원문 보기
There is now a figure on the books of the Federal Reserve that should not exist in a rational financial system. The United States government estimates its gold reserves at $422 per ounce. Not 4000 , not 4100. $422. This figure was set in 1973 and has not changed since then. Even when gold is trading above $4,100 an ounce in the real world today.
Do you understand what this means? This means that the richest and most powerful government on Earth has 260 million ounces of gold and pretends for accounting purposes that it is worth 11 billion, when the real market value is closer to a trillion. This gap, this trillion-dollar gap between fiction and reality, is exactly the gap that a government drowning in debt eventually decides to close.
And there is growing evidence, real evidence, not internet noise, that suggests the Trump administration may be preparing to shut it down. Not anytime soon, maybe within a few months. I want to talk to you about this carefully today because this topic has been poorly covered on the Internet. You've probably seen this crazy version before.
Gold jumped to $20,000 overnight. Secret statement from July 4th. Some kind of financial reset that will destroy the dollar as we know it. I'll tell you right now that most of this is noise. And some are outright fabrications designed to sell you a subscription or a pack of coins. But beneath this noise, there is a real mechanism, a real piece of legislation going through Congress.
Real comments from the current Treasury Secretary and real research from the Federal Reserve that point in the same direction. My job today is to separate what's actually happening from what you're just being sold, and then let you decide what that means for your money. Let's start with what actually happened.
Legislation is currently passing through Congress that would create a national strategic reserve of Bitcoin. Hidden within this legislation is wording about how the government will pay for it. And the mechanism being discussed is a revaluation of the Treasury's gold reserves from that old book value of $42 to something closer to the current market price.
This is not a rumor made up by a gold dealer trying to sell you a coin. It is contained in the text of the bill itself . And that's what makes it more than just a topic for discussion. Earlier this year, a senior economist for the Federal Reserve Board of Governors published a study on the history of official gold reserve revaluation, how other countries have done it , and what happens to the government's balance sheet when this happens .
When the Federal Reserve itself publishes research on this very mechanism, it suggests that the conversation inside the building has gone far beyond the hypothetical. Has this happened before in America? Yes. And this is the part that almost no one talks about. In 1934, at the height of the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt used these very powers under the Gold Reserve Act to revalue American gold from $2,067 per ounce to $35 per ounce.
Overnight, with the stroke of a pen, the value of every ounce held in the Treasury increased by almost 70%. This single action strengthened the government's balance sheet, effectively devalued the dollar relative to gold, and changed the entire monetary debate for decades. The legal act that Roosevelt used at the time, the Gold Reserve Act, is still in effect.
Nobody canceled it. It has been lying there unused for 90 years, like a charged instrument waiting for someone to pick it up again. So why should anyone take on him now? Follow the math with me. Because mathematics is the whole story. The Peter G. Peterson Foundation reported that the United States will have paid nearly a trillion dollars in interest alone by 2025 .
Reuters reported that in April this year, one month of interest payments on the national debt reached a record $112 billion in a single month. This is not a rounding error in the federal budget . This is a structural crisis in slow motion. When the government reaches the point where it can no longer tax its output, can no longer borrow its output cheaply, and can no longer quietly inflate its output without the public knowing, it starts to look at what's on the other side of the ledger .
And the most blatantly undervalued asset on the entire US balance sheet by a mile is gold, which is listed at $42 an ounce, while in the real world it is trading at over $4,000. Here's a question to ponder. If you were the Secretary of the Treasury and you had a legal mechanism that had been sitting there for 90 years unused and could instantly add hundreds of billions, potentially over a trillion dollars, to your government's assets with a single accounting entry, you would be looking at a debt service bill approaching a trillion dollars a year.
Would you really leave this tool in a drawer? Now let's talk about timing, because this is where things get specific, and I want you to pay close attention to this . The real regulatory deadline is approaching, which ends on July 13. Back in January, the administration issued an official proclamation regarding processed critical minerals under Section 232 of the Trade Authorization Act.
And as part of this proclamation, were given exactly 180 days to report on the status of negotiations with trading partners. This 180- day window closes on July 13. I want to be precise because I've seen this deadline greatly inflated in other places. This is not an automatic launch of tariffs. Nothing legally obliges new tariffs to be implemented on that day.
