์ ์: ChamathPalihapitiya ยท ์ธ๊ตญ์ธ
์์ฝ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๊ฒฐ๋ก : ๋ค๊ฐ์ค๋ 3~5๊ฐ์๊ฐ CPI ๊ธ๋ฑ์ด ์์๋๋ฉฐ, ์ฐ์ค์ ๊ณผ์ ๊ธด์ถ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ ์ค์ ํํฅ์ผ๋ก ์ฃผ์์์ฅ ์ ๋ฐ์ด ํ๋ฝํ ๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ์ด ํฌ๋ค๋ ๋น๊ด์ ์ ๋ง์ด๋ค. ์ธํ๋ ์ด์ ์ ๋ง: ์๋๋ฃ(3๊ฐ์ ์์ฐจ)์ ์์ ์ํ์ฐ์๋๋ฃ ์ฌ๋ฐ์์ผ๋ก CPI๊ฐ ๊ณ์ ์ค๋ฅผ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ์์ํ๋ฉฐ, ํ์ฌ CPI 8~9% ์์ค์ด ์ด์ด์ง ์ ์๋ค๊ณ ๋ดค๋ค. ์ ๊ฐ๋ ๋ฐฐ๋ด๋น 105๋ฌ๋ฌ ์์ค์ด๊ณ ๋ฌ์์์ ์ ๋ฝ ๊ฐ์ค ๊ณต๊ธ ์ฐจ์ง์ด ๋ฆฌ๋จผ๊ธ ์ ์ผ ์ฐ๋ ค๋ฅผ ๋ณ๊ณ ์๋ค๊ณ ์ธ๊ธํ๋ค. ์ฐ์ค ๋ฐ ๋ถ์ฑ: ์ฐ์ค์ด ์ ๋ขฐ๋ฅผ ์์ง ์์ผ๋ ค๋ฉด ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ๊ณผ๋ํ๊ฒ ๊ธด์ถ(๊ณผ์ ๊ต์ )ํ ์๋ฐ์ ์๊ณ , ์ด๋ ์ฃผ์ ํ๋ฝ์ผ๋ก ์ด์ด์ง๋ค๊ณ ๋ดค๋ค. ์ฌ๋ชจํ๋ LBO ๋ถ์ฑ ๋ฑ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ์ ์ฒด์ ๊ณผ๋ํ ๋ ๋ฒ๋ฆฌ์ง๋ ์ ์ฉ์์ฅ ์ ์ผ ์ํ์ผ๋ก ์ง๋ชฉํ๋ค. ํ์ด์ค๋ถ(๋ฉํ) ์ฌ๋ก: ์์ฅ ์์น์ผ์ ๋ฉํ๋ ์ฝ 4% ํ๋ฝํ๋๋ฐ, ๋๋ํ ๊ธฐ๊ด ์๊ธ์ด ์ค์ ํํฅ์ ๋ฐ์ํด ๋งค๋ํ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ํด์ํ๋ค. ์๊ฐ์ ์ฌํด ๊ธฐ๋ก์ ์ค์ ๋ฐ ๋ด๋ ์ฆ๊ฐ ์ ๋ง์ ํ๋ ธ๊ณ , ์ค์ ์ด ํํฅ ์กฐ์ ๋ ๊ฒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ ์ฃผ์ฅํ๋ค. ์ด์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ์ ์ฒด ์ฃผ์์ด ๋ฎ์ ๊ฐ๊ฒฉ์ผ๋ก ์ฌํ๊ฐ๋ ๊ฒ์ด๋ฉฐ, ํ๊ธ ์๊ฐํ๋ ๋น์์ต ๊ธฐ์ ์ฃผ์ ํนํ ํฐ ์๋ ฅ์ด ๊ฐํด์ง ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ดค๋ค. ์ ๋์ฑ ๋ฐ M2: ์ฃผ์์์ฅ ์์น์ M2 ํตํ๋ ์ฆ๊ฐ์ 0.92 ์๊ด๊ด๊ณ์์ผ๋ฏ๋ก, ์ฐ์ค์ 3~5์กฐ ๋ฌ๋ฌ ์ ๋์ฑ ํ์๋ ์ฃผ์ ์์ฅ ๊ฐ์น๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์ ๊ท๋ชจ๋ก ๋ฎ์ถ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ดค๋ค. ์ด์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ํ๊ธ ๋ณด์ ๋ฅผ ์ ์งํด์ผ ํ๋ฉฐ ์ง๊ธ ์ ๋์ฑ์ ํฌ๊ธฐํ์ง ์๊ฒ ๋ค๊ณ ๋ฐํ๋ค. ์ง์ ํ ๋ฐ ์ ์ฌ: ์ฐํฌ๋ผ์ด๋-๋ฌ์์ ์ ์๊ณผ ๋๋ฌ ์ ์ฌ๊ฐ ์คํจํด ๋ฌ์์ ๊ฒฝ์์์ง ํ์๊ฐ ๋์๊ณ , ์ ์ฌ ์ฐํ๋ก ๋ฌ์์ ๊ฒฝ์ ๋ ๋ฒ์ฑํ๊ณ ์๋ค๊ณ ๋นํํ๋ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ ์ ๋ฝ ์ค์ฌ ํ์์ ํตํ ํด์ ์ด ์์๋๋ฉฐ, ๋ฌ๋ฌ ๊ธฐ์ถํตํ ์ง์ ํผ์(์์ํ ๊ฒฐ์ ํ๋) ์ฐ๋ ค๋ฅผ ์ ๊ธฐํ๋ค. ์ถ์ฐ์ ์ ๋ง: ๋จ๊ธฐ์ ์ผ๋ก ์ฃผ์ ์ ๋ฐ ํ๋ฝ, ํนํ ๋น์์ต ์ฑ์ฅ์ฃผ์ ์ทจ์ฝํ๋ค๋ ์ ์ฅ์ด๋ฉฐ ํ๊ธ ๋น์ค ํ๋๋ฅผ ์์ฌํ๋ค.
๋ค๋ฌ์ ๊ธ
I think you need to buckle your seat belt because the next three four five months of CPI will probably be very very bad seven eight nine percent why there are a handful of components that have gotten completely run away number one the biggest one is rent and so rent works on a three month lag we're gonna reintroduce what the true owners equivalent rent is into CPI so we can already forecast that CPI going up oil is at 105 bucks a barrel Russia is basically trying to break the back of Europe by now messing with their Nat gas supplies the German energy Minister yesterday said that if that happens it could be a contagion equivalent to Lehman Brothers with respect to energy when you play all of these things out what you have is unfortunately rampant runaway costs that really have no mechanism to get back and check in the absence of some real governmental changes our policy on this Ukraine Russia War you know how we intend to sort of work or cooperate or fight with China all of these things have to get solved so in the absence of that prices are going to continue to go up and so what does the FED do how does it throw away what little credibility it has left when there's eight and nine percent inflation prints and saying we think we're done for right now you can't do that so they will over correct because there is just going to be so much pressure for them to act all roads I think lead to lower Equity prices but now it has to touch all these other areas for example we have gotten totally drunk on debt as a country one of the most obvious places where we've been serving alcohol far too late into the night isn't the financing of all these private Equity leverage buyouts these are sketchy companies that are sort of like teetering on insolvency at times where private Equity comes in levers up the balance sheet with debt they price it right to the edge of what's legally allowed or what's financiable and then they go do it but that's all assuming the economy continues to grow and so if all of a sudden you have some recessionary forces or prices go up and earnings don't you'll have a contagion in the debt markets you could have a contagion in the commodity