저자: 미상 · 외국인
요약 보기
영상은 세계경제포럼(WEF)이 디지털ID·토큰화 등 4차 산업혁명을 통해 금융을 통제하려 한다고 주장하며, 스테이블코인과 CBDC를 동일시하고 비트코인 탈중앙성 신화를 비판한다. 블랙록 CEO 래리 핑크가 WEF 임시공동의장을 맡고 블랙록이 약 74만 BTC를 보유·추가 매입 중이라는 점을 근거로 들어 비트코인 집중과 기관 지배 위험을 경고한다. 마이크로스트래티지 등 비트코인 옹호 진영을 비판하고 전반적으로 음모론적 시각을 전개한다.
다듬은 글
We have been worried for years about the World Economic Forum's actions regarding our financial system since they are essentially reimagining the wheel to use modern technology to control everything we do. Almost everyone appears to have forgotten how closely the World Economic Forum is linked to all of these major players, including Black Rockck.
Of course, we discussed the fourth industrial revolution in a recent video. We didn't go into great detail, but if you're interested in learning more about the fourth industrial revolution, the World Economic Forum has a comprehensive list of all the things that go into it. And I do believe that they have as well, they had a diagram about this on their website once, but it was made by Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum's first chairman.
By the way, this is what I meant when I said that they had this diagram-l like thing. This is the diagram for the fourth industrial revolution. And if we look at this, it covers practically everything we discuss about cryptocurrency daily. You have a digital identity over here. For instance, a key component in making this a reality is digital identity.
And whether you support digital identification or not, you can imagine what some of the major players in the crypto industry are promoting because of their current involvement, digital persona. We may also see AI playing a role in this 3D printed technology as well as once more 3D printing is a major development that is currently being promoted.
If we examine AI itself, we also have reliable and moral AI. For example, all of these things are now being prioritized. Furthermore, many people believe that this was not pre-arranged, which makes it absurd. For years and years and years, this has been a part of the plan. It dates back more than 10 years.
And you know who has been the main force behind this? Yes, exactly. The World Economic Forum. If you still believe that stable coins and all of these things happened for no reason at all, guess what? No. Years have been spent pushing it. The World Economic Forum has been praising stable coins because of this.
The financial system is about to undergo a permanent transformation thanks to stable coins and blockchain technology. Yes, since the new financial system includes this, the fourth industrial revolution includes this. We are aware of this as blockchain is present in the fourth industrial revolution. All of the components of tokenization, decentralized finance, and digital identification are visible when we click on blockchain.
It's kind of crazy. But once more, what have we always been told about cryptocurrency, specifically by the Bitcoin Maxi? Additionally, this is the reason I consistently advise against listening to these Bitcoin maxims. They do not know whatsoever of the origins of the technology. For example, many continue to believe that Satoshi is a renegade developer who invented Bitcoin to circumvent the established system.
Oh, and here's a technique to combat both this and inflation. And listen, Bitcoin has done a great job of increasing in value thus far since it is the top cryptocurrency project. It has always been the one that stands out from the rest. It was the initial one and still everyone believes that a random individual developed Bitcoin.
The level of success it achieved is astounding. No, it comes to mind when we think about cryptocurrency, particularly Bitcoin. We all exclaim, "Oh, it's fully decentralized. It is beyond anyone's control. Your transactions are not visible to anybody you know. They are unable to follow you. They are unable to track it.
Everything may be traced back to your wallet." As I have stated numerous times, even with onchain transactions, this is the main reason why people like Zack XBT, for instance, have been able to follow and detect scams and fraud in the industry. It all stems from Wallace. You could follow and follow nearly everything.
Additionally, it is possible to track and trace it back to centralized exchanges, which are now mostly KYC. So once more, when we consider Bitcoin, the blockchain and cryptocurrency in general, was it truly that revolutionary leap to break free from the established system and be completely untraceable?
No. No. Indeed, I really believe that Bitcoin and the development of cryptocurrency were necessary to bring us to this moment. The initial concept of crypto was never realized. These Bitcoin maxis are all still pushing it. These are the same Bitcoin maxis who have praised players like Black Rockck for acquiring and keeping a sizable portion of the cryptocurrency.
