저자: BillAckman · 외국인
요약 보기
애크먼은 사업 품질·장기 보유 중심 투자 철학으로의 변화를 설명하고, AI가 기존 기업 해자를 위협할 수 있어 디스럽션 위험이 커졌다고 진단. 마이크로소프트·메타·아마존은 과소평가돼 있다고 주장. 스페이스X 등 비상장 고밸류 기업은 벤처 투자처럼 사람과 기회를 보고 판단해야 한다고 언급. 코로나 당시 시장 저평가를 지적했던 경험과 퍼싱스퀘어 구조(PSUS 할인율 등) 소개.
다듬은 글
One of the most provocative and interesting investors in the country. A legendary activist investor. Pershing Square CEO and founder Bill Ackman. Taking a short position and going public with it is a pretty serious business. Interestingly, some of the best businesses in the world are trading at the lowest multiples.
We're kind of the rebirth of the closed-end investment company universe. What did you think of Zara, the CEO of OpenAI? I'm sorry. CFO. Felt like the CEO. Yeah, I I was Stop with that stuff. Uh actually, I was super impressed. Uh made me a lot more bullish on OpenAI, and I thought Right? I thought she should be CEO of OpenAI.
That's what I thought. I think Sam should be I think Sam should be chair. I think he's much better. a question I wanted to ask her that we didn't get time, which was what's it like working with Sam? I mean, that could have been like the hours in the documentary. I wanted to kick this off at So, thank you so much for being here.
We've tried a number of times to get you to All-In, and it's great to to finally have you. You obviously are a legend doesn't need much of an introduction. Lately, in the the last number of call it years or months or quarters or what have you, it seems like your investment philosophy may be changing.
Your model, where you've been activist and you've entered positions and exited positions, and lately you've talked a lot about more kind of permanent long-term holdings. Would love to hear a little bit about if that is actually a change and how your evolution in your investment model has kind of changed over over time.
Uh sure. So, I would say the biggest change over time is an appreciation for the importance of I would call business quality. Long-term, durable, protected, non-disruptable growth, I would say. Early days, you're smaller, more liquid investor, you don't have to think as long-term. As you become a bigger, concentrated investor, uh
[snorts] and over time you learn the importance of durable kind of growth. That's the most important factor. Uh I would say I'm as activist as I've ever been um but more of it's on Twitter than it than uh I would say in the corporate context. And the reason for that is when I started in uh Pershing Square no one sort of knew who we were.
And so I actually one of our first investments was Wendy's International. Wendy's owned Tim Hortons, the Canadian coffee and donut chain, and the value of Tim Hortons was more than the entire value of Wendy's. We had this very simple idea: buy Wendy's, spin off Tim Hortons, double our money. And uh we bought 10% of the company and I called the CEO and he didn't return my call.
And I called him again, he didn't return my call. I literally couldn't get a return phone call. That was the beginning. Uh so we actually I called a friend who worked at Blackstone and Steve Schwarzman agreed to write a fairness opinion on what Wendy's would be worth if we spun off Tim Hortons. We kind of mailed it in, filed it publicly, and 6 weeks later they spun off Tim Hortons.
And then the CEO finally called me back and uh he thanked me uh and he had gotten fired uh and and uh but he thanked me cuz he had a huge exit package and and and he was very happy. But so in the beginning we couldn't get a return phone call, so we had to and we were small, so we had to go to a conference and we had to, you know, do presentations and go on CNBC.
What happens over time is you join boards of directors, you become known as an investor, you know, we're kind of a constructive shareholder. Um I know pretty much every CEO in the S&P 500 either directly or one person removed. And you know, maybe I age I've aged a bit um but you build kind of a reputation and today we buy a stake in a company sometimes they'll put out a tweet saying you know, we welcome Pershing Square as a shareholder, but they open the door for us.
You know, in the beginning we had to bang down the door and today so we we get very deeply involved in our companies if it's needed. [snorts] Uh other companies we own, there's no nothing for us to do, just be the you know, just clap. Hm. So you are you are considered a value add investor. Yeah, but we only want to add value.
I The conversation last night was kind of an interesting one. You know, the best investments are one where you don't need to join the board and do anything. Well, that may be in a startup, but in a mature business, it may be No, I think in in the public company context, one of the valuable things we can do, that you know, the problem of being a public company today is kind of the very short-term nature of markets, analysts, etc.
