people장 홈📈 Stock Masters주식 유튜브를 Articles로 읽고 Author의 예측을 실제 가격으로 확인합니다 people장 Board 홈요청하기

한국어 · English

The History of Warren Buffett

Finance Zoom · 2026-10-26 · 유튜브 시청 6 · Board Views 14 · International

International

유튜브 썸네일

원문 보기

다듬은 글 보기

A $1,000 investment in Warren Buffett in 1965 is worth over $55 million today. But here's what almost nobody talks about. The strategy that made him his first million is not the strategy that made him a billionaire. In fact, if Buffett still invested today the way he invested in his 20s, Berkshire Hathaway wouldn't exist.

So, in this video, I'm going to walk you through the entire evolution of Warren Buffett's investment strategy. From the cigar butts he picked up off the street to the quality businesses that built an empire to the final playbook he handed off in 2026. And at the end, I'll give you the five lessons you can actually use regardless of how much money you're starting with.

Let's get into it. Buffett's strategy didn't start in a boardroom. It started with his mentor, a professor at Colombia named Benjamin Graham, who had a very specific philosophy after watching the market destroy people in 1929. Graham's idea was simple. Find companies so beaten down, so unloved that you could buy them for less than the cash and assets sitting on their books.

He called the cigar butt approach. Interesting, right? Yeah. Find a soggy, discarded cigar lying on the ground that still has one good puff left in it. It's free. It's not glamorous, but it works. Buffett took this literally. He found a company called Dempster Mill, a windmill manufacturer in a town of less than 10,000 people, trading at $18 a share against a book value of $72.

That gap is almost unheard of today. But back then, the market was inefficient enough that bargains like this were sitting in plain sight if you were willing to dig. But here's the part people leave out. Buffett wasn't just a numbers guy sitting behind a desk. He and his team literally drove to small farms in Nebraska, knocking on doors, buying shares of an obscure insurance company called National American from farmers who didn't even know their stock was worth anything.

Sometimes buying at a 70% discount to fair value. This bargain hunting strategy generated Buffett roughly 100% annual returns in the first five years of his partnership. But it had a flaw and that flaw is going to show up in the next part of the story. Cigarb butt investing works great with a small amount of money.

It does not work when your fund is managing tens of millions of dollars because there just aren't enough cheap broken companies to buy in size. Buffett found this out the hard way with Berkshire Hathaway itself. It wasn't a visionary bet. It was a leftover textile mill he bought because the numbers looked statistically cheap.

When the owner tried to short change him on a stock buyback deal, Buffett got angry, bought enough shares to take control out of spite, and ended up owning a dying textile company with no future. He later said it himself. Berkshire Hathaway looked like a cheap stock, but it was a terrible business. That is the single most important lesson buried inside this entire story and I'll circle back to it at the end.

This is also exactly when Charlie Munger enters the picture. Munger looked at Buffett's whole approach and basically said, "Stop buying garbage because it's cheap. Buy wonderful businesses even if you have to pay a fair price for them." That one idea is the hinge point of this entire documentary. The moment Buffett's strategy splits into two completely different eras, the first real test of this new philosophy was a candy company in Los Angeles called Seize Candies.

It wasn't statistically cheap. It wasn't a cigar butt, but it had something Graham's method never looked for, a moat. Customers would pay more for Se's candy year after year, decade after decade, simply because of the brand. Buffett and Munger bought it and it went on to generate billions in profit over the following decades off a relatively small purchase price.

Around the same time, they discovered something even more powerful than the candy business itself. Float companies like blue chip stamps and later insurance companies held on to massive piles of customer cash before they had to pay it out. Buffett realized he could invest that idle cash in other businesses, essentially using other people's money for free to keep compounding.

This is the engine that scales his entire strategy from here forward. It's not just buy good companies. It's buy good companies using floats you don't have to pay interest on. From here, the floodgates open. Newspapers, banks, insurance. Buffett keeps stacking cash generating businesses on top of each other, using the float from each one to fund the next acquisition.

By the mid1 1980s, Buffett's strategy evolved again. He's no longer just hunting for undervalued assets or even cheap quality businesses. He's building a brand of his own. And that brand becomes an asset in itself. When Solomon Brothers gets caught manipulating a treasury bond auction and nearly collapses, the company doesn't call a lawyer first.

They call Buffett. Why? Because at this point, Warren Buffett is invested functions almost like a government guarantee. His name alone could calm markets. He uses this leverage to negotiate deals nobody else could get. guaranteed returns on preferred stock in Solomon, Gillette, Goldman Sachs during the 2008 crisis and General Electric.

In every one of these, Buffett isn't just investing capital. He's renting out decades of trust for guaranteed asymmetric upside. That's a strategy small investors genuinely cannot copy. But it's important to understand it because it explains almost everything Bergkshire does from the 1990s onward. And this strategy reached its peak during the 2008 financial crisis.

While the rest of the market panics, Buffett is doing some of his best deals ever because his reputation and cash pile let him dictate terms nobody else could get. Here's where it gets interesting for anyone trying to apply this today. In 2016, Buffett, the man famous for avoiding tech, bought a massive stake in Apple.

Not because it's a tech company, but because he reclassifies it in his head as a consumer products company with a brand moat, exactly like Se's Candies, just at a trillion dollar scale. Then, starting around 2022, Bergkshire starts selling more than it buys for 14 straight quarters, stacking up a cash pile of over $380 billion.

Everyone reads this as a market call. Buffett thinks stocks are too expensive, but that's not quite the full picture. He was preparing a handoff. In 2026, Buffett named Greg Ael as CEO, stepping back after 60 years. And almost immediately, Berkshire breaks that 14 quarter selling streak and starts buying again, adding to Alphabet, buying Taylor Morrison outright, increasing stakes in Delta and Homebuilders.

The strategy didn't end. It got handed to someone else to keep running. So, here's what I actually took away from going through all 60 years of this one. The strategy has to match your size. Cigarb butt investing worked when Buffett had a few hundred,000. It's actually a huge advantage for smaller investors today because you can still find small overlooked bargains that a trillion dollar fund can't touch.

Two, cheap and good are not the same thing. Bergkshire Hathaway itself was Buffett's proof that buying cheap without buying good can trap you in a dying business for decades. Three float and cash flow are a force multiplier. It's not just what you buy, it's what you use to fund the buying. Reinvesting cash flow back into more cash generating assets is the actual engine behind the compounding.

Four, reputation becomes its own asset class. It took Buffett 40 years to build the kind of trust that let him dictate deal terms during a financial crisis. You won't get there overnight, but every honest decision compounds the same way money does. Five, the best investors plan their own exit. Buffett didn't wait until he had no choice.

He built the cash reserve and picked the successor years in advance, so the system kept compounding without him. Now that you've seen how Buffett's strategy actually evolved over six decades, the real question is which era of that strategy fits where you are right now. Because most people are trying to copy Bergkshire's 2024 playbook with a 1965 bank account, and that mismatch is costing them money.

I'm going to break down exactly how to apply the early Buffett strategy, the cigar butt small account version, in my next video. If you enjoyed this video, kindly give it a thumbs up and consider subscribing if you haven't done so already. Thank you and see you in the next one.

#현금#골드만삭스

← List으로
공유페이스북밴드

이 Articles에 대해 요청(숨김) 수정 요청

Comments 0