market so we're dealing with some really tough boundary conditions I do think that we can know these things without sampling in such a porous way and now you know we're going to look we've had a system of over correcting and undercorrecting for years the problem is the stakes get higher and higher as the economy grows and becomes more complicated and we have more leverage I also want to tell you guys a quick Story one of the most interesting canaries in the coal mine of all of this was two days ago and what happened to Facebook and this sort of ties a lot of this stuff together in terms of economics inflation asset prices equities everybody was saying gosh the Market's going to rip on the open you know we were closed for Juneteenth and then on Tuesday the market you know the s p was up like 250 basis points 2.5 and the NASDAQ was also a polit maybe 300 basis points roughly but Facebook was down like 400 votes right so it's a big spread and why is that and I was like this makes no sense to me what is going on with this price action everything was up Apple was up Google was up and so I called around and you know I was like why is this happening and this is the best explanation I got when you look at who the incremental buyer is in the stock market it tends to give you a sense of whether prices can go up or will continue to go down and the forest informed buyer tends to be retail and the most informed buyer tends to be these very large institutional hedge funds right so there's a spectrum Facebook is an example a big tack that is poorly owned by retail so it's mostly owned by smart money and the case that smart money makes for owning Facebook is that it's got an extremely cheap price to earnings ratio so you must own it it's not that the price to earnings was cheap it's at the e in p e was just wrong and if they pass through all of these increases in inflation and you know their earnings expectations into Facebook it's actually more like fair value at a lower price that's why they sold it so much on a day where the market was on now why is that important well eventually you're going to touch all these other stocks as well that are going to go through earnings revisions in this recession this is where I think Wall Street has done a very poor job on behalf of retail if you look at the estimates of earnings you will be shocked to hear that Wall Street actually has this year being record earnings next year earnings continuing to go up how is that possible how do you see earnings continue to go up into these prints like this when you cannot pass through 80 90 increases in energy and cogs and whatnot you have to sell fewer things because there'll be fewer people with jobs to buy things I think wall Street's wrong and I think that earnings are going to go down this year and will definitely go down in 23 and so I think what probably happens is the entire world of equities needs to get repriced at a lower price and in that it's going to put enormous pressure on these cash burning non-profitable tech companies part of the government acknowledges that you have to really ring fence and protect consumers if you look at the Securities laws they're meant to protect them at all costs but the reason is because sometimes you want people to make good decisions and if you give them a bunch of Firepower they're just going to spend it they acted rationally they spent it now we have to take it all back I don't think that's going to be as easy or as simple as people think it's stunning that you know the reason the stock market went up dollar for dollar was actually tied to the growth in the M2 money supply the correlation was 0.92 so for every dollar that the FED printed the stock market went up by 92 cents so it stands to reason that if the FED is going to take three to five trillion dollars of value out then we have to rewrite the equity markets by three to five trillion dollars at a minimum and then you have to rewrite and re-baseline for earnings and so that's probably another 20 or 30.