And obviously to run a business, a business is a, you know, a good one is a forever thing. And you want to make decisions in the context of decades sometimes or certainly three, five years. And how can you do that when someone's asking about the tax rate in the second quarter? Um and having a big shareholder on the board, where you can kind of test ideas out with the big shareholder before you expose them to the public, where the big shareholder can say, "I'm supportive of this initiative even though it's going to hurt earnings in the next few quarters." is a helpful thing.
I just want to connect this last conversation with Sarah to this. Um are you an investor in the AI complex? And how do you underwrite business model quality from what you see on the outside and in the entire complex? I mean, yes, effectively we're an investor. We're Actually today we own Microsoft, we own Meta, we own Amazon.
Uh actually I think you're either directly or indirectly you're invested in AI. Yeah. Or it's a threat. So you have to you have to understand it. Um how do I think about AI in a business model context? model quality, yeah. Look, when you're a concentrated investor or an investor generally and you're long-term investor, the most important and most challenging thing to do is determine what's the risk of disruption.
What's the risk of two guys, two women from Stanford in a garage, you know, coming up with something? That risk I think has gone up uh dramatically. This is the greatest era in history to to build a business, right? There's unlimited access to compute, you know, certainly for a startup, uh unlimited access to capital, uh and a lot of incredible talent, which means that the probability of your being disrupted has gone up enormously.
So the hardest thing you have to do as an investor is understand, you know, and and that's really where we spend most of our time. in a moment like this then? Do you swing towards the chaos or do you reposition to things that are maybe more durable and defensible from AI where the destructibility is less?
What's interesting about markets is people always bring their eye to the new new thing. Um and the new new thing is sort of chips and semiconductors and energy and that's where, you know, uh the shorter-term capital's going. What tends to happen is really high-quality things get left behind. Um and the same thing really happened, you know, I was I was there in 2000, you know, when the in the in the in that sort of bubble.
This is, you know, this is different. I'm not saying this is um but there's some analogies and the analogies are people got excited about internet stocks and Berkshire Hathaway traded at the lowest valuation I think it ever traded at in its history as people said, "Okay, that's all old stuff." I think a similar thing is happening today in a in a sense to Amazon and Meta, Microsoft.
Those are the ones that These are these are old-fashioned companies in kind of this, you know, the open AI So they're undervalued in your mind? Yes. What else is undervalued? What about the SaaS apocalypse though? Is it oversold at this point? Uh again, I think it's a careful analysis. I worry more about a Salesforce um than I do about your kind of um I think you got to do the work.
I think it's one company at a time, but I think if, you know, if your software company today, you have to be as AI enabled as you can. You can I I think there have been sort of monopolistic type profit taking off of customers when someone had a kind of a niche software product that charging, you know, 30,000 a year or something like this.
I think those companies are really at risk. Uh you know, Microsoft when the average customer's paying, I don't know, 50 bucks a seat or some small number, uh that platform's worth a lot more uh and is less of risk. I want to go back um to COVID because you had an incredibly viral moment where you were on CNBC at that moment and you pounded the table and you said this is what's going to happen and literally the market just ripped and you you were well first it went traded massively down you were right on that side of the trade and then you were on the right side of the trade when it ripped back up.
And then I think it was maybe a month or two ago I think publicly you basically pounded the table and said this market's going way higher. Can you just put us in your head like where does that desire to be so active and you know you you it gives you so much room to be wrong but then when you're right it does add to the lore of Bill Ackman of which you have a lot so how do you balance that where does it come from like why in these moments do you just get so convicted that the that the conviction just has to spill out and then you're just so out there?
So I've always been like my high school yearbook epithet was most verbose. Uh me too. And that and actually my my friend actually lives around here uh he he has quote that he put next to my name in my yearbook says a closed mouth gathers no foot that was his. And so that's kind of what I've lived by I've always had this sort of desire to speak the truth about things and you know was just talking with Jake actually we had breakfast this morning.
Uh and we're talking about my Rhonda post do you remember that one so you know there's just certain things that need to be shared and discussed. But with respect respect to markets I actually what happened was I was concerned about the country because I felt we needed to have a basically a two-week pause and this is March of or February I guess it was March of 2020 and I assumed we were going to just do a short-term shutdown let the virus cool down as hospitals were going to getting overwhelmed.
And the president hadn't done that yet I was kind of surprised by this. And so that that was what inspired me to go on TV as a way to reach uh President Trump and say, "Look, we need to shut down the country just for 2 weeks, you know, like uh and I said, "Look, you do this, okay? The virus will blow over.
