people장 홈📈 Stock Masters주식 유튜브를 Articles로 읽고 Author의 예측을 실제 가격으로 확인합니다 people장 Board 홈요청하기

한국어 · English

피터시프

Accuracy score-1.8
순 place179
Scored calls1346 calls
Hit rate / Market-adjusted / Return-weighted42.9% / 50.2% / 40.8%
1-month return / Market / beta excess return / Peer excess-1.4% / -1.0% / -0.6
Bullish / Bearish / Neutral41.0% / 41.5% / 17.5%
Best horizon1d
Performance badgeLate call badge,Inverse badge
Main channelPlain Finance Reborn
국적외
Note
Updated2026-10-28 07:00:00

Main stocks: #금 (656)#미국채금리 (648)#미국기술주 (432)#BTC (272)#S&P500 (256)

How scores are calculated

"Peter Schiff Predicts The 'Gold Supply Squeeze' Will ChangeThe Financial World"

InVest USA · 2023-06-17 · 유튜브 시청 121 · Board Views 8 · International

International

유튜브 썸네일

← 목록

저자: PeterSchiff · 외국인

요약 보기

한줄결론: 영상은 정치·법적 논쟁이 중심이며, 대상 자산에 대한 가격 방향 예측 발언은 없음. 주제1: 듀럼 보고서와 FBI 조사 - 듀럼 보고서상 트럼프 관련 조사의 근거가 없었다는 주장 - 힐러리 클린턴 수사와 대비되는 정치적 편향 주장 주제2: 내부고발자 처우 - FBI 내부고발자 3인이 해고된 사례를 언급 - 정부 권력 남용을 고발한 사람이 오히려 배신자로 취급된다고 주장 주제3: 본인에 대한 정부 조사 - 본인의 은행(Silvergate 등)이 IRS와 법무부 조사를 받았다고 주장하며 정치적 신념 때문이었다고 설명 - 호주에서 진행 중인 명예훼손 소송을 언급 주제4: 타 기관 비교 - 같은 지역 FTX 샘 뱅크먼프리드는 민주당에 기부했다는 이유로 조사받지 않았다고 주장 주제5: 자본주의 옹호 - 돈을 버는 것은 정당하며 개인의 권리이자 행복 추구의 기본이라는 입장 언급 종목/자산: 없음 (금 등 대상 자산 관련 가격 전망 발언 미확인) 출연자 전망: 해당 영상에서 시장 전망 발언 없음

다듬은 글

※ 자동 자막 원문(다듬기 전)

