저자: 부자오빠 · 한국인
요약 보기
TQQQ(나스닥100 3배)와 SOXL(반도체 3배) 중 무엇이 나은지 비교. 발표자는 TQQQ가 종목 수(100개)와 대형주 비중 때문에 더 안정적이고 2012년 이후 수익률도 높다고 설명. SOXL은 30개 반도체 종목으로 변동성이 커 안정성이 낮다고 평가. 다만 4차 산업혁명 수혜 기대로 SOXL 비중을 두고, 최종적으로는 두 종목을 분산 투자하되 TQQQ 비중을 더 높게 두는 방식을 제시. 한쪽만 택한다면 TQQQ 쪽을 추천.
다듬은 글
Hello, I am working on this. Actually, if you look at the top net buying stocks in that market, TQ, SXL, and Tesla always dominate the top spots. That shows just how popular they are. I have invested in them myself, and they are truly attractive. For convenience, I will refer to TQ QQ, TQ SXL, and Tesla as "Sorry." Now, I am sure you are having a lot of trouble deciding which stock to invest in.
In the case of TQ, it is technology-focused and invests in the top 200 companies. It consists entirely of 100% semiconductor companies, and the number of stocks is only 30. While both share the commonality of 3x leverage, the underlying indices themselves differ quite significantly. Logically, which one is more stable?
Naturally, TQ is much more stable. Just looking at the sheer number of stocks, there are a whopping 100 companies. That is more than three times the number commonly mentioned. Furthermore, those 100 stocks are made up of truly formidable companies. For example, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Tesla—the world's best companies that have solidified their position—are included as defensive stocks.
In this way, among the total of 100 companies, the top Investment is made in only 10 opportunities, accounting for 52% of the models. This means the investment is focused primarily on ultra-blue-chip stocks. Therefore, the fundamental stability is bound to be excellent. As for Soksul, since it is composed solely of semiconductor companies, almost all mega-cap B-tag companies are excluded.
For example, companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Google—oh right, none of these mega-corporations are included in Soksul. Of course, companies like Nvidia or Microsoft have very high ratings and are stable, but they cannot be compared to stocks like Apple or Microsoft. The basic weight class is completely different.
Since it consists of only 30 semiconductor companies, stability is inevitably somewhat lower, and volatility is fundamentally high. Coincidentally, both stocks were launched for the first time in 2012; they were released around March 2010. Surprisingly, however, if you look at the 2012 records, TQ, which shows superiority in stability, also has better returns than Soksul.
Looking at TQ's returns from launch to the present, the positive yield is 6,500%, while Soksul yields about 2,808%. There is a huge difference. TK offers better stability, and even has a higher rate of return. Anyone looking at this would have no choice but to side with TK. In fact, I am investing in the "Conquest" (2) stock, and when evaluating objectively as a real investor, it is true that the "special effect" feels much more stable than the superstitions suggest.
But why invest in the "secular" stock? Of course, there is a reason. It is because I am convinced that semiconductors are the biggest beneficiaries of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Since the number of stocks is small and light, if a major bull market arrives, the profits will likely be beyond imagination.
Of course, conversely, if a major bear market comes, well, the returns might be... well, but honestly, you can't know which stock will surge ahead. That is why, to prevent regret and because you never know how well either stock will perform, I decided that diversifying my investment in both is better in many ways.
They say Doti Q is good for completeness, and since TK has even ranked better over the past 12 years, I decided to go all-in and concentrate my investment like that. But imagine how much I would regret it if, 10 years from now, its performance turned out to be several times better. I probably wouldn't be able to sleep well because of the stomach ache.
It seems the same. So, to keep it very simple, since both are good stocks, let's just straddle the line. Both seem likely to surge recently anyway, and since you don't know which one will come out next, when you're torn like this, I think investing half and half—like half fried chicken, half seasoned chicken, half jajangmyeon, and half jjamppong—is the best approach.
Well, it's not exactly a split, but I do have a higher weighting in TQ. Since TQ holds a significant advantage in stability, I found myself debating whether to increase my weighting in TQ as well. So, for those who are really struggling to decide, I think you should just allocate your investments appropriately according to your personal investment style.
However, if you absolutely insist on sticking to just one of the two stocks, personally, I think Key Q is better than the superstition surrounding it. Okay, I think that covers it well, so I'll wrap up the video briefly. Thank you.







Comments 0