Stocks are at an incredibly cheap valuation. If we handle this correctly, you're going to make a ton of money, and we're buying." You know, valuation is like a tether on the market, right? When it gets too high, it's like this rubber band that's stretching. And inevitably, it bounces back. But it works the other way as well.
When stocks get too cheap, there's this, you know, the the rubber band's actually pulling valuations up. Right. And and so there are there are certain moments where it gets to that place. And sometimes, actually, if you call that out, it causes people to have kind of a psychological reset. What happened recently that caused you to call that out?
Stocks just got crazy cheap. Just incredibly cheap of really high-quality companies. Right. What I don't know I I don't know why extremely cheap in fundamentals and Fundamentals based on, you know, what's the value of a financial asset's present value of the cash it generates over its life. On that basis, stocks are of really high-quality companies are really cheap.
Is there any way to underwrite and you know, I don't want to pick on specific companies, but we have the three that are going public, and then you have like a Palantir, let's say. And these things have become in very popular in pop culture, in maxing on subreddits, on, you know, the public's consciousness, high-net-worth individuals wanting to buy into SPVs that are double loaded and then getting wiped off the cap tables.
Is there any way to underwrite 100 times revenue, 50 times revenue, 150 times revenue in these companies, or are these just tremendously overvalued because of the demand side? I think you underwrite a SpaceX the way you underwrite a venture capital investment. Interesting. Explain that. Unpack it. So, everyone here invests in venture, right?
You know, you bet on, you know, who's running it, right? The talent is enormous. Um it's people who they taught me I had a professor business school he said people opportunity context deal. So on people SpaceX One of one. Yeah. Opportunity one of one. Context you know, incredible and actually you know, feel bad for Blue Origin but not harmful to SpaceX the fact that you know, they're they're biggest
way behind. Then you get to deal, okay? That's the more complicated question for SpaceX. Again, we don't know what the valuation is going to be but if it's a billion a trillion 750 billion dollars then you say, okay, well, let's think five years out. What does this company look like? You know, what is Starlink?
What's the trajectory of Starlink? You know, SpaceX's you know, near monopoly in terms of low cost space launch that's going to become increasingly important and even Amazon is going to have to become an even bigger customer because they're not you know, Blue Origin's you know, and and time I would say has become increasingly valuable in the AI era, right?
You you delay a model we were talking David and I were talking about the administration and and his kind of stepping in for the president not to sign that executive order to kind of slow us down. Allegedly. You lose a month, you lose a couple of months today and it means a lot. So I think the only question I have and I haven't done the math, I you know, I I actually invested in X I invested in XAI.
I'm in an SPV. Ron Baron said, Bill you got to invest in SpaceX so so I'm I'm I'm in so now I have so obviously I'm rooting for kind of a good outcome. I just doesn't I haven't done the Yeah, you have to What about Anthropic, OpenAI and Palantir? Okay, I'm sorry. Uh Anthropic, OpenAI, Palantir also fall into this category.
Do you underwrite those as venture investments as well and have you done the the work on those? They're venture investments that do what what's helpful is they're not seed or series A, right? They're you know, D or E but they're still like venture investments. These companies have proven they can generate a lot of revenues and actually I was just saying on Sarah, I thought she had a very, very thoughtful explanation on how they think about committing capital, right?
And and that's the thing I haven't heard from on OpenAI, which is why if I were OpenAI, I'd be getting that message out because you know, from the outside, you're like, it's a pretty interesting business model. You got a company that's spending making capital commitments that's massively in excess of, you know, revenues.
And how do you do that and get, you know, it's it's degree of difficulty, I would say, is hard. Your perch on the boards of, let's call it these more traditional Fortune 500 type businesses and your conversations with those CEOs, how are they thinking about AI? Is it something that they're tipping into into with pilots?
Are they doing transformation initiatives? Do they think this doesn't really apply to us? We'll deal with it later. What what's your sense of how they're adopting or embracing AI? say every CEO in America today is like, how do I use AI? How does it apply to my business? How is it a threat? They got to find an internal champion.
They maybe have to recruit someone from the outside. I would say it's on the hierarchy of things they worry about, it's probably number one as both an opportunity and a threat. So, if you're not paying attention to it, you're you're I mean, your board is going to be, you know, asking you with first question every meeting about, you know, what how we dealing with the AI threat?
