원문 보기
It's July 9, 2026. The most watched tech investor in the United States opens her funds and buys Meta. Meta, the company behind Facebook and Instagram, is an advertising machine. She acquires $22.8 million worth of stock in a single day . 11 days later, he does it again and buys another $18 million worth of Meta.
Over the past 5 years, their main fund lost money. The annualized return has decreased by 8.42% per year. During that same period, the lackluster S&P 500 yielded an annual return of 11.63% . These are the 500 largest companies in the United States, and you can buy everything with just one click. And here's the craziest part.
She had previously cut her position in Meta in half. So imagine you copied every single one of their moves for the past 5 years. You'd be in the red. And your friend who bought the S&P 500 and just relaxed, outperformed it by a long shot. Before we delve deeper, why should you listen to me? My name is Ken Freeman.
I am a CFA charterholder, a professor at Rutgers Business School, and I train analysts on Wall Street for major banks such as JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and BlackRock. By the end of this, you'll know what she bought, why the timing is so strange, and whether you should follow her or not. So, did Kathy Wood nail the next big deal, or is she just going around in circles?
If you were to create the perfect visionary investor, what would she look like ? She sees the future before the crowd. Bet early, when it still seems crazy. And she doesn't blink when everyone says she's wrong. And once a decade, she makes such a big bet that it makes her famous. Guess what? That's exactly who Kathy Wood is.
She runs a firm called ARK Invest. He launched ARK in 2014. His full proposition: bet on the future, forget the past. ARK seeks only one thing: disruption. Disruption means new technology that ends the old way of doing things. Robots, gene editing, crypto, the future. Its main fund is traded under the symbol ARKK.
A fund is simply a basket that contains many shares. From 2014 to 2020, their fund was a complete success. It had an average annual return of 45%. Then came 2020 and it yielded 153%. She invested in Tesla early on, and in Bitcoin as well. Zoom, Roku, Coinbase, his name was everywhere. So the money started pouring in.
Soon he was handling tens of billions of dollars. Money from other people that they gladly gave him to invest. She was on every screen, in every podcast; she was the most followed active manager. " Active" simply means that it chooses stocks, not that it passively follows an index . And this is where your brain does something that costs people a lot of money .
She was right for a time, in a very public way. So, your brain decides that she must know something that you don't know. This is how ordinary people silently lose out over the years. If you want to stop copying and start deciding, scan the QR code on the screen. That's where I show you how I actually do it.
Now, every hero's journey needs an enemy. His was what he had bet against for years. The boring index, the same old giant tech companies. An index simply tracks a complete list of stocks. Basically, the market. No manager, no geniuses, just the list. Apple, Microsoft, the ones she avoided. And in 2020, those giants seemed finished.
Kathy was on a roll and they seemed slow and old. This is what she rejected about those giants. They generate real profits, real money every quarter. Their actions mostly burned cash under a promise. Then came 2021, the music stopped, and the fund went into the red. And in 2022, it came to a screeching halt.
The ARK fund plummeted by almost 67%. If you invested $10,000, you were only left with about $ 3,300. The money that followed ran towards the exit just as fast. Meanwhile, Apple and Microsoft simply continued to capitalize on their profits. Building capital means making a profit on your own profits.
So, let's fast-forward five years. His fund lost 8.42% year-on-year and the lackluster S&P 500 gained 11.63% year-on-year. A list without a manager surpassed the visionary one by 5 years. Yes it's true. Let that sink in for a moment. But don't rule it out yet. Look at 2025. She came back strong, rising more than 35% and outperforming the index by almost double.
So this is where it gets weird. He is now accumulating shares of Meta. So what does she see that others seem to overlook? The goal is not the action with which he built his fame. It is one of the largest companies on the planet. Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp . So why is the disruption expert buying it?
Before you judge her, you need to know why we can see her operations. Most large investors only show their hand four times a year. They submit a report and everyone waits 90 days to see it. That form is called declaration 13F. ARK doesn't do that. ARC publishes each and every one of its transactions daily .
Buy the same stock in three funds at the same time. So you need to add all three together to decide if it's a big operation. Add them up and here's the real picture. July 9, 34.80 shares, $22.8 million . July 20, another 28.16 shares, 18 million more. And that same day, he got rid of 25 million on Spotify.
He sold a high- growth stock to buy an old giant. Now, this is the part that almost no one noticed. He bought Meta after it had already risen 14.8% in one week . Why the jump? Meta found a new way to make money. It plans to lease surplus AI computing capacity . It's called MetaMP computing, a Neo cloud.
But she has held the Meta for years and, earlier this year, cut her position in half. He sold when the market was down and calm. And now he's buying back when it's already gone up. That's why this operation is a little strange. And even after both acquisitions, Meta isn't even in their top 10. It's still just a small part, but that part is growing.
