원문 보기
The World Economic Forum in Davos has now officially begun, and although Klaus Schwab is no longer CEO of the World Economic Forum and Larry Fink has now taken over the reins, the agenda looks very, very similar. Crucial points have changed, but the overall tone is still exactly the same. All participants seem to be fixated on getting their hands on your money and restricting how you are allowed to spend it.
It is quite obvious that they are trying to build a digital prison , because the focus is extremely strong on restricting freedom of expression. We can see that in the clips we're about to watch from Larry Fink. Ursula von der even talks about a monetary reset. 1971 year. She compares the whole thing to the mermaid shock of 1971, when the world moved away from the gold standard, and perhaps dreams of a beautiful new digital euro future in Europe.
And this whole agenda makes sense, of course, when you understand who is behind the World Economic Forum . Most people didn't even realize that Larry Fink is now the new CEO here. Some people here call him the mayor, the lifeguard. Of particular interest here was the fact that 60 days before his appointment, a very, very interesting article appeared in the Financial Times, which reads: It's time for the second draft of globalization, and here's a quote from it.
In a more nationally oriented globalization model, markets channel citizens' savings into local businesses and infrastructure. Larry Fink published this article, and it gives us a rough idea of where this could lead . It's also interesting to look at the agenda at the very top , where, at point 2 among the most important points that have been defined here, we have misinformation and disinformation.
So, the intention here is definitely to censor more, to steer public opinion more, and tools like a digital euro, a digital ID, asset registers, and whatever else is planned fit into that picture. And of course, fear is used to make the whole thing more appealing to people. This is also stated in this 2026 report, which the WF has published here.
As we enter the year 2026, the world is on the brink of an abyss; the turbulence caused by conventional wars and the strategic use of economic weapons continues to further disrupt society. The rules and institutions that have ensured stability for decades are threatened in a new era in which trade, finance and technology have become weapons of power projection.
And then the next thing that comes up is, okay, for that we now have to restrict freedom of expression . Ursel von der also once said that prebanking is better than debanking, so it's better to inoculate people first so that false information doesn't come to light, rather than having to correct any false information later .
However, there is a very, very large space for misinformation. We'll get to Ursula vonlein's new money reset plan in a moment. That means disinformation is a very, very big word. What is disinformation? What is actually declared as disinformation ? If you say tomorrow that Bitcoin is cool, the EU will declare that to be disinformation.
We can also listen directly to Larry Fink here, to what he says about the current goals. That was the opening speech. We'll see . Well, that sounds very, very good at first , more like a diversity of opinions. We should listen to more voices and so on , new ideas. Incidentally, another new idea is that they have finished with the green walls .
That means Germany has really messed up. Everything that has been done in Germany with renewable energies and such has simply been completely destroyed by Larry Fink in a single aside in the WOS. And now it gets interesting, because if you hear this, first it says something like, " We have to be open," and then comes the next thing.
But we also need to be open to ideas that we might not like so much, and he's already framing that now, because we could have ideas like a digital euro and so on. And that's just one example. There are of course thousands of examples, introduce, and even though people don't like it, they still have to swallow these ideas .
Yes, the second sentence in particular was interesting. The aim here is to convey the idea that more global control and less national sovereignty is something the public should accept. So, it's always about centralization versus decentralization. And what always comes out very clearly is that we need more centralized power, we need less decentralized power.
We can control things better centrally than decentrally. We need to make sure that we organize things in a more centralized way here. This is also mentioned in the report here, which explains why the globalists' dominance in interpreting the narrative and the media transformation are so threatening.
Quote: "Parallel to growing concerns about disinformation and misinformation, trust in news is declining, while news avoidance is increasing." So people should now watch more news again and trust the central, let's say, television sets more. That's essentially the afterthought of the agenda here. That means framing people like, " Ah, hey, go watch Bratw TV again, watch AED and ZDF again." This is exactly what you need, because it sets the right agenda.
Here's another quote. For the first time in the USA, more people get their news via social media and video platforms than via television or traditional news websites. And this is, of course, a very, very bleak message we are receiving here from the World Economic Forum. I think it's a really great development that we now have social media.
