원문 보기
Michael Burry just did something nobody saw coming. The man who predicted 2008 before anyone else, the guy they made a movie about, just put on four of the biggest trades of his entire career on a single day. And if you're invested in the stock market right now, even in an index fund, you need to see exactly what he's betting on.
Because if Burry is right again, the next 12 months are going to be brutal for most investors and life-changing for a very small group who understand what's actually happening. Before we get into the four trades, you need to know who this guy actually is and why it matters. he made nearly 489% for his investors over the life of his original fund betting happened.
And after 2008, for almost two decades, he kept quietly running money at Scion, sometimes making brilliant calls, sometimes getting the timing wrong, but always looking for the bubbl strange. He shut Scion down entirely. He deregistered the fund, liquidated his traditional equity portfolio, . He charges $39 a month or $379 a year, and the subscriber base has grown to over 240,000 people.
What that actually means is huge. For the first time in his career, Burry is not . He's publishing them himself in real time with his full reasoning attached. And on April 10th, 2026, he published one of his most important trading posts yet. Four trades in a single day, and they tell a very specific story about where Burry thinks this market is headed.
Let's go through them one by one. Trade number one is the big one. Burry bought more puts on Nvidia. Specifically, January 2027 strike 115 puts at $3.30 per contract, on top of an existing position of January 2027 strike 100 puts from earlier. With Nvidia trading near $188 that day, these puts require the stock to fall more than 40% by January 2027 to go intrinsically in the money.
That is an aggressive, high-conviction short position on the single most loved stock in the entire market. But here's what makes this interesting. Burry's thesis isn't just AI is a bubble, it's much more specific than that. He calls it supply-side gluttony, and the core of the argument is something called the depreciation problem.
Here's how it works. When a company like Meta, Google, Microsoft, or Amazon buys Nvidia chips, they put those chips on their balance sheet as a long-term asset, and they spread the cost of that asset out over the useful life of the chip. In 2020, these companies were generally assuming their server hardware would last about three years.
By 2025, they had quietly extended that assumption to five and a half, sometimes six years, which means their reported profits go up, their apparent return on capital goes up, and the stocks go up. Except there is a massive contradiction sitting in plain sight. Nvidia itself is releasing a brand new architecture every single year.
Hopper, then Blackwell, then Blackwell Ultra, then Vera Rubin in 2026, then Vera Rubin Ultra in 2027. Jensen Huang, Nvidia's CEO, openly joked that he is the chief revenue destroyer, because every new chip makes the previous one functionally obsolete. So, the hyperscalers are depreciating hardware over six years that the company selling them admits becomes outdated in less than two.
Burry calls this one of the more common frauds of the modern era and compares it directly to the accounting scandals that blew up WorldCom in 2002. Then there's the lead time paradox. Everyone points to Nvidia's 12-month order backlog as evidence of infinite demand. Burry says that's backwards. If you knew you could buy the product with no wait in 12 months, you wouldn't get on a 12-month wait list.
The wait list exists because hyper scalers are placing orders four to seven years in advance to match data center construction timelines, not because manufacturing is permanently choked. And the cracks are starting to show. OEMs are already announcing broad availability of Blackwell Ultra, which is the exact shift Burry predicted.
His historical parallel is electricity. Between 1900 and 1910, US electricity production grew 280%, but generation capacity grew 375%. Even Edison and Westinghouse, the literal pioneers of the technology, ended up in severe financial distress. Edison was forced into a merger by J.P. Morgan. Westinghouse went bankrupt during the 1907 panic.
The infrastructure winners of a revolutionary technology do not always stay winners when supply outruns end-user monetization. Burry's argument is that Nvidia, in a decade, may look more like those companies than like the Apple or Google people are pricing it to be. Burry picked puts instead of shorting the stock directly for two specific reasons.
First, his maximum loss is limited to the premium he paid. Second, he calculated the cost of that premium at roughly 3% of notional value, which is actually less than what it would cost to borrow shares if Nvidia really started falling. He is paying a small fixed fee for the right to be very, very wrong about timing.
