저자: 미상 · 외국인
요약 보기
제이미 다이먼(JP모건 CEO)은 비트코인을 비판해 왔지만 JP모건이 현물 비트코인 ETF의 승인 파트너로 참여해 수혜를 보고 있다는 주장. 래리 핑크(블랙록)는 과거 회의론을 접고 비트코인을 합법적 금융상품으로 인정. 미국은 스테이블코인에 AML 기준을 적용하고 달러·국채 담보 규제를 도입해 국채 수요를 만들려 함. 트럼프는 미국이 크립토·비트코인에서 우위를 유지한다고 발언. 텍사스 주의회가 비트코인 전략준비금 법안(SB21)을 101대42로 통과, 주지사 서명이 유력하다고 봄. 발언자는 비트코인을 긍정적으로 보며 광고성 멘션(21 Bitcoin 앱)을 포함.
다듬은 글
Crypto czar David Sex, the White House's crypto czar, has now tried to convince JP Morgan CEO Jamie Diamond of Bitcoin. And Jamie Diamond, for those who don't know, is the CEO of JP Morgan and an extreme Bitcoin enemy. Yes, he's already talked so much nonsense about Bitcoin, saying it's a pyramid scheme that's only for criminals.
Even back in 2017, when Bitcoin was first worth $000, he said he would lay off, he would fire every employee of his company, his bank, if they traded in Bitcoin, because for him it would be proof of their stupidity . That's what he said back then, right? It's not nonsense. And uh, now crypto guru David Sex has tried to explain the topic of Bitcoin a little more to Jamie Diamond, hey, maybe you're exaggerating a bit.
And then Jamie Diamond said, "I am defending her right to buy." Do it. But he's simply not convinced by Bitcoin. Um, David Seck said in the interview – uh, I've already spoken to him about this and explained to him – that cryptocurrency is a new type of digital asset and represents a fundamental technological breakthrough , because we've never had anything digital that can also be scarce .
I tried to convince Jamie Diamond. Yes, he tried, but obviously without success. Um, Jamie Diamond says, uh, "If I were the government, I would shut it down." He said that in 2023. And that shows once again his understanding of Bitcoin. He really thinks the government could turn it off. Yes, he does n't understand what Bitcoin is all about and why it's so good.
Yes, I wish, I really wish Jamie Diamond were the government and would try it. That would make it visible to everyone. Nobody can turn it off, not even the government. No one can shut down Bitcoin, yes, but that simply shows his understanding of Bitcoin and also shows why he probably speaks so negatively about Bitcoin, because if he thinks a government could shut it down, then I also understand why he thinks it actually has no value.
Yes, and uh, nowadays there are many who have changed their view of the whole thing, especially since the Bitcoin Spot ETFs have been around. And that's another fun fact to add to the mix. Jamie Diamonds Bank, JP Morgan is one of the authorized partners for the Bitcoin Sport ETFs. What does that mean?
If BlackRock now issues a sports ETF, then they have to buy Bitcoin on the other side. Yes, and JP Morgan is one of the companies involved in this whole process of collecting the cash and so on. That means they are completely involved in this Bitcoin purchase process for the spot ETFs. They therefore benefit from this new business model.
Um, which is actually exactly what Jamie Diamond would have fired his employees for back in 2017. They're now trading in Bitcoin, and yet he doesn't understand it and thinks it's stupid. That's something to think about . Yes, that's right, but there are others too, e.g. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, who admits that he used to have the wrong idea about Bitcoin .
Yes, he used to think Bitcoin was a bad thing. He even referred to 2011 as an index for money laundering . Yes, and now he sees it as a legitimate financial instrument. He says: "As you know, I was a skeptic. I was a proud skeptic, and I studied it, learned about it, and came to the conclusion: Okay, my opinion was wrong for 5 years.
I believe that Bitcoin is legitimate." Yes, those are the words of someone who has the magnanimity to admit a mistake . I get the impression that Jamie Diamond simply doesn't have that stature . Um, in the end it doesn't really matter, because at least he says, yes, to scroll back up here, that he's defending her right to buy Bitcoin.
You do , right? He says: "Well, I don't think much of it . I also think it's nonsense, but you have a right to buy it. Go ahead. Yes, and if I do it through my bank, that's fine too, I'll even make some money from it." Well, you can think what you want about it. In the end, you'll see that nobody can avoid Bitcoin .
Even if he hates it and criticizes it. Everyone becomes dependent on it sooner or later, which makes Bitcoin a kind of Trojan horse. even if Jamie Diamond thinks it's stupid. Yes, then we have something else nice, namely this. Scott Besend, um, is the new US Treasury Secretary, and he just said something positive about the whole Bitcoin administration, saying we are investing heavily in digital assets.
If you like, I'll let it play for a bit, then just listen to his statements from the interview. Priority made a lot of these companies andush off what we want to do isly highest us regulatory and AML standards to digital assets especially stable coins and I've seen estimates that just over the Yes, so the Trump Administration is very interested in the topic of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency.
