계속 잘하고 있다면 이익 실현 유혹이 있어도 보유하라는 조언이다. 'Selling your winners and holding on to your losers is like cutting your flowers and watering your weeds'라는 인용을 강조한다. Dunkin' Donuts 사례: Lynch는 이 종목으로 15배 수익을 냈으며, 품질 중심 경영, 충성 고객, 지역 기반 확장 여지, 1968년 상장 당시의 소외 상태를 근거로 제시했다. 영상 말미에서는 Walmart와 Microsoft의 상장 후 장기 보유 사례도 언급하며, 주식은 복권이 아니라 사업 지분이라는 점을 반복한다. 리스크: 개별 종목은 100%까지 손실이 날 수 있으며, Lynch 본인도 큰 실수를 여러 번 했다고 인정한다.
다듬은 글
The goal of this video is to help you find stocks that have 10x return potential. One of my favorite investors of all time, Peter Lynch, calls these type of stocks 10 baggers. These are the type of investments that pay off so well that they make investors legendary. Like Peter Lynch with his investment in Dunkin' Donuts or Warren Buffett with his investment in Coca-Cola.
Peter Lynch identified and invested numerous 10 baggers when he was the manager of the Fidelity Magellan Fund from 1977 to 1990. As a result, the fund grew from $18 million in assets when Lynch took it over to $14 billion when he left in 1990. Over this period, Lynch achieved the 29.2% average annual rate of return, which meant that $1,000 invested when Lynch started managing the fund in 1977 would have grown to $28,000 by the time he left in 1990.
In this video, we're going to listen to Lynch describe how he finds stocks with 10x return potential and then examine how he used that framework to make one of the best investments of all time, Dunkin' Donuts. But firs. Let's dive in. You look for companies that have something unique. Like an example would be Toys "R" Us when I first found that.
You know, they they only were in they only had seven or eight stores. You said to yourself, think if this concept could have two or 300 stores. Now, by nature, some of those companies might be very boring. Well, yeah, that's terrific. I look for that's great. Companies that are boring are wonderful to me.
I've done well with companies like Dunkin' Donuts. Well, companies like that they're very easy to understand. No one's going to invent a better donut somewhere in MIT. You don't have to worry about foreign influence. a Dunkin' Donuts uh company? Well, there was a company that upgraded their stores. They spent a lot of time on on the quality of their product.
They really spent a lot of time to have a China cup. Their cup was worth over a dollar instead of just having a piece of paper or plastic cup. They said, "We want to deliver something very good to the consumer." They really worked on the quality of their coffee. You know, they every 15 minutes they'd throw it away and they'd they'd cook it within 3° of the right temperature.
They really cared Could you find that in an annual report? No, you had to go visit them and talk to them. But you could find it out. You you'd say, "This is something that really makes sense." And the nice thing about it is if somebody comes up with a good donut system and they really have a great concept that's in the state of Washington, it's not going to affect Dunkin' Donuts if they're located in Virginia, if they're located in Massachusetts.
Now, how did you stumble on L'eggs? This is a product my wife said you know, it worked very good and at that point in time I I did a little bit of research and I found out the average woman goes to the supermarket about twice a week. And all the hose you've been sold in supermarkets was just junk. So, here was a company that made a good product, put it into the supermarkets, put it into the drug stores, made it readily available.
It was incredible success. It was the most successful product of the 1970s after Pampers. But Pampers was part of a very big company called Procter & Gamble. This is part of a relatively small company called Hanes. So, the stock was a huge success. It was eventually bought out by Consolidated Foods, a company who's now called Sara Lee.
If it wasn't bought out, I think it you know, would have been a 100 bagger instead of just a 10 bagger. It was a big success. At what point do you decide in a company to cut your losses? It's only if the company's doing poorly. If if you bought a company which you thought this new product was going to work or the aluminum industry was turning around and you know something about the aluminum industry.
If all of a sudden the product isn't working or the industry's getting worse. If you're wrong in the fundamentals, then you sell. If the company's doing fine and the stock goes down, that's a great opportunity. we probably you know, it's it's funny on a stock, all you can lose is 100%. I've done that.
But your great mistake is selling a good company and then doubles and then it triples and it quadruples because you make a lot of mistakes in just my two greatest mistakes I've ever made. When should you sell? Well, you go cyclical % of the United States. And you ty're going to run the compan." You got to be able to write that down and follow that.
And or many investors today in the trust issue. Yes. a or o the market. If the Dow Jones today was 1,000 or 500, Johnson & Johnson. two with no stock splits because their earnings have ump out a thousand. I sometimes get angry mail, be right even five times out of 10. 20 or 30%. So, when you buy a stock, you got to say to .
Because stocks are risky. I mean, look look at how much we lost in AT&T. Look how much we lost in Xerox. These were quality companies. You know, you can lose a lot in a stock. So, you got to say to yourself, "How much can I make?" Because I want to buy a stock if I'm right, I'm going to make a double or triple.
Does your own confidence ever get shaken? Every day I think the market's going to go up, you know. I keep calling a lot of my companies. I keep calling the companies. So, you can take advantage of the volatility in the market if you understand what you're on. Uh so, I think that's the key to element Another key element is that you have plenty of time.
People are in an unbelievable rush to buy a stock. I'll give you an example of a well-known company. Walmart went public in October of 1970. 1970, went public. Already had a great record. It had 15 years performance, great balance sheet. You could have waited 10 years saying you're a very conservative investor, you're you're not sure this Walmart can make it.
You want to check your your you see them operating in small towns, you're afraid they can only make it in seven or eight states, you want to wait till they go to more states. You keep waiting. You could have bought Walmart 10 years after it went public and made 35 times your money. If you bought it when they went public, you would have made 500 times your money, but you could wait 10 years after Walmart went public and made uh 30 over 30 times your money.
