저자: Conor Invests │ Investor Center · 외국인
다듬은 글
What if the hottest AI stocks are actually a ticking time bomb? Legendary investor Ray Dalio, founder of the world's largest hedge fund, Bridgewater Associates, sees unsettling parallels between today's AI frenzy and history's biggest bubbles. And he would know Dalio predicted past crashes and managed over $150 billion at his peak.
So when he says the market feels frothy, investors pay attention. This video unpacks what Dalio thinks is really inflating the AI boom and why that could mean trouble for your portfolio. There's a twist. It has less to do with the AI's tech and more to do with something structural that has changed in the economy.
Which makes you wonder, could the same fuel that's propelling these stocks upwards also be setting the stage for a hard crash? Let's listen to Dalio lay it out and pay close attention to how he compares today to the late 1920s. There have been a lot of discussions around bubbleicious conditions in the AI space in particular in that slice of the market.
Do you see that there is some sort of excess building when you look at history and how this has always played out whether it's a dot bubble or whether it's the tulips over in Amsterdam? I mean, is this something that feels frothy to you? Yes, this is something that feels frothy to me. How do you how do you
How do you That's a straight answer. That's fantastic. I think that was brilliant. I wonder how do you see it evolving? I mean because there is this great promise, right? It's sort of the idea that the internet did come to fruition and and change the world. AI might change the world, but it certainly will, but you're asking history um on um at each of the times the greatest technological revolutions were taking place during those times.
In other words, the late 20s for example was there were more patents, more inventions in the world and so on. And if you you know you could take 2000 or those types of period a lot of them are dependent there is an interdependency between the uh capital markets and these in terms of funding and those types of things.
So we have to look at valuations too right. Um I would say in terms of let's say u AI valuations and and so on I think it's more in the in areas of applications than um than uh let's say uh the supercalers themselves. I'm not I don't wouldn't want to be short the supercalers. I just um but if I'm thinking about um what what's going it's going to be in the users either the users of those technologies becoming more effective and so the their profits will be better and so on or those who will provide the platforms for the effective use of those.
I think that that's an area of greater opportunity. Dalio just confirmed it. Yes, parts of the AI market look frothy, maybe even bubbish. His historical parallel hits hard. In the late 1920s, innovation was exploding with record patterns and new industries. Yet, that era ended with breadlines and soup kitchens.
Why do even real tech revolutions come often with financial bubbles? When something like AI promises to change the world, investors flood in like Black Friday shoppers at Best Buy. Their money funds these nent technologies. It's an interdependency. Bold ideas need capital. In the boom times, capital flows like water from a broken dam.
That's why Dalio says, "Look at valuations." Right now, AI excitement has investors paying prices that would make even lottery winners blush. Valuations have rocketed off the charts. The 10 largest S&P 500 companies, many riding the AI wave, now sport price to earnings ratios higher than at the peak of the 1990s.com bubble.
These top 10 companies make up nearly 40% of the entire S&P 500. If you think you're diversified in an index fund, think again. Almost half of your money is effectively betting on the AI mega cap story continuing. Let's make this concrete. Jennifer is a software engineer in Austin, and she puts $1,000 monthly into her S&P 500 index for retirement.
She thinks she's playing it safe, but 400 of every deposit flows straight into just 10 companies. Mostly AI plays trading at nosebleleed valuations. In a normal environment, these companies might trade at 20 times earnings. Today, try 35 to 50 times. If valuations normalize, Jennifer's safe index fund could drop 30% overnight.
Her $100,000 retirement account becomes $70,000 while she's sleeping. Look at history. In the late 1990s, anything with dot flew high. Cisco Systems, a real profitable tech giant, saw its stock soar to absurd heights by 2000. After the bubble burst, Cisco's stock didn't reach those 2000 highs again until 2024.
Even two decades later, despite Cisco systems making real money, anyone who bought at the peak was underwater for almost a quarter of a century. Even revolutionary technology can be a terrible investment if you overpay. Dalio hints at this when he suggests the real opportunities are in the applications.
Think Home Depot using AI to predict what you'll buy before you need it, not the flashy startup promising to build artificial general intelligence. And real quick, if you're enjoying this content, please like and subscribe. It's the best way to help the channel. Now, back to Dalio. What's pumping so much money into this market in the first place?
Dalio has an answer that goes beyond tech. It reaches into how wealth is distributed and how the Federal Reserve has been pulling its levers. Let's hear Dalio explain the split in the economy that's pouring gasoline into the fire. Do you think it's appropriate for the Fed to be cutting rates right now?
I think um I think the picture on cutting rates um is slightly mixed. Um um so and it has to do with the split in the economy and it has to do with split in capital markets. um which means um you're trying to look at the economy as a whole, but you what you have is in certain sections of the economy, you have an enormous amount of liquidity, enormous amount of wealth.
Things are like if you're in the top 1% of anything, you know, or which is the top 1% of the income earners, the one top 1% of the stocks, um NI and so on so forth. Wow, there's a tremendous amount of liquidity and and fantastic and so uh you would say if anything you'd worry more about the bubble and how you start to pull the you know the punch bowl that kind of thing.