How we dealing with the AI opportunity? So, it's absolutely top of mind. Are you seeing much early success? I mean, through your, you know, again, through your visibility into these companies. I mean, there's a lot of mixed signals that we get like McKinsey did a study and said that 95% of enterprise initiatives actually fail.
Chamath, you've made this point around 80, 90, that a lot of these enterprises don't really know how to deploy AI. The the you know, the fanciest title in Silicon Valley these days is a forward deployed engineer, which is basically a like an IT consultant who can close the gap between the promise of AI and the ROI of it.
And I think people are just trying to figure out like how do we how do we use this thing? I mean, have you seen much actual success? Is this the Is this the question right now? Is this how do we bridge this gap? So, I haven't seen much success other than I mean, I'll give you the Pershing Square story.
You know, we're a tiny little company. How are we using AI today? The first use case is really on the legal side. Um [snorts] and you know, kind of almost almost you call it a compliance back office type you know, functionality. I think we're still super super early in terms of big companies using AI effectively.
Can I ask or test a thesis with you? You know, the the venture underwriting model where you think about people, you're underwriting a founder and their capacity to lead and redirect the organization in a changing environment. In technology environment, market environment and whatnot. And we have seen repeatedly similar success at scale if the company is still founder led where the founder feels like they have the authority to make all the radical decisions needed to make sure that that company persists and changes as needed in a changing environment.
Have you looked at founder led companies versus non-founder led companies where perhaps the founders really do have an inherent advantage in being able to navigate the changing environment and actually generate outsized returns over time? And I ask this particularly as it relates to the SaaS apocalypse and if you take a look at the companies that are founder led today versus not, if you're not founder led, you have an incentive to not make a mistake and get fired.
If you're founder led, you don't give a Your job is to make sure the company Yeah, I think the answer is exactly what you said. I think the problem is that the average life of an S&P 500 CEO is probably I don't know, 4 years or 3 or 3 and 1/2 years or something like this. And you're focused on, you know, kind of shorter term compensation.
You don't generally don't have a big economic stake in the business. You're a founder, this is your entire life. It's your entire reputation. It's not like you're going to go get another job. You got to kind of make it work. And also when you're in the board room, you have the authority of either being a major voting, you know, voice, or or a um you've got a huge economic stake in the company.
You know, when we join a board of a company, we're often the largest or the sec- the largest non-index fund type shareholder. That kind of gives us, you know, a little bit of a disproportionate voice in the boardroom. Imagine if you have that and you're CEO of the company, right? So, I think that does give you and and also if you've gotten to be a successful founder over time, uh guaranteed that you've made a number of very challenging call calls over time that turned out to be right, otherwise you wouldn't be there.
And so, you look at Mark Zuckerberg, right, when he bought, I don't know, Instagram, everyone's like shocked at the price paid or WhatsApp, you know, they seemed like, you know, sort of outside the you know, the company only had, whatever, 19 employees or something when he paid a billion something. Um but you make enough of those calls um and uh you can make the other challenging call.
antithetical to a Ben Graham investing model? Like, you have to have a different set of skills as an investor to to identify this talent versus Yeah, so I mean, Ben Graham is a really important voice for investors in that he said, "Look, you got to think about a business a stock certificate is an interest in a business as opposed to just this piece of paper." That's probably one of his most important kind of aphorisms.
But he was investing for the most part in liquidations. He was in that you know, in the days of Ben Graham where there weren't there's no Edgar system and nor to get a 10K filing, you had to go to the headquarters of the company. There were a lot of stocks trading at, you know, basically the cash on the balance sheet.
And his business model was, you know, buying these things at stupidly cheap prices and eventually Um but Ben Graham made most of his money investing in I don't know, Geico or something. Uh you know, not Tell us a little bit about you know, there's a sort of activist and significant shareholder, but then there's Howard Hughes, and you've talked a little bit about Berkshire Hathaway 2.0 or just being inspired by that Chamath you were inspired by for a long time.
Well, Bill Bill just took Pershing Square public. Yeah, but with with the Howard Hughes Corporation specifically, tell tell us about that effort cuz you're operating that business. There's a book uh I think it's called The Financial History of Berkshire Hathaway. That's for geeks. Um it basically this guy went back and read every 10-K whatever you actually went through the filings, looked at every deal that Buffett ever did, and you follow him over 60-year period of time.
And the vast majority of the value he created at Berkshire was through it actually the ownership of insurance operation. And what's interesting about insurance is that you know, running an insurance company you have two jobs. One is you you know, write business, right? You take risk. Um you collect premiums in exchange for the obligation to pay future claims.