you're assuming that all of a sudden like demand is stable but it's not necessarily stable in a demand contraction yes people get fired but then also new job openings change there's fewer of them they're more specific again we're at the beginning of the beginning for all of us that lived through 2000 this was four years of sheer health and a grind now we have 30 trillion dollars that we have to work through the economy a recession we have to overcome a war we need to end and people all of a sudden assume that two or three rate hikes and five or six months of headlines are enough and on the margin maybe they're right but from my perspective you know it's an observation that we're at the beginning of something that just fundamentally has to take some amount of time to work its way through the system and so I don't understand why anyone buddy would give up their liquidity in this moment right now why would you why would I give up 100 million dollars of cash in my bank account I would not do that right now the people in Russia are suffering during this the people in the Ukraine are being murdered I mean how does it end the problem is that Biden engaged the United States in a proxy war without our real explicit discussion number one and then number two is then we pulled and we pressured Europe to really draw a hard line but the now are kind of working around it so that the countries that suffer the most are Europe now I think you starting to see the tea leaves though last week there was a group of European leaders I think it was macron draghi and one other person who went to Ukraine we need to find an organized de taunt here because there is according to Europe a lehman-like situation in terms of economic contagion that could manifest over the next months so I think that the end game is probably some organized negotiated detaunt and ceasefire I don't think anybody will be happy with it but I think by and large Russia is and has one you know meaning they've won economically they're selling oil like it's not going out of style it's just not selling it to Europe and to America you know they're selling it to China they're selling it in Africa they're selling it we engage in economic sanctions and I was the first one to say hey this could really work and this could be a road map for how to do it and it turned out this is the road map for how not to do it you can't on the front door say here are these sanctions and then walk around the back door and basically open the door for them these sanctions were so porous as to be like swiss cheese we focused on virtue signaling acts confiscating a plane or a boat or a house but we didn't focus on the structural things we needed to actually make the Mandate that we believe to be just to come to life and so Russia's completely worked around it their economy effectively is thriving so what have we gained because the exact opposite of what we tried to do Russia's current account Surplus more than tripled in the the first four months of the year prices surge oil and gas Imports and imports plunged under the weight of sanctions well you know if you're Putin and you're looking at this you're like wow maybe I should be under sanctions more often you know what country should I invade next so not only did our sanctions package not work and not only is the treasury flailing around now trying to find even more back doors which is now we allowed oil to settle in currencies that are not just the United States dollar and now Russia and China are trading and settling in CNY that's not good for us this is not how you preserve the reserve currency of America if you have a country that has existed in some way shape or form you know the borders could be blurry but roughly for hundreds and hundreds of years and in some cases thousands of years where internally the population of that country views themselves you know in a great way they don't feel like their country is a meaningless nothing country any attempt to economically humiliate such a country tends to have failed in the past and will continue to fill and there tends to be other countries who view it as one of these things where well if them then why not us and then they sort of in a backhanded way support everybody so we end up in this odd situation where we are picking fights we cannotwit and the consequences for us are economically really damaging and then the consequences for everybody else to stay on the sidelines is like economic prosperity



Comments 0