In particular, they want to apply anti-money laundering guidelines to stablecoins. This will be interesting for stablecoins as well. And that's what I've always said, things like USDT and other stablecoins are not decentralized currencies. Yes, they can be controlled centrally and also switched off or deactivated .
So, in that sense, it's all controllable. um, similar to a central bank digital currency, except that it is issued by private companies. And what the US also wants is to issue these coins , but that's why they also introduced this regulation that these coins must be backed by cash reserves, US dollars or US government bonds.
And that, of course, creates huge demand for US government bonds based on digital money, for which American money laundering guidelines apply. So, in the end, it's a bit like a central bank currency, except that it's not centrally controlled, but rather there can be a wide variety of issuers for stablecoins.
And there is a huge interest throughout the entire Trump administration, as I said, both in Bitcoin and in digital assets. And we should get into the habit of doing that, especially in the German media landscape, and I'd say among all the German journalists, because they still do n't do it. We need to start distinguishing between Bitcoin and cryptoassets.
Cryptoassets are securities, centrally issued crypto assets to which central rules can be applied and which can also be technically regulated. Bitcoin is a commodity in the eyes of Americans, and both are high priorities for Americans, but for a variety of reasons. German journalists who are unaware of this should slowly begin to recognize these differences, and it's about time, because the further time goes on, the more the German media landscape makes itself ridiculous with this misrepresentation, this topic.
So, here we are . Um on Truh Social, Donald Trump posted two days ago on May 22nd: "Heading to crypto dinner in Loden Country, Virginia in a little while. The USA is dominating in Crypto Bitcoin ETC and we are going to keep it that way." So he's saying here that we dominate crypto and Bitcoin here too.
Trump makes a distinction between crypto and Bitcoin, etc., meaning other digital assets like tokenized things that are not based on crypto networks, and he says: "We are going to keep that way." So, we remain the dominant force here. This shows once again that there is definitely a lot of interest in this topic .
Okay, now for something positive. In Texas, lawmakers have now voted for the Bitcoin Reserve, and um, there's now this, so the law, this bill SB1, SB21, sorry, it's also called the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and Act. It has now been completed. What does that mean? Held outside the state budget as a special fund, the whole thing is intended to strengthen the fiscal resilience of the state and can include any cryptocurrency that has had a market capitalization of at least 500 billion US dollars in the last 12 months, which currently only applies to Bitcoin.
Why do they make such laws and not just a Bitcoin law? Quite simply, there is a great deal of lobbying in the entire crypto world , which also influences politics . And even if their crypto assets don't yet have a market capitalization of 500 billion, with such a clause they have the theoretical potential to be included in such a reserve , which leads to them being more likely to vote for such a reserve, and then such a law gains supporters more quickly , right?
Whether the assets will actually be bought later, just because another cryptocurrency also reaches a market capitalization of 500 billion US dollars , is another matter entirely, but the point here is that one can also gather the, let's say, recently acquired lobby for the entire crypto market in order to get Bitcoin reserves on their way.
Yes, and that's how it was passed here, and with that we're next to New Hampshire and Arizona where, theoretically, such things can now be bought, namely Bitcoin and crypto assets in that sense, and we see that there is more demand for this topic. There are also many states that are against it. But I believe that the more people decide to do it, the less afraid others will be to take that first step and then possibly end up in the crosshairs of Bitcoin critics , like Jamie Diamond or Elizabeth Warren, the Democratic politician who attacked Bitcoin so strongly .
It has now been voted on , yes, by 101 to 42 votes, but the governor still has to sign it; however, the probability is very high. Texas is generally considered to be the Bitcoin state. Yes, there's a lot of Bitcoin mining going on there, mostly in the USA and so on. Texas is very open. Therefore, it is assumed that it will be approved by the governor, and if not, then probably only because some details might still be inconsistent or missing.
By the way, if you want to buy Bitcoin, check out the 21 Bitcoin App Austria . It is not only fully regulated in Austria , it also has a partnership with Deutsche Volksbank Reifeisenbank Bayernmitte. Bitcoin that you buy through a savings plan or directly can also be sent immediately to your own wallet.
However, you can also say – and this is a big advantage of this app – that this app only makes a payout to your own wallet after a certain amount has been reached . The advantage is that you can then save on transaction fees from the Bitcoinnet network. For example, you set up a savings plan of €100 per month and specify in this app that your Bitcoin should be paid out to your own wallet once it reaches the equivalent of €500 .
Then, for 5 months, €100 would be saved with the provider in Bitcoin, and as soon as this amount reaches €500, the provider will automatically transfer this Bitcoin to your own wallet. Using the code Blogtrainer will save you even more on fees from the provider itself and of course support our work.
You can find the link to the provider of the 21 Bitcoin app below in the video description.
Comments 0