Um and but we have a very diverse economy. So um if you're looking at let's say the bottom 60% of the population um and the conditions of the bottom 60% of the bomb population and labor markets and so on then you have a very very different uh issue. I don't think monetary policy at all is going to be able to do that.
I think that there's a strong um situation where, you know, the the natural instinct is uh if um if things aren't exactly like I would like and I'd like to make them better, I should ease monetary policy. Okay? So, I mean, that's now we've learned that, right? Because every time you you do that and then things go up and people are happy and and so on, but there's a cost in doing that, right?
The cost in doing that is that there's um you know one man's debts are another man's assets and so when you artificially lower the interest rate so that it is not attractive in a sense to hold as an asset and it's very attractive to borrow and buy things that creates an imbalance. So I think that um uh I I think that discipline is not something that anybody seems to want and yet I think it's needed.
Dalio just revealed America's dirty secret. We're living in two completely different economies under one roof. Picture a luxury penthouse where champagne flows endlessly while the basement floods with debt. While he says the top 1% have an enormous amount of liquidity. Here's what that looks like. Apple sits on $55 billion in cash.
Microsoft $100 billion. Meanwhile, 64% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. From early 2020 to early 2022, the US money supply exploded by about 40%. All that money had to go somewhere. The S&P doubled from its 2022 low to the end of 2021. The benefits were incredibly skewed. By 2022, the wealthiest 10% of Americans owned 93% of all stock market wealth.
The top 1% alone held 54% of equities. When the Fed threw a party by lowering interest rates and buying bonds, the top 1% drunk Dom Don Perinon while everyone else got to drink tap water. When money is essentially free for those with access, it creates asset bubbles. Exactly what we're seeing in AI stocks.
Check out this chart. It shows the price of the S&P 500 alongside the cumulative New York Stock Exchange margin debt. Margin debt, money borrowed to buy stocks, hit an all-time high at $1.13 trillion recently. That's like every American borrowing $3,400 to gamble on stocks. Every time we've seen a spike like this, 2000, 2007, 2021, it was followed by a nasty market crash.
This is Dalio's unbalanced. Ultra low rates made borrowing cheaper than a Netflix subscription for the wealthy. So, they leveraged up to chase gains. But the bottom 60% weren't buying Nvidia with cheap loans. They were choosing between groceries and gas. The Fed's easy money inflated a bubble in assets without healing the real economy for the majority.
The Federal Reserve is trapped like a mouse between two cats. If it raises rates to call the bubble, it hurts borrowers and could trigger a recession. If it cuts rates to help struggling families, it feeds more cash into the pen houses, inflating the bubble until it explodes. What's the endgame if nobody has the discipline Dalio says is needed?
One possibility, the bubble keeps inflating until something breaks on its own. As Dalio hints, one man's debt is another man's asset. If lenders pull back, those assets can plummet faster than crypto in a bare market. Watch the credit conditions. If you see banks tightening lending or interest rates spiking, that could be the pin that pricks the bubble.
With over a trillion dollars in margin loans on Wall Street, anything that makes those loans expensive will force selling. A broad sell-off would hit everyone. Remember how 40% of the index is just the top 10 AI stocks. A crash in those could send the entire market into a tail spin. The liquidity illusion means the market's gains might not be as solid as they look.
They're propped up by the wealthy's ability to keep pouring more money into the market. Now, to be fair, AI really is a transformative technology. Dalio isn't denying that. Some AI companies today will end up as the Amazons and Googles of tomorrow, but the survivors will only reward investors who didn't overpay during the hype phase.
Dalio's point about looking at the user of AI is gold. businesses that harness AI to cut costs or boost sales, Walmart using AI to stock shelves before items run out, or FISA using AI to develop drugs in half the time. Those might see tangible profit growth. That's different from a startup burning $10 million monthly on GPU rentals with no path to profit.
As an investor, how can you navigate this? Well, first, heed the warning signs. Absurd valuations, concentrated gains in a handful of stocks, and lots of borrowing to buy in. These signals suggest caution is warranted. If you're considering an AI investment, ask yourself, am I buying at a price that assumes near perfection?
Could I stomach a 50% draw down and still believe in the long-term story? If not, maybe step back. This bubble is underpinned by a decadesl long experiment in easy money that showered riches at the top. That can't run forever. When the tide of liquidity goes out, we'll see who built a real business and who is swimming naked.
There's also a societal angle. A blow up when inequality is stark can lead to public anger, political upheaval, or harsh policy responses. Dalia has warned that a bust among big wealth gaps could be socially and politically disruptive. Are you prepared for a world where policy makers might step in hard after a crash?
Investors might face new taxes or rules in the aftermath. Ray Dalio sees the AI stock craze as part of a bigger story. One where too much money in too few hands is distorting the market. The AI revolution is real, but the liquidity illusion means prices can race far ahead of reality. Eventually, either fundamentals catch up or prices come down.
Use Dalio's test. Look at what you're investing in. Is it supported by real earnings and real usage or just by interdependency with easy capital? If it's the latter, be careful. Every bubble in history popped or gradually deflated to rational levels. The winners are those who either avoided the carnage or grabbed solid businesses from the wreckage at sensible prices.
My mission is to make sure that you're in that winning circle. As Dalio might put it, the goal is to stay ahead of the cycle, not get crushed by it. Subscribe for more content like this every week.
Comments 0