On July 13, there is a status report, a milestone where the administration decides whether negotiations are progressing or whether it is time to escalate with new trade restrictions, including setting price caps on critical minerals that were explicitly mentioned in the original proclamation. But here's why it's important for precious metals.
Silver is on the US list of critically important minerals. If Washington decides on the 13th or later that the talks are deadlocked and starts moving towards imposing tariffs or price caps on processed critical minerals, that will be another pressure point that exacerbates the already tense physical silver market, on top of everything else we are about to discuss.
And separately in the political calendar. The midterm elections will be held in November. That's about four months from where we are now. If a president is ever going to take politically explosive monetary action, such as a gold revaluation, conventional political logic dictates that it should be done either at the very beginning of a term, when you have years to let the dust settle, or right before an election, when you desperately need a victory that will capture the public’s attention.
We've already passed early. We are approaching the second window. Some analysts who have been following this particular issue for over a year believe that the pressure of holding the House of Representatives in November is exactly what could force a decision on reassessment to move from theoretical to real within this particular window.
I'm not telling you it will happen on a specific date. No one trustworthy will tell you that. I'm telling you that the political stimulus and the balance stimulus are lining up in the same direction at the same time, and this alignment is worth your attention. Let's talk about what didn't happen, because I think that actually strengthens the argument, not weakens it.
You may remember the chatter a few weeks ago about a supposed July 4th gold reboot. Rumors surrounding gold-backed bond proposals . Some pointed to the specific name of an economist who suggested that a monetary statement would be made on America's 250th anniversary. July 4th has arrived. July 4th has passed.
Nothing happened. No ads, no reloads, no $20,000 in gold . If you bought into this particular date, you were let down. And that's why I want you to hear it from someone who is offering you a sober version, not a hype-based version. Real structural stories, those backed by actual legislation and real Federal Reserve research, do not move on artificially invented timelines .
They move under political and fiscal pressure quietly and usually without a countdown. The lack of fireworks on the 4th of July doesn't kill this story. It simply tells you that the people who hyped a certain date were guessing. The underlying pressure, the debt, the interest payments, the outdated book value of $42 – none of this led anywhere on July 5th.
Now let's base all of this on what the market is actually doing right now, because price action tells its own story. Gold is trading at around $4,120 an ounce as we speak. The price of silver is around $60. Both metals have fallen from their January highs, when the price of gold jumped above $5,500 and silver briefly touched nearly $122, the highest nominal price at which silver has ever traded in history.
Even after this jump, the price of silver actually fell by about 16% from its opening, suggesting that it was a truly volatile 12 months, not a smooth one-way rocket move. So why such a pushback? Two words, Kevin Walshe. The new Fed chairman has taken a noticeably hawkish stance, and the latest FOMC minutes showed a real split within the committee.
Some members are open to cutting rates, while others actively pushed for a rate hike before policy was finally left unchanged last month. Markets currently estimate the probability of a rate hike by September at around 60-67%. Additionally, escalating tensions between the United States and Iran around the Strait of Hormuz have sent oil prices soaring this week, and rising oil prices directly affect inflation expectations, which directly affects how hawkish the Fed needs to be.
This combination, a hawkish chair and a surge in oil prices, is exactly the kind of headwind that is weighing on gold and silver in the short term, even during a structural bull market. However, this is where it gets interesting, because even though retail sentiment has cooled and prices have adjusted, the people with the biggest checkbooks in the world are not backing down.
China's central bank just extended its streak of gold purchases to 20 consecutive months, bringing its official reserves to over 75 million ounces. 20 months, not 20 days. 20 months of consistent, disciplined accumulation by one of the largest economies on the planet, continuing even during this correction .
Central banks are not panicking, they are selling at a two- cent pullback. They accumulate it because of this. This is a signal worth listening to. Would you buy an asset that professional, patient, institutional money has continued to add to every month for almost two years straight? Because this is exactly what is happening in the official sector right now.
While retail traders have been hurt , let's talk about where the big banks think this will go next, because that's more important than any internet rumors. HSBC recently lowered its 2026 average gold price forecast to $4,560, with a 2027 target of around $4,925. Bank of America lowered its 2026 average price forecast by about 14% to $4,360, citing the more hawkish Fed stance we just discussed.