At this point, the entire space begins to transform. Talking about that, let's move on to the major upgrade because this is an incredible site. The most important news of the week is right here, almost unnoticed by the media. Larry Frink takes Klouse Schwab's place at the World Economic Forum. This is a huge thank you to Marty Party.
Indeed, the breakdown is presented here. The World Economic Forum names Frink in place of Schwab. By the way, this is the temporary chair. The World Economic Forum's temporary co-chairs, Larry Frink and Andre Hoffman, have actually released a statement. Here is the complete analysis straight from the World Economic Forum.
If you'd like, you can read it. In essence, we are privileged to assume this leadership position temporarily during a critical juncture for the World Economic Forum. We anticipate the future with clarity, purpose, and faith in the forum's long-term mission. As the organization embarks on a new chapter, even if the world is more complicated and divided than ever, there is a bigger need than ever for a platform that unites government, business, and civil society.
We think the forum has the potential to be a special kind of collaboration catalyst that builds trust, finds common ground, and transforms discussion into action. Very intriguing. We're still hopeful. The form has the chance to promote global cooperation in a way that not only creates wealth, but also disperses it more widely.
This new approach may advance the interests of workers and stakeholders worldwide, while also promoting open markets and national agendas. The absurd thing about this is that we are discussing something that happened 2 years ago. I adore how Bitcoin Maxis argues that keeping Bitcoin is the only way to avoid CBDC's.
The Bitcoin of today is very different from that of 2009. The initial intent of Bitcoin, in my opinion, was not to celebrate and welcome Black Rockck's ETF introduction. Fearful of CBDC control but unafraid of a limited resource that has essentially priced out retail. I don't understand why one of the biggest companies applied for a Bitcoin ETF.
The majority of stuff in your immediate vicinity is owned by BlackRock. Additionally, don't assume that they will own the largest portion of Bitcoin. Rethink your thought. Soon corporations will rule Bitcoin. This is ridiculous because of CBDC's. What makes CBDC's intriguing? Everyone's opinion of CBDC's has been unfavorable.
CBDC's are hated by all. What are they celebrating though? Stable coins. Yes, since stable coins are unquestionably not programmable, let's applaud them. Without a doubt, they cannot be tracked or traced. Undoubtedly, they are not a CBDC that was only issued by a private business. I find it absurd that people are unaware of what is taking place here.
Stable coins and CBDC's are fundamentally the same thing. They just have different names. We're also happy that Black Rockck has a Bitcoin ETF. Yes, even Michael Sailor. We only go back to 2024. Larry Frink is a supporter of Bitcoin. This is being promoted by Michael Sailor, one of the biggest Bitcoin bulls right now.
Once more, pay close attention. Now, I I know you have been a leader in willing to embrace crypto. You have made it so that people can be in Bitcoin. We hear that you are thinking about Ethereum. These are incredible things. How now Black Rockck is not known as a uh a gunslinger by any means. So you obviously must believe that this maybe is an alternative.
Is this an alternative uh in order to be able because of the a deficit maybe something longterm people should have? Absolutely. Um as you know I was a skeptic. Yes. I, you know, I was a proud skeptic and I studied it and learned about it and I came away saying, okay, you know, my opinion 5 years ago was wrong.
Here's my opinion stated. This is what I believe in today. I believe the opportunity today. I believe Bitcoin is legitimate. I'm not trying to say there's not misuses like everything else. But it is a legitimate financial instrument that allows you to have maybe uncorrelated, non-correlated type of returns.
I believe it is an instrument that you invest in when you're more frightened. Though it is an instrument when you believe that co countries are debasing their currency, de debasing their currency by excess deficits and some countries are. I believe we have um countries where you're frightened of your everyday existence and have an opportunity to invest in in a a something that is outside your country's uh you know control then you can have more financial control.