So, is she seeing something early again? Or is she just chasing after something that's already started? To answer that, we need to review your records. Three big predictions. One that was right, one that was wrong, and one that is still ongoing. The first one, Tesla, the one that made her famous. February 7, 2018, it airs live on television.
I love Tesla. It is one of our largest holdings, the largest in our general fund. We believe that if Elon Musk and SpaceX can do what they did yesterday in space, right? They will be able to produce the Model 3. At that time, Tesla was worth about 56 billion. The most optimistic analyst on Wall Street had a target of $500.
That target price is an estimate of the future value. Kathy looks directly at the camera and says 4,000. That's right, 4,000. And people laughed at her on live television. And honestly, it's understandable why: Tesla was losing money and Wall Street thought the company might go bankrupt, myself included.
Then, in 2020, Tesla performed a 5-for-1 stock split. A stock split simply divides each share into smaller parts . The same pizza, more slices. So his goal of 4,000 became 800. Three years after his forecast, Tesla easily surpassed that number. The outlandish prediction came true. And that single gamble earned him a decade of trust.
He earned it through hard work. But what made her right with Tesla is what knocked her out with the next one. Choose Nvidia. This one hurts. Nvidia is the chip company behind the entire AI boom. And ARK first bought it back in 2014. In November 2022, ChatGPT was launched and the whole world saw what AI could do.
And then, in early January 2023, he sells Nvidia. His entire position. Five weeks after the starting gun. He had a front-row seat and just walked away. In just a few months, Nvidia doubled its value. Money I would have earned without doing absolutely anything. And in May 2023, he reaffirmed his decision to be out.
In his words, the price was ahead of the curve. Nvidia's market capitalization was one trillion dollars at the time. Market capitalization is the total value of the company and it continued to rise for years. He finally bought again in April 2025. So the disruption fund missed the biggest disruption of our lifetime.
Early and right with Tesla, early and totally wrong with Nvidia. Now , the third bet, and this one is still open. Bet three, Bitcoin. For years, his bullish forecast was $1.5 million per Bitcoin by 2030. Then, on November 6, 2025, he lowered his forecast to $1.2 million, but it's still crazy. Their reason: stable currencies.
A stablecoin is a cryptocurrency pegged to the US dollar. She believes they are taking some of Bitcoin's work away from it. That bet is still alive, even though it hasn't been tested yet. Now look at the pattern in all three. A huge figure, announced early and forcefully. Sometimes she's Tesla and she seems like a genius.
Sometimes it's Nvidia and it costs a fortune . There's almost no middle ground with Cathie Wood. Even their victories are stretched too far. She predicted that Tesla would be worth $3 trillion by 2025. It never reached that figure. So look at what you just saw. One of the greatest living investors has a big win, a serious failure, and an untested bet.
And those who copied it never knew what they were copying until it was too late. So , if you're tired of finding out after the fact, scan the QR code on the screen. Okay, let's get back to the question. Which version of Cathie Wood is Meta buying right now ? The Tesla genius or the Nvidia flop? The most watched investor spent years betting against the giants, and the giants won.
A simple index surpassed it for 5 years. And now he turns around and buys one of those giants. Meta, an action she had previously halved. And he bought it again right after it rose 14.8% in just one week. And his track record with predictions is like flipping a coin . A genius with Tesla, totally wrong about Nvidia, and still unproven with Bitcoin.
When everything turned against her, she said so herself. At the beginning of 2021, we couldn't do any wrong. Everyone wanted to talk to us. Today, according to the media, we can't do anything right. And she still hasn't backed down an inch. So , what does all this mean for you? Copying their trade on Meta today is just guesswork.
So, this is what you should watch out for instead. Will he continue buying Meta from here and make it one of his top 10 investments? If he does it, he's serious and the operation is real. If the purchases stop here, perhaps it was just a one-off operation. And that's the tool I want you to keep. It works with Kathy.
It works with Buffett. It works with all major investors. Every time a big name in the industry buys something, they ask one thing. Is this something they'll keep nurturing until it's enormous? Or is it just a test to see what happens, one they could abandon tomorrow? Ask that question and you'll stop guessing.
Now, that bet on Meta, to which it continues to add, depends on the biggest bet in all of technology. Meta plans to spend up to $145 billion on AI capital expenditures by 2026. Is it the smartest bet of the decade or a bottomless pit? Last Friday, I did a full assessment of Meta so you could see if Kathy is ahead of schedule, behind schedule, or totally wrong.
Now, I want to hear from you. Do you follow the big investors or ignore them? If you copy someone, who is it and why? Let me know in the comments below. As always, be ruthless.
Comments 0