Charlie Munger 💎6 Ideologies to Successful Investing💎 (Billionaire's Mindset)

요약 보기

결론: 멍거는 장기 보유자는 주가 50% 하락도 견딜 기질이 필요하며, 단순한 투자 원칙(이해 가능한 사업, 지속 경쟁우위, 정직한 경영진, 안전마진 있는 가격)이 핵심이라고 강조한다. 투자 철학: 장기 주주는 시장 변동성을 받아들여야 하며, 보통주 주주로 적합하려면 50% 하락에도 평정심을 유지해야 한다고 주장. 투자 원칙 4가지: 이해 가능한 사업, 내재적 특성에서 나오는 지속 가능한 경쟁우위, 높은 integrity와 재능을 가진 경영진, 무한정 비싸지 않은 가격(안전마진 확보). 원칙이 확산되지 않는 이유: 너무 단순해서 전문가 집단이 존재 이유를 정당화하기 어렵다는 점을 지적. 코카콜라 사례: 성장 전망 대비 주가가 저평가된 시기에 수개월간 대량 매수했던 경험을 소개. 매수 관점: 주식 1주가 아니라 기업 전체를 사는 관점으로 가격을 계산하며, 전체 기업 가치 대비 합리적 가격보다 낮을 때 매수. 멍거의 기여: 멍거가 없었어도 버크셔는 성공했을 것이라는 평가 질문에 대해 정기적인 대화를 언급. 후계 전망: 버크셔는 극도로 분권화된 대기업으로, 두 창업 경영진 이후에도 지속 가능한 미래가 있다고 전망. 워런 버핏 사후 기여가 생전 기여를 크게 능가할 것이라고 주장. 출연자 전망: 특정 종목에 대한 단기 가격 예측 없음.

다듬은 글

※ 자동 자막 원문(다듬기 전)

01. people don't seem to get that point you have any idea why charlie lauren if people weren't so often wrong we wouldn't be so rich how worried are you by the declines in the share price of berkshire hathaway the difficulties this is the third time that warren and i have seen our holdings in berkshire go down top tick to bottom tick by 50 percent i think it's the nature of long-term shareholding with the normal vicissitudes and in worldly outcomes and in markets that the long-term holder has his quoted value of his stock go down and then by say 50 percent in fact you can argue that if you're not willing to react with equanimity to a market price decline of 50 percent two or three times a century you're not fit to be a common shareholder and you deserve the mediocre result you're going to get compared to the people who do have the temperament who can be more philosophical about these market fluctuations we have to deal with things that we're capable of understanding then once we're over that filter we have to have a business with some intrinsic characteristics that give it a durable competitive advantage and then of course we would vastly prefer a management place with a lot of integrity and talent and finally no matter how wonderful it is it's not worth an infinite price so we have to have a price that makes sense and gives a margin of safety considering the natural visiting of life that's a very simple set of ideas and the reason that our ideas have not spread faster is they're too simple the professional classes can't justify their existence if that's all i have to say i mean it's also obvious and so simple what would they have to do with the rest of the semester it was succeeding mightily on multiple fronts and it was cheap in relation to what was plainly going to happen that was a valuable insight there are times when even a company as big as coca-cola is too cheaply priced by the market considering what it's going to do for the shareholder and there are times when we can figure that out and there are times when we can't and the times when we can figure it out we tend to go in heavily for many many months we were buying as much coca-cola as we could buy roughly a third of the volume trading every day for months so we were very aggressive in buying into coca-cola we have the mindset of the person that's buying the whole business at the price you would realize by multiplying the price we're paying by share by the number of outstanding shares and and we want the price for the whole business so calculated to look very attractive so we like buying individual shares at a price that's lower than we think a rational person would pay if he could buy the whole business bourne would have been a huge success if charlie munger had never lived how often do you speak to him well in the early days it was almost every day and now it's maybe once a week only once a week but sometimes it's a long conversation you and warren are very much a double act in the chairman and vice chairman of the company at some point you want to probably retire don't you step down rest a bit well i don't think either of us wants to quit except as the laws of physiology force it and that no doubt will be soon on us but um you got to remember that berkshire is probably the most decentralized big corporation in the world i think the very decentralization of berkshire and the extreme pockets of talent and all the subsidiaries will give berkshire a very respectable future long after we're gone and you've got to remember that we started with a little nothing and our successors are starting with something that is not a little nothing and you ought to be able to achieve a lot more when you're given a mighty hand than you were when you start with a little nothing now they won't be able to multiply money as fast per share because that can't happen when you're working with such large sums but in terms of a creditable institution that serves the wider world i think bircher's contribution after warren is dead will utterly dwarf the contribution made while he was alive