저자: 찰리멍거 · 외국인
요약 보기
멍거는 암호화폐는 쓸모없고 해롭다며 강하게 반대한다. 그는 암호화폐를 사는 것은 '엄청나게 멍청한' 일이며, 반대 논리가 없다고 주장한다. 국가 통화가 인류 문명 발전에 기여한 점을 들어 이를 대체하려는 시도를 비판한다. 중국이 암호화폐를 금지한 것을 올바른 결정이라고 칭찬하며, 미국 정부가 허용한 것을 부끄럽게 여긴다고 밝힌다. 사회 안전망 규모처럼 합리적 이견이 있는 문제와 달리 암호화폐는 명백히 잘못된 것이라 대응 논리가 필요 없다고 말한다. 슈퍼볼 등 소액 도박은 큰 해가 없다고 보며, 암호화폐와 같은 고배당 도박과는 구분한다.
다듬은 글
but that leads me to this question about crypto that uh Benjamin writes in he says in 2007 at the USC Law School Charlie said I'm not entitled to have an opinion on this subject unless I can State the arguments against my position better than the people who are supporting it the question is does this also apply to your Wall Street Journal article on Banning cryptocurrencies and if yes would you care to share the arguments against your position well I I uh I don't think there are good arguments against my position I think the people that oppose my position are idiots and and and so I don't think there is a rational argument against my Poss this is an incredible thing naturally people like to run gambling conino where other people lose and the people who invented this crypto crap which is my name for it and sometimes I call it crypto crao and sometimes I call it well crypto sh and it's just ridiculous that anybody would buy this stuff and it isn't you can think of hardly nothing on Earth that has done more good to the human race than currency National currencies they were absolutely required to turn man from a goddamn successful ape and have model modern successful humans in human civilization because it enabled all these convenient exchanges so if somebody says I'm going to create something that sort of replaces the national currency it's like saying I'm going to replace the National Air you know it's it's as an i it is it isn't even slightly stupid it's massively stupid and and of course it's very dangerous and of course the governments were totally wrong to permit it and of course I'm not proud of my country for allowing this crap what I call the crypto to it's worthless it's no good it's crazy it'll do nothing but harm it's antisocial to allow it and the guy who made the correct decision on this is the Chinese leader the Chinese leader took one look at crypto he says not in my China and boom oh there isn't any crypto in China he's right and we're wrong and there is no good argument on the other side I can't can't Supply it so does that counter what you said back at USC that you shouldn't have a position unless you coun counter I I do think you ought to be able you ought to be able to State a lot of issues you ought to be how big should the social safety net be that's a place where reasonable Minds can disagree and you should be able to State the case on the other side about as well as the case you believe in but when you're dealing with something as awful as crypto sh you're you uh it's just unspeakable it's it's an absolute horror and and H I'm ashamed of my country that so many people believe in this kind crap and the government allows it to exist it is totally absolutely crazy stupid gambling with enormous house odds for the people on the other side and they cheat in addition to cheating in the betting and it's just crazy so that is something there's only one correct answer for intelligent people there just just totally avoid it and avoid all the people that are promoting it how do you feel about the gambling that took place at the Super Bowl and surrounding that and the legalized gambling taking place in this country at this point well it's not as bad as crypto I I I I don't think there's much harm in betting a modest amount you can afford on a supermarket bowl game that that strikes me as pretty you know if you do it with a friend and not with a bookie and so I I don't I don't have the same feeling I obviously don't think you should have a gambling compulsing to run around betting against odds if you take all the money that I have bet against odds in my whole life I don't think it's more than a few thousand dollar
Comments 0