원문 보기
Warren Buffett vs Rakesh Jhunjhunwala: Two different operating systems for making money. If you think of Warren Buffett and Rakesh Jhunjhunwala as just two big investors, then you are probably missing the most interesting part of their story. Because the real question is not how much money Buffett made or which stock Jhunjhunwala bought?
The real question is. What went through their minds when both of them were sitting in front of the market ? On one side was Warren Buffett of Omaha and on the other side was Rakesh Jhunjhunuwala of Mumbai. Both worked in different countries. We saw different market cycles, chose different businesses and our approach to investing was not exactly the same.
But there is a very interesting connection in the story of these two. Both were not trying to withdraw money from the market. Both were trying to understand the market and survive for a longer period and this is where the real story begins. One, imagine stocks were a business for Buffett. You put a stock in front of Buffett and say, Sir, this stock has gone up 40% in the last 6 months.
Perhaps this information will not be the most important information for them. They might ask how business is. How does the company make money? Does he have a competitive advantage or not? Can the management be trusted or not? And most importantly, if the stock market closes for the next 5 years, would I still want to own this business?
This thinking explains the core idea of Buffett's philosophy. In earlier shareholder letters of Bakshar Hathaway, Buffett emphasized long-term economic value, cash-generating businesses, and above-average returns on capital. Later he clearly wrote that he views publicly traded stocks as part of businesses.
Not just as buying and selling instruments. Meaning, for Buffett, market price was often the result. The quality of the business was the reason. Two. But Jhunjhunwala's story is a little different, now let's go to Mumbai. Rakesh Jhunjhunwala did not look at the market in just one direction. He himself was a trader and also a long term investor.
And the most interesting thing is that he considered both of them as different activities. In an interview, he had said that short term trading, delivery based positions and long term investments were separate compartments for him. According to him, trading and investing require different skills and different thought processes.
That means his approach was something like this. The market is not just a place where you buy a stock and forget about it. There may be different opportunities in the market. Some may be short term. Some are medium term and some may have to be held for several years. This difference is huge. Three Buffetts used to ask where will this business go?
Jhunjhunwala used to ask. Where can this business and India's growth go together? This was an interesting angle of his. Jhunjhunwala remained quite bullish on the long-term growth story of the Indian economy. He looked at India based on factors like demographics, entrepreneurship, consumption and economic development.
So looking at a company didn't just mean looking at a company. Sometimes the big question was, if India's economy changes in the next 10 to 15 years, then which businesses can benefit from that change? And this is where a different investing mindset arises. Perfect looked very deeply at the economics of business.
Jhunjhunwala was known for aggressively looking at growth opportunities along with business. The four biggest differences in weight mean that now think of a very interesting situation. You bought a stock. The stock fell 20%. What would you do? Sell the first reaction. Second, let's wait a little. Let's buy the third one.
But the real question behind these three reactions is the same. Why did you buy the stock? If you bought just because the price was rising, your confidence will also fall as soon as the price falls. But if you had bought the business after understanding it, then falling prices and business going bad can be two different things.
Understanding the difference between business value and market quotations has been crucial to Buffett's philosophy. The role of conviction and long term holding is also visible in Jhunjhunwala's investing. His profile at Flame University also links early identification, conviction and long-term holding to his investment approach.
But there is an important point here. Conviction does not mean blind attachment. Holding on to a stock just because I bought it. Not investing. The real skill is understanding whether your original thesis still holds true. Five Buffett's power to make boring things interesting. Buffett's investing can sometimes seem boring from the outside looking in.
Why? Because something new happens in the market every day. New news, new company, new technology, new story. But Buffett Style Thinking asks, do I need to do something new every day? Probably not. If you have a good business and its economics are strong then it is not necessary to change the portfolio every week.
Here comes an uncomfortable truth about investing. Activity and progress are not the same thing. You can watch the markets all day and still not make any meaningful progress in wealth creation. On the other hand, an investor may make fewer transactions but hold the right positions for a long time. That means being busy in the market and being productive in the market are two different things.
Six Jhunjhunwala Strengths, Recognizing Opportunity. Now look at the style of Jhunjhunwala on the other side. He wasn't just limited to finding a good company. Their philosophy includes factors such as opportunity, competitive advantage, scalability, management, valuation, and the Mac environment. This means that it is not enough for a company to be good.
There is another question. Is the market pricing this opportunity correctly right now ? This is where the valuation comes from. Because a great company isn't always a great investment. If you pay so high a price for a great business that future returns become very low, then even if the business is good, the outcome of the investment may be different and this is the distinction that new investors often miss.
By now you may have noticed a surprising similarity between the two. Buffet is different, rattle one is different. But at one place the thinking of both surprisingly matches. He did not take decisions just by looking at the price. On one hand, business quality, on the other, opportunity and growth. But for both, the stock wasn't just a number flashing on a screen.
There was a real business behind it. There were people, there was management, there was cash flow, there was competition and most importantly there was the future. That means the biggest question in the market is probably not what is the price today? Rather, what could be the future economics of the thing I am buying today ?
Eight. And this is where a big mistake comes into play. Today a strange version of investing is seen on social media. Some say, this stock will become a multibagger. Someone says this investor has bought it, you should also buy it. Some show portfolios , some show screenshots. And then thousands of people start copying the same thing without context.
But one important thing related to Jhunjhunwala's thinking was that it is difficult to make money by copying someone else's knowledge. A published account describes his approach as one in which investors should understand another person's thought process rather than copying their knowledge. That means it is easy to copy the portfolio.
Thinking is hard to copy. And perhaps this is the reason why buying the stock of a legendary investor does not make you a legendary investor. Nine Buffett vs Jhunjhunwala. Where was the real difference? Understand this in one line. Buffett made ownership the language of investing and Jhunjhunwala combined opportunity with conviction and market experience.
On one hand, I want to own a part of this business. On the other hand, I want to understand the economics and growth of this opportunity. The two paths may look different. But one thing common in both is time. The story of investing is incomplete without time. 10 Now the most interesting question, if both of them saw a beginner today, they probably wouldn't ask this first.
Which stock did you buy? Rather the question would have been something else. Do you even know why you bought it? Because if the answer is there then friend told it. Saw it on Telegram. Heard it in a YouTube video. Bought by a big investor. So you don't have an investment thesis. You only have Borrowed Conviction.
And the biggest problem with Borrowed Conviction is that when the stock falls, Conviction is the first one to run away. 11 A small experiment Suppose you have ₹1 lakh. You have two choices. First, you see the market every day. React to every news. Sell on every dip. Buy new stock on every rise. Second, you choose fewer companies.
Understand their business. Let's look at the management. Understand valuation. Write down your investment thesis and then see if there are any fundamental changes to your thesis, rather than watching the price every day. Now pay attention. The other way is not as glamorous. Its screenshot on Instagram will become exciting.
But the real game of investing is not about excitement. The decision is of quality. 12 A Lesson from Buffett Simplicity is a powerful element of Buffett's philosophy. Simplicity. If you are unable to understand a business then there is no need to invest just because other people are doing it. You do n't have to grab every opportunity.
The market will be open tomorrow as well and perhaps the most underrated financial skill is to say no. Not every opportunity is your opportunity. Not every rising stock is your stock. It is not necessary to invest money in every bull market. And it is also necessary to panic at every fall.
Comments 0