원문 보기
Hi everybody. Let's get straight to the point. Today we're going to delve into a topic that never gets old. The line between illusion and reality is truly thin in the stock market. Whether you're a complete newcomer to the market or a seasoned investor, these core lessons are sure to give you pause for thought.
There. Let's get started. The material we're using as a springboard for today's analysis comes from the Millennium Edition of the classic book on top of the street. Its author is none other than Peter Lynch. To be honest, in the financial world, his name is like a monument . Under Magellen's guidance, the Fidelity Fund generated unprecedented returns from the 1970s to the 1990s.
This book is particularly interesting because it transforms dry statistics into a practical investment strategy that anyone can apply. Today's content will cover four main parts. First, let's look back at the boom era. Next, we will expose the ancient illusion of pfiếu.com. Then they discussed the importance of profit.
Finally, and most practically, are the smart investment strategies . Part one, the boom era of the 90s. Take a look at these numbers. The speed was incredibly fast. In 1989, only about 32% of households in the United States invested in the stock market. By 1990, the Dow Jones was languishing at 2400 points.
But then, all of a sudden, in 1999, the Dow Jones soared to 11,000 points. This means that the number of households in the US holding stocks has increased by more than fourfold, and half of them now own stocks. Going public suddenly became commonplace; everyone in the family was talking about stocks.
And here's $25 trillion. That's an unbelievable number, isn't it? That's the enormous amount of new wealth that was created across the entire market during that crazy decade. No wonder countless novices and amateur investors rush into it like moths to a flame. That's obvious . Who wouldn't want a bite out of this $25 trillion pie?
But every party has its end . We move on to part two. Stock Photo.com. Anyone involved in investing is probably very familiar with the price-to-performance ratio, right? The price-to-profit ratio. But during the tech bubble era, people in the provinces used to joke that the letter 'e' meant profits had vanished into thin air.
Companies like ghost.com are springing up like mushrooms, but their profits are zero. When the fundamental issue—income—is nonexistent, all that's left is the "P" (presumably a symbol of profit or loss) to fight for. The price has been inflated to an absurd level. Companies are valued at billions of dollars even before they've made a single penny.
At that time, the market was divided into two extremely opposing halves. On one side is the addiction to the market, which means constantly staring at the stock ticker, watching prices fluctuate every second, and recklessly spending money on unrealistic future prospects. On the other hand, there's the fundamental reality of business.
The core of investing that ultimately fails is the profit generated by the company. The problem is that when the crowd gets caught up in the stock price and completely ignores the true health of the company, that's when disaster strikes. Let me give you an example to illustrate this absurdity. According to documents, Rosperoy's EDS electronic data system was traded at a price 500 times its revenue at the time.
Does anyone understand what this number means? That means if company profits remain constant, it would take us a full five centuries. Yes, 500 years just to recoup the initial investment. It sounds like science fiction, but it's a stark reality that shows just how terrifying a market can be when it loses its mind.
So how can we avoid being deceived by illusions? Moving on to part three, we return to the importance of profit. Let's try a very basic logic problem about a hypothetical internet company . Let's assume this company has 100 million shares trading at $100 per share. So its scale is $10 billion, right?
Then the crowd rushed in to buy, expecting the price to increase tenfold. That means the company needs to be valued at $100 billion. Now let's generously apply a P/E ratio of 40 times . So what is the reverse problem? For that $100 billion price tag to be justified, the company would have to generate $2.5 billion in profit annually.
Hearing about $2.5 billion in profits during the internet boom sounds normal, right? Not at all. The chilling truth is that in 1999, only three corporations in the entire United States achieved that level of enormous annual profit—just three. Yet, people expect that fledgling .com companies can easily break into this exclusive club.
It is this mathematical fragility that exposes the illusion of the market. Now that we know where the trap is, how do we survive? Moving on to part four, wise investment strategies . This document actually offers some very insightful moves. The number one rule, of course, is to stay away from businesses that aren't making money.
Next, you can target the periphery, using strategies like "bird and shovel" or investing in companies that benefit indirectly, such as transportation services or those that make network infrastructure equipment . And there's something really interesting called the free internet game, which involves investing in traditional, profitable companies with stable stock prices, but which are secretly building a highly promising internet business within them.
I need to elaborate on this "national bird and shovel" strategy because its analogy is so brilliant. Going back in time to the gold rush era, the vast majority of those who dreamed of striking it rich ended up empty-handed. So who is rich? These were the people who sold hoes, shovels, tents, and even Levi's jeans to those miners.
The same applies when considering the internet context . Instead of blindly betting on unknown websites, savvy minds would buy shares in delivery companies or network equipment manufacturers like Cisco. The higher the fever gets, the faster the selling becomes, and they quietly rake in the money while everyone else is busy gambling.
Here's another extremely insightful comparison between selling computers and selling fuel. The big players in the computer hardware industry are constantly battling each other with price wars to grab market share, ultimately eroding their own profit margins. But Microsoft is playing a completely different game.
They stayed out of that bloody hardware war . They sell the operating system, the core gas or fuel that any machine needs to run. This brilliant move helped Microsoft's stock price skyrocket tenfold. Dad is so smart. Looking through these history lessons , it's clear that nothing has become outdated.
To conclude today's analysis , there's a core question we should all ask ourselves before placing an order. Is the price we're paying for a stock reflecting a fleeting illusion of the crowd, or is it based on solid future returns ? Ignore the noise of the market, ignore the flashing green and red electronic display board.
Ultimately, sustainable investing is about buying into businesses that are truly profitable. Thank you everyone for following this breakdown. Let's all try to keep a cool head amidst the frenzied fluctuations of the market. T
Comments 0