저자: BrandonIvey · 외국인
요약 보기
2017년 8월 기준 비트코인은 약 3,346달러. 진행자는 RT의 Max Keiser와 Peter Schiff의 논쟁 영상을 소개하며 Schiff의 비트코인 부정론을 반박함. Schiff 주장: 비트코인은 디지털 법정화폐이며 신뢰(faith)에 기반할 뿐 실질 가치가 없고, 사람들이 받아주지 않으면 쓸모가 없다고 봄. 시장 신호는 틀렸다고 주장. Keiser 반박: 밀레니얼 세대는 비트코인을 디지털 금으로 여기며, 구글·아마존 등 닷컴버블 이후에도 살아남은 기업처럼 블록체인 응용은 실재함. 진행자 의견: Schiff의 논리는 일관성이 없고(달러도 1970년대 이후 금 태환이 없음), 비트코인은 투기자산으로 쓰이고 있으며 아직 초기 단계라 가치가 없다는 주장은 근거가 약하다고 봄. 다만 비트코인이 마이스페이스처럼 더 나은 대체재에 밀릴 위험은 인정. 출연자 전망: Schiff는 비트코인이 결국 무가치해질 것이라 봄. Keiser는 비트코인이 디지털 금 역할을 할 것이라 봄. 진행자는 Schiff가 금 옹호자로서 이해관계가 있다고 비판하며 비트코인 상승 쪽에 우호적임.
다듬은 글
welcome back this is Bitcoin Brendan with some more news this is from Bitcoin calm as of this recording the price of Bitcoin is three thousand three hundred and forty six dollars amazing now this is an interesting one most of the articles that I have been covering has been positive on cryptocurrency here is one that is negatives let's see what this guy Peter Schiff has to say about cryptocurrency he thinks the market market signals are wrong after this what do you think now this week the media outlet RT published a new Caza report from the Freedom Fest 2017 conference in Las Vegas with host Max Keiser during the report kind of talks with The Economist and longtime gold-bug Peter Schiff about the decentralized currency Bitcoin shift says he understands that people want an alternative to the current monetary system but believes an alternative to Fiat will not be cryptocurrency or what he calls digital Fiat Bitcoin is just a form of digital fiat based on faith that's an interesting take on it Peter Schiff - the well-known economist precious metals proponent and a person who doesn't like cryptocurrencies at all Max Keiser should discuss the global economy Trump and the Federal Reserve with shift at the Freedom Fest event held in Las Vegas last month then the to further delve into a conversation about the rise of Bitcoin and Schiff gives great detail into why he doesn't favor this technology believes Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are million representations of digital fiat ok that's an interesting take on it our monetary system is based on state because there is nothing real behind dollars or Euros and it's just based on the fact that you believe people are going to want it explained other than that the other thing currencies have is that governments accept it or require it for payment of taxes so if you live in America the IRS wants your taxes and you better send them dollars that's what they accept there and there is a natural man $4 to stay out of jail Bitcoin is the same concept it's being created but there is no real value in Bitcoin it's all based on faith if somebody doesn't want your Bitcoin there's nothing you can do with it right I do not agree with this statement here he says bitcoin is the same concept it's being created okay it's being created I guess you could say that's the same as monetary being created the difference is there's a limit to what can be created you just can't create Bitcoin out of thin air whereas the federal government whenever they want to just can't create more dollars that's a huge different difference if somebody doesn't want your Bitcoin there's nothing you can do with it that's correct if send with US dollars if somebody decides we're not taking dollars anymore like they did in the 20s there's nothing you can do about it is based on faith so his assertion is that people aren't going to want Bitcoin let's let's keep going here people hold bitcoin is a speculative asset of course Max Keiser a longtime crypto currency advocate disagrees with and says that a lot of Millennials believe bitcoin is a form of digital gold cartel as a business person he should be on board with this trend or otherwise he's ignoring an entire market I agree with Kaiser they are wrong shift tells Kaiser ok here's my problem again he says up here is based on state somebody doesn't want your Bitcoin where is obvious that the Millennials want the Bitcoin so all he says is that is they are wrong the people that are using it bitcoins are using it as a speculative asset I talked to a guy today who showed me his cryptocurrency portfolio and he had like fifty thousand dollars I asked him have you ever spent any he said no and he's never used it in commerce he's speculating on it and he owns it as an asset ok how is that bad well the last of myself who owned a bunch of gold walk into a store and try to buy you know about the fruit lake or frosty frosty flakes with gold it is an asset it's not even a currency Kaiser counters shifts argument with the fact that God just said it gold bugs don't spend their precious metals either and they hold it as a speculative asset if anything this guy's argument he is making the case for cryptocurrency further Kaiser says a lot of these gold bugs pay storage fees just to store gold in a secure location look Bitcoin is never going to be used as money Schiff tells Kaiser people can buy it and the price can go up into the price collapses and people don't want it anymore okay he's assuming people aren't going to want it but why would people want it that's the real question you should be asking themselves people who are buying you think that one day bitcoin is going to be a currency that everyone uses it's going to be worth a million dollars a Bitcoin it's impossible first of all there's already a thousand of the crypto currencies and how many more can there be merchants don't accept it they get paid in dollars no merchants are pricing products in Bitcoin what are they talking about bitcoin is in its infancy stage right now it's like a company that offers stock options it's worth nothing right now people don't buy groceries with stock they transfer it into dollars same with cryptocurrency now he says market signals are wrong Schiff doesn't believe in the market signals Kaiser describes the Economist explains that the market was giving signals during the dot-com bubble and other types of stocks however Kaiser says that even though the dot-com bubble burst Google and Amazon still rule the world and guess what Amazon and Google and Facebook are all taking advantage of the blockchain and Bitcoin real world application is this guy just going to ignore all of that Amazon is one there are hundreds that went to zero station so how do you know I don't know how do we know what if somebody comes up with a digital currency a year or two from now that is so much better than Bitcoin if everything Bitcoin does better faster and cheaper everyone then once said new one and nobody wants Bitcoin it's worthless well I mean in that argument you can look at it like this everybody had myspace I've ever had over a hundred million mark that Facebook came along and made it better I kind of look at Bitcoin as the myspace aetherium as the Facebook but it ain't Bitcoin ain't going anywhere and he believed is going to be worthless nobody wants it anymore because somebody came up with a better mousetrap a mousetrap of course I don't think that's going to happen because I don't think any of them will work really if we are ever going to have digital currency they will have to be backed by gold they're not backed by wait a minute wait a minute he talks about the US dollar which hasn't been backed by gold since the 70s and he uses that argument to say that cryptocurrency needs to be backed by gold Kaiser believes bitcoin has a lot of similarities with a very precious metals that advocates for on his show and at conferences still shift to this day will not accept Bitcoin as a form of payment and thinks it will never be widely adopted obviously he has a travel and a left American shores go to Asia go to Japan China Vietnam South Korea the Philippines next go to Russia go to India go to Ukraine I just added 150 Bitcoin ATMs this guy's living in a bubble sure there is digital scarcity there is 20 million 1 million bitcoins but if nobody wants them they are worthless shift ads what do you think about Peter shifts opinion regarding Bitcoin and crypto currencies I think he's a joke I think he's a hater I think he's going to say whatever he can to try to downplay Bitcoin no matter the evidence placed and front of him and I think his real reason for doing so is that he has been you know advocating gold and cryptocurrency can be seen as an asset light gold and as of today is worth three times the amount of gold that's why I think his real reasoning is behind his hate on cryptocurrency anyways what do you think do you think he's right do you think he's wrong leave me a comment give me a thumbs up Bitcoin Brandon out you
Comments 0