I mean, just look at this. We have almost 2 million views per month on this channel. That means more people are watching this channel, like some of the strange public broadcasting MKS propaganda stories or something. I recently had a video with 150,000 views. I was just looking at how many people watch Bundesliga games.
150,000 views on the Bundesliga match. Of course, she doesn't mean to imply that I now have a wider reach than public broadcasters. Of course, they still have a large reach, especially among many older people, but I'm just one of very, very many. There are many other great people. There's Blocktrainer, there's Nico Yilch, there's Sunny Decree, there are so many great Bitcoin channels, and also independently of that, there are many cool channels that simply report on what's going on in the world .
Because if you want political content, you'd look at something like " Stocks with Brains" or something similar, and not necessarily watch the news here. What I also found interesting was that they are now switching from stakeholder capitalism back to shareholders, so moving away from stakeholder capitalism, but the agenda is still the same.
It's supposed to be like, there are always two sides: communism, or let's say central planning, state planning, or free markets and capitalism. And of course, they're now doing WDNG, meaning word salad change, but fundamentally, the agenda is still more towards communism, more towards central planning, and what was also funny was that they confuse climate change with weather change.
So, here the salad is simply transformed and exchanged a bit, but underneath the scenes the direction is still the same, and now it gets really intense. Ursula is coming from the line now. If I understand correctly, she's actually talking about a money reset here. 1971 year. So we know all that. The Dixen and Nixen shock of 1971 was probably one of the most far-reaching financial events of the last 50 years, when gold was decoupled from the US dollar.
Since then, printing has been possible without end. And that's a really, really crazy thing, because why is it comparing itself to what it considers the biggest monetary event of perhaps even the last 100 years? Why is she talking about this ? This isn't just a random choice, she chose this... Oh, she chose this...
What's going on here ? She's got something planned here. And now let's continue. So in one second there was such a massive shock that the whole system practically collapsed, the whole system realigned itself, and yes, that's absolutely true. But some people still have n't gotten the message . There are still people who think money is linked to gold.
inadvert, so that has also led to a strengthening of the economic power in Europe, and I agree with that. But at some point, all of that changed. Was it around 2000? There's a statistic that shows that in 2000, some of the world's largest companies were still located in Europe. At that time, GDP growth rates in Europe were still extremely good compared to the USA.
They were almost on the same level and then they massively screwed up. Was that around the year 2000, or I do n't know the exact statistics, but roughly around that time? That means she is partly right, but she is also completely wrong. Because everything has been massively screwed up here in recent years, and judging by the current trend, it will only get worse.
And what's interesting is that she essentially always sees herself as a competitor with the USA here as well. Perhaps they want to do their own thing more here now. That's why we have the digital euro and similar systems. The aim is to reduce dependence on other currencies. So she takes that example, saying that back then they reduced their dependence on the US dollar, and then at some point the DMark came along, and that worked quite well too .
The Demark was in demand, and much more besides, and now the exciting part is that she is talking about ending the dependency, and that is exactly the argument that Christine Lagardmer is making. Um, we are too dependent on the United States and blah blah blah, and the digital euro will make us less dependent.
We need to create the payment rates and things like that here. So, if you ask me, this is pretty much in line with the digital Euro agenda . geopolitical shocks and mustveortunity, so one should create a new form of Europe here. You should use these shocks; the idea is to make everything new. That's almost in line with what Christin Lagard says, who even speaks of the Euro as the world's leading currency, and I don't know if that goes a step too far.
Or rather, I know for sure that it goes a step too far. Imagine that. The EU with the world's leading currency, Donald Trump is laughing his head off. Scott Bess has once again completely destroyed everything Verlein is saying in a single sentence. So, does the EU have any financial weapons it could use against the USA, any power, any authority or anything like that?
No. Did you hear it? Does the EU possess any instruments of power vis-à-vis the USA, any financial weapons? Just say: "Nope." And I think he's right about that . And if you want this massive financial weapon, I'll put a link to 21 Bitcoin below. You can easily buy Bitcoin there, use the code Bitcoin Hotel, and save up to 20% on fees when buying Bitcoin. See you later. Link is below.
Comments 0