원문 보기
When Michael Berry speaks, retail traders and macro analysts pause. The hedge fund titan, who is known for making a fortune by predicting the 2008 subprime mortgage crash, has spent the better part of two decades establishing himself as the ultimate adversary of Wall Street. However, over the past three years, investors who actually heeded Berry's apocalyptic warnings have suffered catastrophic opportunity costs.
In 2023, Berry purchased approximately $1.6 billion in conditional put options against the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, but suffered a brutal 40% loss as tech stocks began one of the biggest bull runs in financial history. Shortly thereafter, he bought put options on semiconductor ETFs and mega-cap tech leaders, watching helplessly as the chip sector rose.
Investors who took Berry's advice and stayed away missed out on generations of wealth creation as they watched Nvidia , Palantir, and the broader semiconductor indexes generate trillions of dollars in new market capitalization. Undeterred by these multi-million dollar mistakes, Berry's latest September disclosures show that he is redoubling his efforts against the rise of artificial intelligence.
Berry considers the current hardware boom to be extremely fragile, saying the technology index is historically overvalued and heavily weighted toward the top. But a close look at his individual short-term goals suggests that Michael Berry may once again be standing squarely in front of a relentless industrial freight train.
The centerpiece of Berry's updated short-term playbook is a fast-paced aggressive bet against memory chip giant Micron Technology. Berry bases his bearish stance on recent comments from Acer CEO Jason Chen, who publicly questioned claims of an indefinite memory shortage. Berry argues that while high-speed LPDDR5 and advanced DDR5 remain densely distributed, legacy nodes such as DDR4 are already suffering from serious structural oversupply, with more sellers than buyers.
He argues that the expansion of production by Chinese memory manufacturers will overwhelm global supply chains, destroying average selling prices and destroying gross margins in the industry. However, Berry's brief thesis ignores the fundamental strength of Micron's current operating business. Trading at around $1,096 per share with a staggering market cap of $1.24 trillion, Micron stock is not a fragile, low- yield cyclical stock.
This is an indispensable pillar of high-speed memory (HBM) required for AI server clusters. Over the past 12 months, Micron has generated over $90 billion in revenue and $50 billion in net income, boasting a net margin of 55.9% and an impressive return on invested capital of 67.6%. Wall Street analysts predict that Micron's financial earnings will increase sharply, resulting in the stock trading at a forward P/E ratio below 13x and a PEG ratio of only 0.04 to 0.58.
Shorting a company that generates $26 billion in annual free cash flow while its forward P/E is at a significant discount to the broader market is repeating the same mistake Burry made with tech in 2023, confusing normal commodity cycles with structural multi-year hardware expansion. The second direct target of Burry's short sales is corporate analytics giant Palantir Technologies.
Having previously purchased March put options with a strike price in the low to mid- $100 range, Berry has expanded his short position on Palantir as the stock trades near record highs of around $184 per share. Berry's " bearish" stance is based solely on traditional valuation multiples, arguing that Palantir's soaring market capitalization, now in excess of $ 425 billion, is an unsustainable speculative bubble.
However, the bet against Palantir was one of the riskiest deals on Wall Street in the last 2 years. Investors who heeded Berry's earlier warnings and avoided Palantir lost out on shares that rose from less than $20 to more than $175, a historic multiple of earnings. The fundamental flaw in Berry's short bet is that Palantir's operating leverage is growing even faster than its stock price.
Palantir's artificial intelligence platform , AIP, has sparked a commercial collapse, leading to triple-digit revenue growth for its corporate division in the US. The company currently generates a GAAP operating margin of around 47% and maintains a world-class 40- point rule of thumb of over 150 %. As enterprise software budgets shift significantly toward deploying artificial intelligence systems, Palantir operates less as an overvalued software stock than as a corporate monopoly.
Selling Palantir at a discount solely because its current market price looks expensive ignores the fact that GAAP earnings are growing exponentially every quarter. By focusing on Nebius Group, Burry is betting against the viability of specialized providers of fast neo-cloud infrastructure. Burry sees Nebius' massive capital spending and debt offerings as evidence of a speculative dilution trap.
His thesis suggests that as GPU availability normalizes, spot prices for AI computing rentals will fall, leaving neo-cloud operators burdened with depreciating hardware assets and serious unusable balance sheets. And again , the actual performance contradicts Burry's apocalyptic narrative. Nebius Group shares soared to over $236 per share, boosting its market capitalization to $66.4 billion, up 180% from last year.
Nebius is not an undercapitalized startup. This is a hyper-efficient infrastructure machine. In its latest operating update, Nebius showed a 454% year-over- year increase in revenue, bringing its annual revenue to $3.0 billion, while maintaining an adjusted EBITDA margin of around 50%. Most importantly, Nvidia owns a direct strategic stake in Nebius, which guarantees the company priority access to flagship GPU architectures .
With data center contract values exceeding $20 million per megawatt and payback periods well under 24 months, Nebius is now generating huge cash flows. By shorting Nebius shares , Berry is betting against the cloud backbone that powers the global deployment of artificial intelligence, exposing his portfolio to serious short positions as Nebius continues to beat its profit targets.
Rather than limiting his bearish outlook to individual stocks, Berry expanded his short campaign to the broader semiconductor market by selling shares of the Fast Analytical iShares Semiconductor ETF. Berry sees SOXX as the best indicator for an overvalued, high- yield technology sector that is poised for a macroeconomic contraction.
By selling a short ETF position, he is effectively betting against a basket of the world's leading chipmakers, including Broadcom, AMD, Qualcomm and Nvidia. History shows that selling short positions in a semiconductor index during a period of active technological development is a serious losing proposition.
When Berry made similar bets against semiconductor ETFs in late 2023, the index rose more than 60% over the following quarters, wiping out his option premiums. Today, SOXX trades for around $530-$570 per share, with assets under management exceeding $48 billion. Unlike previous tech bubbles, which were driven by unprofitable dot-com ideas, today's semiconductor ETF is supported by record corporate balance sheets.
The ETF is currently trading at a forward P/E ratio of around 20X, which is a reasonable valuation multiple considering that consensus estimates are projecting 40% earnings growth in the semiconductor sector. Selling short positions on SOXX means betting that global demand for computing power will suddenly grind to a halt, an assumption that directly contradicts the hundreds of billions of dollars in reduced capital expenditures made by major technology hyperscalers through the end of 2028.
When analyzing individual short target positions by Michael Berry, a clear pattern emerges. Whether he's shorting Micron due to commodity price concerns, Palantir due to valuation multiples, Nebius due to capital intensity, or SOXX due to macroeconomic heaviness, Berry consistently fights fundamental growth.
While his 2008 mortgage short positions cemented his status as a financial legend, his recent history proves that facing exponential technological shifts can be financially devastating. Investors who stayed away because of Berry's earlier warnings paid a huge price in lost returns. And judging by the immense cash flow strength of his new short targets, following his latest bearish trades could prove just as costly.
Comments 0