01. but who is guilty is the media the government the FBI right for investigating it because now we know based on this Durham report that there was no evidence to suggest that this was true yet they investigated these claims anyway despite you know no evidence that there was anything that that there was to investigate in contrast to the decisions regarding Hillary Clinton because they will acknowledge that there was far more evidence that Hillary Clinton did something wrong than Donald Trump yet why wasn't Clinton investigated because it didn't fit the political agenda Trump right was investigated because of politics because of what he was associated with he was a bad guy because he was a Republican or a conservative even though I don't even regard him as a conservative but you know the left things he is right that's their definition of a conservative and so he was a bad guy and so therefore the investigators either deliberately uh did this out of politics or their judgment was just compromised that because of their own personal perspective that clouded their judgment and so they assumed the worst out of trump because they just assumed he's a bad guy because he's a conservative and they gave Clinton the benefit of the doubt because you know she's a good guy or gal right she's one of the good ones because she cares she's she's a she's a Democrat so she's good and so we'll cut her some slack right so that it's a bias in the regulatory uh body and of course these are all bureaucrats these are all government people so they're going to be biased uh to why government because they they work for government right so they want to see themselves as the good guys you know working for this benevolent government and so if somebody is critical of government maybe a conservative libertarian well they're bad and and this is further reinforced by what's going on with this FBI whistleblowers uh hearings if you've seen any of those but you have these three guys that were fired for blowing the whistle which you're not supposed to I mean there's all these laws to protect whistleblowers unless of course the person blowing the whistle is a conservative blowing the whistle on some liberal well then you've got no protection whatso all you're just a tattletail we got to fire you right for for tattling you know but you know they're actually making out like these whistleblowers or a bunch of Traders and in fact what they were doing was standing up for the rights of Americans because if you're working for the government and you think that some of your uh Associates in your department at the FBI if they are you know violating the rights of other Americans because they're they're weaponizing their power they're using their Authority the color of law to go after and target people due to their politics due to what they believe in and and this is the ultimate Corruption of government using government Force to silence opposing political views and so what was going on here is you had parents right say they were opposed to masking up their kids during covid uh or maybe they didn't want their kids exposed to a lot of this transgender stuff at a young age uh when they really shouldn't be exposed to anything related to sexuality I mean let them enjoy kindergarten right you don't have to you know hit them over the head with all the stuff so you have some parents uh that disagree or also you had some stuff with January 6th and all of a sudden the FBI is all over these guys like you know you know they're selling nuclear secrets uh to to to the Russians during the Cold War and like you know and you have some people in the FBI like blowing the whistle on these other people that hey you are mistreating American citizens you know you are uh you know using your power right to punish people for their beliefs and you are unfairly persecuting American citizens right and so they're blowing the whistle and instead of being rewarded they're labeled Traders and they're fired traitors to who they're not traders to the people see they're traitors to the government right if the government is corrupt and you try to blow the whistle on that corruption you're a hero to the public but the government doesn't look at you as a hero they look at you as as the villain as a traitor to what they're doing but again they think what they're doing is good right if they believe right that that that they're on the political High Ground right they can't see uh the the ill effects right that they don't see the the adverse consequences they just assume we're the good guys and and so it doesn't matter what individual rights are individual liberties it's the ends justifies the means as far as the left is concerned so if somebody Blows the Whistle on due process on the rule of law on innocent until proven guilty on all this on abuse and power if they're blowing the whistle on something that the left thinks is good well then you know you're not a whistleblower uh you are a Trader and you're gonna get fired and and that's what happened uh in this circumstances and that's what happened to me you know a lot of people and I on my last podcast I talked a lot about you know what's going on with my defamation lawsuit in in Australia and are people like you know who cares we don't want a lot of people you know we don't care about this this is a big thing because it ties into everything that we're seeing with the whistleblowers uh or with the Durham report only I've got first-hand knowledge of this the rest of it I'm I'm learning just like everybody else I'm watching the news I'm reading stuff but I live this and so I can give everybody first-hand Knowledge from my own experience about how I was persecuted by the government for my political beliefs that I expressed why did the IRS investigate my bank why did the justice department investigate my bank there was no evidence that anybody at my bank did anything wrong the only thing there was was me my beliefs that I espouse on this podcast that I expose in interviews that I do uh on television right with the Press it was my beliefs that were the basis of the entire investigation you know what we it's not an accident that they picked my bank look at all these other banks in Puerto Rico why don't they investigate them what about all these other Banks all around the country what about FTX I mean they were in a bank right but they were in the Bahamas right bankman freed he was just a couple Islands away from me right the same area why didn't all these guys that were investigating my bank why didn't they investigate Sam bankman freed over at FTX because that guy had the opposite political opinion to me he was out there virtue signaling talking about global warming and and and all the the buzzwords that were important and he was lavishing all kinds of money on all these Democrats I didn't give a nickel any of these Democrats right I didn't I didn't pay these people off so he was a good guy because he was a major donor to the good guys to the Democrats who cared and of course he cared right he was out there saying I don't want to make any money no I'm earning to give right that's the only reason I to make money so I can give it all away right you know so I'm an unabashed capitalist I don't apologize for capitalism I don't apologize for making money right I think we all have that's it that's our our Birthright that's the pursuit of happiness how do you pursue happiness you got to make some money right to buy the things that make you happy now there are some things that you don't have to buy to make you happy but most of us the things that we want right we gotta we gotta earn the money to pay for it and even if it's not if we just want to put food on the table you got to earn that too right in a real economy you want to eat you got to go out there and you gotta either you gotta kill something or you gotta earn enough money to pay somebody to kill it for you but you gotta eat right you know you need a roof over your house so either you build a house yourself but you get a job and you earn some money and you pay somebody else to fill it

원문 보기 · 글 내려 주세요 신청

← List으로
공유페이스북밴드

이 Articles에 대해 요청(숨김) 수정 요청

Comments 0