And then you get that you get money up front, and your responsibility is to invest that money. Uh the vast majority of insurance companies focus only on the liability side of the balance sheet. Buffett was really the first to do focus on actually more on the asset side of the balance sheet than on the liability side.
And over time on the liability side, if you if you manage the assets of an insurance company well and the liabilities well, you can build this enormously profitable compounding tax-efficient machine over time. And the question is why haven't other people done this? And the answer is if you're really good at investing, you go work for a hedge fund, you go work for Fidelity, you go work for Wellington, but you don't go work for an insurance company.
So the insurance company's ability to recruit investment talent is very limited. Buffett owned half the company, he was really good at investing, which is why it worked. So what we're doing is we're you know, Buffett started with a crappy textile company. He effectively liquidated it over time, reinvested in insurance, and then invested the assets well.
Howard Hughes is actually really interesting company, but it's a business that Wall Street has not cared about for a long period of time. We created it out of the bankruptcy of of General Growth, it was a spin-off of all the other assets. And it's a company that owns these small cities. So I bet a lot of people here have heard of Summerlin because a lot of the tech community has moved from California to Las Vegas, but we own a this small city, 26,000 acres of land.
We own all the commercial land, we own all the residential land, we sell lots of home builders, we build a downtown, we build buildings. It's a bit like the Irvine company. You know, Don Bren created probably a hundred billion dollars of personal wealth managing a small city. It's a super cool company, but the time frame is decades as opposed to quarters.
So, Wall Street's never cared, it's always traded at a huge discount. So, Buffett bought into a textile business at a discount to liquidation value. At $63 a share, you're owning Howard Hughes at a discount to liquidation value. What we're doing is instead of reinvesting all the cash the business generates into real estate, we're going to reinvest all the cash into insurance.
We're going to next within the next week or so. You're in the business of building this flywheel. We're going to build this into a compounding machine over the next 50 years. It's something I've always wanted to do. We have the benefit of understanding both the insurance side of the business and we can manage the assets well.
You can buy it at, you know, whatever, 60 cents on the dollar. How do you think about investing the assets of this insurance company? So, So, what Buffett did is he took 100% of the insurance float and put the money in short-term treasuries. So, he took no risk on kind of policy holder funds. He took 100% of the surplus of the insurer, the equity, and invested in common stocks.
And that's what we're going to do. And I think we can build a really profitable insurance company. We're starting at a very small scale. The company's got like a four billion dollar market cap. And the goal is to build it into a trillion dollar thing over time. Compounding. The other thing Buffett did well is that he didn't issue any stock or not for a very long time.
So, they, you know, he started with a million shares and today is effectively like a million and a half. this is the future for very talented managers like yourself versus the traditional long short fund or do you think they sit side by side? I think it's hard to do this cuz you need control of a public company and you have to be not in a get-rich-quick mindset.
And there, if you're in the get-rich-quick, it's easy to go to Citadel and Millennium or one of these. Why does it have to be public? Why does it have to be public? It doesn't. It doesn't have to be public. Why did you choose to take it? Uh you know, we we got here by accident, right? So, the most successful equity investment we've ever made is we bought this company called General Growth.
We bought the stock of a company going bankrupt. Sort of the most contrarian investment you can make. Stock [snorts] went from, you know, uh $20 market cap to $100 million, and we bought a basically a uh a third of the company or 27% of the company at uh $200 million market cap, and there was $27 billion of debt.
And the bankruptcy emerged, and the strategy we said is, "Look, the assets are worth more than the liabilities. We're going to do the first uh restructuring where the equity gets to keep their investment in the company." Two years later, we emerged from Chapter 11. The stock went from $0.34 to $34. But, part of the restructuring was spinning off this thing called Howard Hughes.
It was really all of the junk that didn't belong in the company that the analysts hated. Um and so, we we did it uh with sort of an inverted investment. And you know, 15 years later, we haven't really created much value with it. So, we said, "Look, we've got to you know, the market doesn't like this thing.
The market A company has to earn a return in excess of its cost of capital in order for a stock to go up. And the you know, Elon's done an amazing job keeping the cost of capital of his companies really low. You know, if SpaceX goes public at a trillion $750 billion, it'll probably be the lowest cost of capital equity capital transaction in the history of the world.