And so I'm a a major believer that there is a role for Bitcoin and in portfolios. I believe you're going to see that as an as one of the asset classes that we all look at. I look at it as digital gold as I said before and I do believe there's a there's a there's a real need for everyone to look at it as as one alternative to I would say the optimism that I have in the world.
If you want to hedge hope, Bitcoin is not a an instrument for hope unless you're hopeful you're going to make a lot of money on it. But I I look at it as a vehicle in which you're expressing your your financial acumen in something that you're more frightened of the world. You're more frightened of your existence.
And I believe there's a great industrial use for it. And I and I think a lot of people are missing that. I couldn't agree more. I changed my mind about it when you did. You my thinking it was like uh he didn't believe it. So I can't believe it. I want to thank Larry Frink for the message of optimism.
Thanks and also for a great quarter. Larry Frink is the co-founder, chairman, and CEO of BlackRock. I think the most important investment company in the world. Thank you. Thanks, guys. Carl. Yes, exactly. The Bitcoin marketing campaign. It has accelerated. All right. In my opinion, it has also become more heated in the past few years.
And for what reason are we celebrating? In addition to holding 740,000 Bitcoin, Black Rockck now purchases 1340,000. Indeed, it must be really bullish. These Bitcoin maxis are celebrating Black Rockck's acquisition of a significant quantity of Bitcoin. What's crazy about this? Do you know the August 17th update is available here?
As of right now, Michael Sailor in Justin Black Rockck Strategy has 1 about 4 million Bitcoin, which is valued at roughly 162 billion. That amounts to about 6.5% of the entire Bitcoin supply. Yes, this is absolutely not a cause for concern. What makes Michael Sailor so confident that Larry Frink believes in Bitcoin, by the way?
Well, the reason for this is that with 5.3% of Micro Strategy stock, BlackRock is the third largest shareholder. Take a look at all of the Bitcoin mining companies. If you think this is insane, are you able to guess who holds nearly all of them? You're correct. Black Rockck. Black Rockck has fully committed to Bitcoin, which is why they are so optimistic about it.
They currently own a significant portion of it, and it will only continue to expand from here. Furthermore, it appears that some of these Bitcoin maxi accounts like Simply Bitcoin are suddenly recognizing the danger of this. Larry Frink of Black Rockck is now serving as the World Economic Forum's acting co-chair.
Wall Street is under his authority. He currently owns Davos and his ETF already has over 700,000 Bitcoin. This poses a risk. Yes, that is very alarming. I believe that anyone considering this with the narrow-minded perspective of, oh, I just want to make money, which is what most of these Bitcoin maxis have, is just concerned with who will purchase our Bitcoin today.
This is really alarming, particularly in light of the coordinated effort to sell Bitcoin endlessly. Really, it's alarming. This is the reason I keep thinking about Michael Sailor, who seems to be utterly enamored with Bitcoin at random. And no one seems to be challenging this at all. Michael Sailor has now also advocated for Black Rockck to acquire a sizable stake in Bitcoin.
Many members of the Bitcoin community have been applauding Black Rockck's acquisition of a significant amount of Bitcoin. And that brings me full circle to my initial contention. The majority of retail has been nearly priced out by this limited resource. Furthermore, when a company like BlackRock, whose CEO is presently serving as the interim chair of the World Economic Forum, is mentioned, we're not expected to be worried at all.
The World Economic Forum, which first promoted the fourth industrial revolution, which also involves digital IDs and tokenization of everything, is the same one that has been advocating for the Great Reset. Just consider how absurd this timeline is. You know, this wasn't just some wild revolution brought about by a rogue developer who made Bitcoin.
It's always been a plan. No, this has always been the work of these names. And as of right now, I believe that this synchronized shift has been evident over the past 12 months. Everyone seems to believe that Trump's promotion of cryptocurrency after taking office is the reason for all of this. All of this was pre-arranged.
For this reason, in only the past few months, we have begun to witness a significant change. This is the cherry on top of the cake. Larry Frink will serve as the World Economic Forum's temporary co-chair. I just think this is insane. Having said that, I hope you all found this video entertaining. Please feel free to like, subscribe, and enable notifications if you
Comments 0