And if he's right, the payoff is asymmetric in the extreme. Trade number two is the opposite direction entirely. Burry bought Chinese tech stocks, a lot of them. He added significantly to his jd.com position, and he opened a brand new position of over 6% of his portfolio in Alibaba. He bought both as ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange with Alibaba trading around $127 and jd.com around $29 on the day of purchase.
And the thesis here is one of the most extreme deep value arguments you will ever see in public. Since 2021, Chinese tech has been beaten into the ground. Jack Ma got publicly disappeared after criticizing the government. The regulatory crackdown on EdTech companies wiped out billions in market cap overnight.
Western investors got terrified of something called the VIE structure, which is the offshore legal vehicle that lets foreigners own exposure to Chinese operating companies. The fear was that Beijing could void these structures at any moment and leave foreign shareholders holding worthless paper. Burry's counterargument is surgical.
Mainland Chinese citizens hold over $200 billion in those exact same VIE structured stocks through the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program. Voiding the VIE would not just punish Western hedge funds, it would vaporize the retirement savings of millions of Chinese families, trigger mass social unrest, and permanently cut China's biggest companies off from global capital.
The structure isn't safe because of legal protection. It's safe because destroying it would destroy the people doing the destroying. Mutually assured financial destruction. With that risk reframed, Burry points to a statistic that is genuinely staggering. The Hang Seng Tech Index is the only major stock index in recorded financial history since 1900 to experience a 1929 style price crash while the underlying companies kept growing earnings.
Not Japan, not the dot com crash, not the 70s Nifty 50, only Chinese tech. Alibaba has delivered an annualized return of about 4% since its 2014 IPO despite massive ecosystem expansion and continuous profitability. At its 2024 lows, it actually traded below its IPO price from a decade earlier. Today, Alibaba trades at a trailing PE of around 20 backed by over $41 billion in net cash on the balance sheet.
JD.com trades at a PE of under 15 pricing the dominant logistics network in the Eastern Hemisphere closer to a utility than a growth company. The regulatory backdrop is finally shifting, too. Xi Jinping has publicly met with private sector leaders including Jack Ma signaling a formal rehabilitation of the tech sector and the PCAOB CSRC audit inspection agreement has neutralized the immediate delisting threat under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act.
It's not a perfect setup. Pinduoduo and Douyin are taking market share aggressively in domestic e-commerce forcing Alibaba and JD into margin compressing price wars, but Burry's bet is that once the geopolitical war premium exits the market, these stocks re-rate violently. That's not a moonshot. That's mean reversion on one of the most compressed valuation groups in recorded market history.
Trade number three will confuse people who only know the 2021 meme stock story. Burry added to an already decent sized position in GameStop and his reason has absolutely nothing to do with short squeezes, Wall Street bets, or any of that retail saga. Here's what's actually on the GameStop balance sheet right now.
Over $8.8 billion in cash and highly liquid securities. 4,710 Bitcoin purchased in May 2025 for roughly $500 million under a formal treasury reserve strategy. A CEO in Ryan Cohen who back in April 2025 put another $10.78 million of his own personal cash into company shares and who has now invested about $117 million of personal funds into GameStop over time pushing his stake above 9%.
And a compensation package that only fully vests if GameStop reaches a $100 billion plus market cap. Every single incentive Cohen has is pointed at building something enormous with that cash pile. Burry describes the corporate governance as as good as it gets if one is okay with a benign dictator. That's a very specific kind of compliment.
Cohen is the chairman, the CEO, and the largest individual shareholder. He is openly saying he is pursuing an acquisition that could turn the company into a $100 billion business. He's not pretending to run a video game store anymore. He is running a cash-rich acquisition vehicle with a trading card sticker on the front.
