people장 홈📈 Stock Masters주식 유튜브를 Articles로 읽고 Author의 예측을 실제 가격으로 확인합니다 people장 Board 홈요청하기

한국어 · English

제레미시겔

Accuracy score+1.3
순 place70
Scored calls338 calls
Hit rate / Market-adjusted / Return-weighted61.2% / 57.8% / 57.8%
1-month return / Market / beta excess return / Peer excess+1.2% / +0.8% / +0.3
Bullish / Bearish / Neutral40.3% / 23.9% / 35.8%
Best horizon1m
Performance badgeReliable badge,Consistent accuracy badge
Main channelCNBC Television
국적외
Note
Updated2026-10-28 07:00:00

Main stocks: #미국채금리 (200)#S&P500 (181)#미국기술주 (152)#나스닥 (46)#미국금융주 (33)

How scores are calculated

Calling it poor monetary policy is an understatement, Says Prof. Jeremy Siegel on Fed hikes

CNBC Television · 2022-09-23 · 유튜브 시청 148,931 · Board Views 6 · International

International

유튜브 썸네일

← 목록

저자: JeremySiegel · 외국인

요약 보기

Fed의 긴축이 과도하다는 결론이다. 근거: 원자재·주택가격 등 가격지표가 하락 전환했고 유가는 1월 수준으로 돌아갔다. 생산자물가(PPI)는 다음 주 성장 없거나 하락이 예상된다. 임금은 인플레이션을 따라잡는 중이라 물가 주범이 아니다. 통화지표: 통화량(M2) 감소폭이 전후 최대 수준으로 예상된다. 실질금리는 이미 모든 만기에서 플러스 영역에 들어섰다. 달러는 20~30년래 최고 수준이다. Fed 비판: 파월 의장은 2021년 인플레이션을 과소평가했고 지금은 과잉 대응한다. 기자회견에서 날카로운 질문이 없었고, 주택 지표 등 후행지표에 의존한다. 전망: Fed가 입장을 바꾸기 전까지 주식시장은 압박을 받을 것이다. 긴축 기조가 경기를 파괴할 수 있다.

다듬은 글

※ 자동 자막 원문(다듬기 전)

01. Professor Jeremy Siegel from the Wharton School of Business. He is joining us now. Professor, it's nice to see you again . What are your thoughts as we watch the Dow Jones Industrial Average break through its June lows, and perhaps other major indexes find themselves in a similarly precarious position in the coming days?

02. Yes, definitely. You know, Scott, it's funny to me to think back to the September meeting a year ago, when commodity prices were skyrocketing and home prices were rising at the fastest pace in postwar history. When all commodity prices were rising at a furious pace, Fed Chairman Powell and the Fed itself were claiming that they saw no inflation.

03. They said they see no need to raise interest rates in 2022. And now, with all those same goods and assets becoming cheaper, he sees stubborn inflation that requires the Fed to maintain tight policy throughout 2023. To me, this is completely absurd. Too harsh. We don't need to get close to that level to stop inflation, because it has effectively already stopped.

04. She practically stopped . I mean, the headline came in 3 minutes ago . Oil prices have returned to January levels. This was before Russia's invasion of Ukraine. You see what's happening with commodities . Next week we will get the producer price index . It will show no growth or even a decline for the first time in many years.

05. And this is a lagging indicator. Raw materials, all prices are going down. The only thing that is not going down is salaries. And, by the way, salaries are currently in the catch-up phase. There is no need to argue that they are pushing inflation. They lag behind inflation. Workers are trying to regain at least some of what inflation has eaten away.

06. I think the Fed is being too harsh. They are making the same mistake, but from a different angle, that they made a year ago. There are people who agree with you that the Fed is overreacting. Yes. But to say Absolutely. but that doesn't change anything in our current situation. If they continue to do this, whether you think it's right or not, what will it mean for the stock market?

07. Well, until he comes to his senses and says, "You know what? I don't think we should be so harsh." Until that happens, the stock market will be under pressure. I mean, this is probably one of the factors that can shed light on the situation. I mean, when you see how much real rates have increased, and the dollar is at its highest in 20 or 30 years.

08. By the way, next Tuesday we will receive monthly data on the money supply, which will show the largest drop in five months in the post-war period. That is, if he looks at any monetary or financial indicators, he cannot say, "Oh, we have to keep them high." At his press conference, he said: "We need to bring real rates into positive territory." They are already in positive territory for any maturity, for the first time in many years.

09. We are already there. Um, I mean, I thought that was as uninformative as possible. And no one asked him, you know, any difficult questions. How come we have 3.2 million new workers, while GDP is falling? What, what, what does this mean? What does a record drop in the money supply mean? I mean, what does a crash in commodity prices mean ?

10. What is this lag in the construction of housing indicators, which account for 40% of core inflation, which, as you know, will affect inflation over the next 12-15 months? Is that what he's looking at? Why is he looking at this? This is an inaccurate representation of what inflation is like in the housing sector.

11. That is, there were no difficult questions. There were, you know, 50 reporters there. I do n't know. They essentially said, " repeat the statement you made at the beginning ." There are so many things you can ask him about . What is he really looking at? He looks at three-month annual core inflation.

12. This is a lagging indicator. Well, we all look at the market. I mean, look at what the stock market is doing? He looks at market- oriented data. And that's exactly what the Fed should be looking at. I don't know if I've ever seen you so emotional. You seem very Yes, that's right. I am like that. I'm afraid it's like a pendulum.

13. They were too soft. As I've told you and many others throughout 2020, 2021, and now, oh my god, we're going to be very tough until we destroy the economy. I mean, to me, it's absolutely... to call it bad monetary policy would be an understatement.

원문 보기 · 글 내려 주세요 신청

← List으로
공유페이스북밴드

이 Articles에 대해 요청(숨김) 수정 요청

Comments 0