But here's what's important. Even after lowering its forecast, Bank of America said they still believe a gold price of $5,000 is achievable after this monetary policy tightening cycle is complete. Read this again . Even the fact that the bank is becoming more cautious in the short term tells you that the medium-term destination has not changed.
The differences are not in direction. It's about obstacles on the way to it. So, where is the silver then? And where is the ratio between the two metals? The gold to silver ratio is currently around 69, meaning it takes around 69 ounces of silver to buy one ounce of gold. Historically, this ratio has fluctuated somewhere between 40 and 60.
Some analysts point out that if gold eventually becomes overvalued or simply approaches the $5,000 to $10,000 range, institutions will continue to float and the ratio will return to historical norms. You can do the arithmetic yourself on what this means for silver. I'm not going to give you a specific target price for silver based on a gold revaluation that hasn't happened yet, because that would be exactly the type of untested promise I told you at the beginning I wasn't going to make.
What I will tell you is that silver's dual role as an industrial metal, essential for solar panels, electronics, and defense applications, and a monetary metal that tends to outperform gold in percentage terms during true bull phases, means that silver is usually the more volatile, more emotional trade of the two.
It corrects more strongly on the way down, and historically it is traded more strongly on the way up. This is not a forecast. This is simply what the historical picture looks like. Let's be honest about the vocal situation, because I promise you balance. And balance means giving the skeptics their due.
If Kevin Walsh's Fed turns out to be more dovish than the market currently expects, and rates remain higher for a longer period, it will be a real headwind for a non-yielding asset like gold and silver. A stronger dollar makes metals more expensive for international buyers and could limit growth regardless of what Washington does on the fiscal front.
And on the issue of revaluation, many authoritative voices point out that the official revaluation of gold itself carries serious risks. It could scare foreign holders of US debt. Internationally, this could be interpreted as a quiet devaluation of the dollar by the United States, rather than its strengthening, and it could provoke the very inflationary shock that makes an already stressed Fed even more aggressive.
There is also the simple reality that Washington has previously floated dramatic monetary ideas that have never materialized. Skepticism here is not unfounded. He is healthy. Is this growth sustainable, or is it just a story that the market front is fueling that may never happen? Honestly, that's a valid question, and I don't think anyone, including me, can answer it with certainty.
What I can tell you is this . Regardless of whether an official revaluation ever occurs, the forces driving gold and silver higher this year are: six straight years of structural silver supply deficits, 20 straight months of central bank gold accumulation, a Fed chairman who is experiencing one of the most challenging inflationary environments in years, and a debt service bill approaching a trillion dollars annually.
All of these forces exist completely regardless of whether Scottcent ever picks up the phone and announces a reassessment. A story about a reboot is a catchy title . The fundamentals of supply and demand are the actual basis for it. If you want research-based gold and silver analysis , not noise and countdown clocks that never work, make sure you subscribe because separating the real signal from the noise is exactly what we do here every week.
I sincerely want to know what you think about this . Do you believe that Washington will actually initiate an official gold revaluation before these midterm elections? Do you think it remains theoretical, discussed in official documents and buried in the text of the bill, but never actually signed? Tell me in the comments.
I read every one of them. And some of the harshest negative feedback I receive on this channel comes directly from you. That's what I want you to get today. The figure of $42 on the Fed's books is no longer just an accounting whim. It becomes a real object of political and fiscal pressure, and the legal instrument for its change has remained intact since 1934.
July 13 brings a real trading deadline that could add new pressure to an already tense silver market. And November brings a political calendar that gives Washington a real incentive to act boldly, if it ever happens at all. None of this guarantees that the reboot will happen on any specific date. But it explains why this conversation doesn't go away and why the smart money continues to position itself in gold and silver while the loudest voices on the internet argue about made-up deadlines that never work.
If you found this helpful, please give it a like so more people can see honest analysis, not another countdown. And share this with everyone in your circle who has been asking you if any of this reboot talk is actually real. See you in the next issue, where we'll take a detailed look at exactly what's going on inside the Federal Reserve's gold certificate account at the moment the revaluation actually kicks in, and why almost no one understands the mechanics of how that number actually moves.
Comments 0