You could have waited three years after Microsoft went public and made 10 times your money. If you knew something about software, I know nothing about software. If you knew something about software, you would have said, "These guys have it. I don't care who's going to win, Compaq, IBM, I don't know who's going to win, Japanese computers.
I know Microsoft MS-DOS is the right thing." You could have bought Microsoft. Again, I'm repeating myself, stocks are not a lottery ticket. There's a company behind every stock. And you you can just watch it. You have plenty of time. People are in an amazing rush to purchase a security. They're out of breath when they call up.
You don't need to do this. Now that we've heard Peter Lynch talk about how to find stocks with 10x growth potential, let's establish five criteria that investors can use to see if a stock passes the test for a potential 10 bagger according to Peter Lynch. First off, a company needs to have a unique product or service.
This is what Warren Buffett describes as a moat. This may be the single most important thing to look for in a stock. But why is it so important? A company with a strong competitive advantage is able to fight off competitors, charge more for its product or service, and ultimately be more profitable over a longer period of time.
Take Apple for example. The company has extremely loyal customers and many people are obsessed with their products. This allows them to charge premium prices for their products and be by far the most profitable electronics company in the world. Apple's unique brand positioning makes it nearly impossible for a competitor to steal away Apple's loyal customer base.
The next criteria is look for companies you can understand. This is the backbone of the investment philosophy Lynch lays out in his best-selling book, One Up On Wall Street. He is known for his famous quote, "Know what you own." He makes the argument that stocks aren't lottery tickets, but instead they are pieces of businesses.
Over time, the performance of your investment will depend on the underlying performance of the business. Truly understanding a business will give you an edge when you're assessing the long-term growth potential of a stock. Third is look for companies that are underfollowed. Meaning that they aren't already loved by the market and investors.
If a stock is already highly followed and an investor favorite, it likely has increased in value substantially because of this. That means that if all the stock YouTubers are making videos about a particular stock, you should be cautious. Next up, and this one is an important lesson I learned from Peter Lynch.
Look for companies that are relatively small and have room to grow significantly. While companies like Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Facebook, and Google all may be great companies and great investments, it is very unlikely that these stocks will 10x from the current price. That is simply because of the law of large numbers.
Take Facebook stock for example, which recently passed $1 trillion in market cap. Assuming no share repurchases, the company would have to have a valuation of $10 trillion in order for the stock to 10x. With billions of people already with Facebook and Instagram accounts, there simply isn't enough room for the company to grow to 10x given its already large size.
Now for the final point, don't sell too early. This point can be summed up with one of my favorite Peter Lynch quotes of all time. Selling your winners and holding on to your losers is like cutting your flowers and watering your weeds. This is a mistake many investors, both new and experienced, make.
They buy a stock that doubles, and they take profits and sell out of their position. At first, they are happy with the result. However, as the stock continues to triple and quadruple, they quickly realize they sold too early. That's why it's best to follow Peter Lynch's advice to always hold a stock as long as the company is continuing to do well, even if it may seem tempting to take some profits.
Now that we've established the criteria for finding 10-baggers that Peter Lynch laid out, let's go one by one and see if these criteria apply to one of his best investments ever, Dunkin' Donuts. Dunkin' Donuts made Lynch 15 times his money. Quite an impressive return for such a simple investment. As Lynch pointed out in the clip, despite the company selling rather ubiquitous products, coffee and donuts, Dunkin' Donuts had a relatively unique business model for a low-priced restaurant.
The company's focus on quality and providing a great experience for customers helped Dunkin' Donuts develop a loyal customer base who visit the store frequently, with some even visiting every day as part of their daily routine. Additionally, once the company had entered a market and built up a customer base, it was difficult for competitor to enter that same market and steal away customers.
On the second criteria, it is clear that Peter Lynch had a deep understanding of Dunkin' Donuts' business model. Listening to him talk in the clip about the company's business model, you would think he worked as an executive of the company. But it makes sense that Lynch had such a deep knowledge of the company, considering that the company was founded in Massachusetts, just 30 minutes outside of where he lived and worked.
It is crucial to deeply understand a company before investing. This helps you avoid panic selling if the stock price falls. On the third point, Dunkin' Donuts was definitely an under-followed stock at the time. The company went public in 1968. This was during a period of time where the so-called Nifty Fifty stocks were getting almost all the attention in the stock market.
These Nifty Fifty stocks consist of 50 stocks that were investors' favorites. The 50 stocks identified represent some of the fastest-growing companies on the planet in the latter half of the 1960s. Their popularity amongst institutional and individual investors sparked a quantum shift from value investing to a growth at any price mentality.
While investors were focused on these stocks, companies like Dunkin' Donuts were able to remain under-followed by investors despite the company's great growth prospects. That leads us to our next point. At the time, Dunkin' Donuts was a fraction of the size it is today. The size of the potential market for Dunkin' Donuts was immense.
Dunkin' Donuts could theoretically open a location in every town in America and on every street corner in the major cities. This doesn't even include international expansion opportunities. Meaning the company had huge room to grow from its relatively small size when the company IPO'd in 1968. At the time, the company was mainly in select cities on the East Coast of the United States, but the company had plans to continue steadily expanding throughout the rest of the East Coast, Southeast, and Midwest of the United States.
With Dunkin' Donuts clearly meeting all the other criteria, it is apparent the company had the potential to be a 10-bagger. However, the true potential of the investment wouldn't have been realized if Peter Lynch would have sold after the stock doubled or tripled. Because he was a true buy and hold investor and focused on the long term, Lynch held onto the stock.
He truly understood the business and knew it was going to be a huge winner. So there we have it. I hope you learned something from this video. aren't already, . See you next time.
Comments 0