The problem with this company, cuz it's real estate, cuz it's development, cuz it's land ownership, the market says, "The cost of capital is really high, and you can only earn a certain return on real estate." So, what we're doing is we're repurposing the real estate assets, and we're transforming the company into a much higher returning Well, the last few years, you've become incredibly famous.
I mean, just to kind of put a fine point on the word. How does that change and influence the way that markets work? Because like, you know, your voice gets amplified now. You also have other places where other voices get heard, many people's whose names you don't even know. You go into Wall Street bets and every random Tom, Dick, and Harry with an opinion.
Tell us the way the markets have changed with notoriety, fame, social media influence, not just yours, but in general. Yeah, I don't think markets have changed as a result of anything that's happened with me or follower growth on on Twitter. I think the Ryan Cohen guy, you know, the GameStop guy. Yeah.
You know, that is a change in markets when um you know, a stock can trade at a valuation well above the its value simply on the personality and the ability to Vibes. To gather up, you know, armies of followers. You know, the fascinating thing about liquidity and valuation is the higher a stock price goes and it's going to sound sort of intuitive, but it's not.
The more valuable the company becomes. You know, there's [snorts] actually the increase in value the company increases the value of the company, right? Because it lowers the cost of capital, it gives you more flexibility, gives you the ability to issue stock, raise capital, acquire other businesses.
And so, you know, getting back to the Elon example, uh it's really his I mean, I would say he's a better example of this. We've not taken advantage of this at all. Maybe we should. But he builds an army of believers and followers uh that enabled uh Tesla to be built. Um You know, the Let me maybe help Marcus.
And as we wrap up with a somewhat of a pointed question, you're an incredible investor. If there are people if we want to be maximally aligned with Bill Ackman, is the best way to be an LP in Pershing Square or is it best to go into the market and buy So, we have two I think there are three ways you can invest with us that are all different and a little cheap different things.
One is something I think called Pershing Square, which is the management company of Pershing Square. I think it's one of the most interesting, kind of intellectually, businesses because it's a uh it's the entity that receives fees on these three permanent capital vehicles we manage. So, it's a royalty on the compounding of investments in these entities.
And there's no CapEx in the business. So, we're going to pay out basically all of our profits and we're going to grow as quickly as the underlying assets uh compound. So, [snorts] if you invested a dollar in Pershing Square, you know, 22 years ago, that's that became um you know, uh 20 uh I think I should know this number.
It's like 27 or 28 times net of all fees. Wow. Okay. Over over 22 years. Had we charged the fees of this public vehicle, uh that number would have been um you know, uh 37 times. I'm sorry. No, more than something in the mid-40s. Okay. What this means is we now have a public vehicle that charges only a 2% fee.
We've got a one in London that charges an incentive fee. If we compound at the rates we have historically, we'll have 35 times the assets under management uh in 22 years. So, we'll go from 25 billion of assets to something approaching a trillion. We don't have to hire another person. Uh and we don't have to spend another dollar, if you will, on overhead.
That That's a pretty interesting business. So, I like that one. So, Pershing Square. You want to invest with us as an investor, invest in something called PSUS. And you own a portfolio of our best ideas and it's trading at an 18% discount to cash. You want to believe that we can build the next Berkshire Hathaway, you own Howard Hughes.
We've got three different ways. Yeah, I'll put some Howard Hughes. I think following you on Twitter and going the going direct movement does allow you to communicate directly your vision and and that actually makes it much easier to to place the bet. And so, I I do think it has a profound impact cuz prior to your extremely long tweets that have been parodied now, there's an incredible meme of a Bill Ackman tweet coming in, which is
you did that with your extended iPhone that's a foot tall. No, it was that was my Halloween costume. Yes. You would have written something shorter. You just didn't have the time, yeah? Yeah, I guess. I don't let other people read, you know, Do you do you do you like having a lawyer or anybody read it?
On the the Ronda tweet, which had some legal implications, I did have my communications guy and a lawyer. Yeah. A friend who's a lawyer read it, but I only gave him a few minutes cuz I was so excited. Once I write something I really like, I just want to I got to push it. Yes, I agree. I agree. And the torpedoes.
I Tom does this, too. He starts getting a little bit frantic when he's writing something and then he's like, "Fuck it." He just hits send. I just hit send. By the way, it's a very powerful thing to be able to share your view and push a button and reach 2.2 million people. So, I'll I'll I'll have to Why don't we just take a picture on stage and I'll send it out.
Let's do it. Let's do it. Let's do it. Let's do it. Liquidate it. Gone all in? All right. Relax. Thank you.
Comments 0