And here is where it connects to Burry's other trades. If you believe, as Burry does, that Nvidia is overvalued and the AI capex cycle eventually corrects, you are also implicitly betting on a market dislocation. When markets dislocate, assets get cheap. Cash becomes king. And Ryan Cohen has almost nine billion dollars in cash ready to deploy in exactly that scenario.
So, GameStop is simultaneously two things. In a normal market, it's a boring, cash-rich holding company with very limited downside because the balance sheet alone supports most of the market cap. In a crash, it transforms into an offensive weapon. Cohen can move fast, buy distressed assets, and potentially pivot the company into a completely new business line at a once-in-a-decade valuation.
That's asymmetric. Very little downside from here, massive upside optionality if the rest of Burry's macro view plays out. He's not betting on a short squeeze. He's betting on a balance sheet plus a founder-operator plus a crash scenario. And he is getting paid to wait. Trade number four is the cleanest value play of the four.
Burry bought Fiserv, the payments and financial technology company that just had, by his own description, the worst trading day in its corporate history. On October 29th, 2025, Fiserv stock collapsed 44% in a single session after the company slashed its full-year revenue growth guidance from 10% down to 3.5 to 4%.
Tens of billions of market value erased in a day. The crash came after years of what Burry politely calls sins. The previous management had been aggressively pushing clients off the legacy Payeezy platform onto the new Clover system to artificially inflate growth metrics. When the real numbers finally caught up to the marketing, the market annihilated the stock.
But, here's what Burry saw that everyone else missed. A new CEO named Mike Lyons had taken over in May 2025. He used the October collapse as a chance to reset forward guidance to achievable levels, restructured the company into clearly accountable divisions under a plan called One Fiserv, and even symbolically moved the stock listing back to the Nasdaq, where it now trades under its original FISV ticker.
Volume has swollen massively since the crash as the shareholder base turns over. Weak hands exiting, value-focused investors stepping in. By April 2026, the stock was still trading around $58, deeply depressed from its pre-crash highs near $240. Burry's argument is simple. The bad news is fully priced in.
The new management is transparent, and the business itself, one of the largest payment processors in the world handling billions in daily transactions, is fundamentally unchanged. He's buying a global payments utility at a disposable razor multiple because the market is still punishing the sins of the previous CEO.
Now, here's the part you need to sit with. Burry made these four trades: short Nvidia, long Chinese tech, long GameStop, long Fiserv into one of the most euphoric market backdrops in recent memory. On April 15th, just days after Burry's trading post, the S&P 500 closed above 7,000 for the first time in history.
The Nasdaq ripped off an 11-session winning streak, its longest since 2021. The VIX, the market's fear gauge, collapsed to around 18. President Trump had just declared the US-Iran conflict was very close to over, and a Pakistan-brokered ceasefire was holding. Every single piece of sentiment was screaming risk on.
That is the exact moment Burry chose to buy puts on the market's favorite stock, load up on distressed Chinese names, hold cash-rich GameStop as a crash hedge, and bottom fish a disgraced payments processor. If you zoom out, the pattern is unmistakable. Every single position he owns is either a direct short against the AI euphoria, or a deep value trade in something that's already been crushed to the point where further downside is structurally limited.
He is not positioned for the rally. He is positioned for what happens after. And this is why studying his moves matters, even if you don't want to copy them exactly. Burry is not always right. His 2023 $1.6 billion bet against the S&P 500 and Nasdaq got closed at a significant loss because the market kept rallying.
His timing is frequently early. That's a real documented risk. But the framework, supply gluts, extended depreciation schedules, multiple compression, mean reversion, asymmetric payoffs, is the same framework that let him see 2008 when almost nobody else did. The takeaway isn't do exactly what Burry is doing.
The takeaway is that one of the best macro contrarians of the last 25 years looked at the S&P at 7,000, looked at Nvidia near $190, looked at the VIX at 18, and decided the right move was defense, hedges, and deep value while everyone else was chasing the breakout. History usually remembers the people who zigged when the crowd zagged, and right now Burry is zigging extremely hard.
Comments 0