원문 보기
It's a global monetary system, so first, digital, private, no government oversight, rules-based, critically important, mathematically metered to stop at 21 million units, guaranteeing longer-term purchasing power and wealth creation in a way that fiat currencies do not. Um and then the third is that it is a new asset class.
It's It's really the first in a new asset class, and we think it will be the biggest because those are three very very big ideas, very big ideas. And we're in print saying base case mid 700,000, bull case 1.5, but When when what? Well, we were saying 2030. Now, that absolutely could happen, especially if institutions move in in a big way.
And tokenization as a concept is introducing more and more institutions Cathie Wood is still bullish on Bitcoin, but she isn't describing a straight line up. In this interview, she says Bitcoin had fallen about 50% during the latest crypto winter versus 75 to 95% in earlier winters. She points to three pressures.
A Binance software glitch tied to auto delivery fears about quantum computing, and miners redirecting power toward AI data centers. Those are very different risks. One is a market structure shock, one is a long horizon security question, and one is competition for energy and infrastructure. Wood's view is that the sell-off may be bottoming.
That's her read at the time of the interview, not a confirmed floor. The bigger question is whether her long-term thesis can outweigh each near-term challenge. She frames Bitcoin as internet-native money, a globally accessible monetary network with a hard 21 million supply cap, and a new asset class.
Then she attaches a striking 2030 forecast, but ties it to institutional adoption and tokenization. We'll hear the forecast in her own words. After that, we'll test the assumptions against the other crypto assets she favors and the throughput problem she says still needs solving. With Bitcoin? Yes. Still bullish?
Still bullish. So, in the last almost year, we've gone through another crypto winter. And but we've gone down, at least when it comes to Bitcoin, 50%. The previous crypto winters went down Bitcoin went down 75 to 95%. Some progress? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. But the the reason that we have had this winter is first, something called the flash crash in October, October 10th of last year, when Binance, there was a software glitch and something called auto deleveraging happened, where if a hedge fund or a DeFi company was operating in two exchanges, one where he or she had the long and the other where he or she had the short, sort of to be perfectly hedged, what happened during auto deleveraging is on Binance, the software glitch caused an auto deleveraging.
So, they were they ended up being completely offsides. And I think it cost, it depends, there are range of estimates from 15 to 30 billion dollars in damage. A lot of people just wiped out. So, that was the first thing. The second was quantum computing. Quantum computing, many people think that the juiciest target out there is Bitcoin.
And the reason it is, it's cryptographic and Satoshi's coins are there. We don't know if Satoshi is is a group or a person, but that group or person has not moved those coins since inception. So, they're kind of sitting ducks. They haven't moved their wallets and to more quantum resistant. And of course, there are a lot of lost Bitcoin out there.
So, big juicy target. The more work we do on quantum though, it's going to take years and years and years. Now, AI research is accelerating progress, but not by that much. Um just to give you uh a sense, they're they're working right now with 100 cubits at a time. That's the max. We need hundreds of thousands of cubits to crack the code, so to speak.
It's not going to happen for a long time. And then the third thing that happened was AI. AI was taking all of the oxygen out of the room, and Bitcoin miners were leading the way. They were shifting from mining Bitcoin to facilitating data centers with their power, right? Uh so, those three things happened over the last year.
I think we're bottoming out. We've gone from 60,000 a little below that to 80, roughly. We still think that Bitcoin is three revolutions in one. The first is it introduced technology native to the internet and a currency native to the internet, which we did not have. And why didn't we have it before?
We didn't have it because in the early '90s, when uh the uh developers of the internet were again coding, no one knew that financial services and commerce would take place on the internet. So, there was no layer built in to facilitate it. Uh now there is. That technology revolution, Pause on the word bottoming.
Wood says Bitcoin had rebounded to roughly $80,000 after trading a little below $60,000 in the interview's market context. That observation is not proof that a durable low is in. A price rebound can coexist with leverage damage, shifting minor economics, and unresolved security questions. Her three explanations also operate on very different timelines.
The Binance auto deleveraging episode she describes is a market structure shock. The quantum computing concern is a long-range protocol security debate, not evidence in this interview that Bitcoin's cryptography is about to fail. And miners moving power or infrastructure toward AI data centers raises a question about where energy and capital earn their best return.
Don't collapse those into one simple explanation for price. Now, listen for the assumptions behind the upside number. Wood's thesis depends on Bitcoin gaining institutional adoption, while stablecoins may be a more practical first step for people who can't tolerate Bitcoin's volatility. She also names Ethereum, Solana, Solana, and hyperliquid, hyperliquid, as other major ecosystems, then points to a scale challenge for automated payments.
That's where the long-term opportunity meets an engineering constraint. It's a global monetary system, so first digital private, no government oversight, rules-based, critically important, mathematically metered to stop at 21 million units, guaranteeing longer-term purchasing power and wealth creation in a way that fiat currencies do not.
Um, and then the third is that it is a new asset class. It's It's really the first in a new asset class, and we think it will be the biggest because those are three very big ideas, very big ideas. And we're in print saying base case mid 700,000, bull case 1.5, but When When by? Well, we were saying 2030.
Now, that absolutely could happen, especially if institutions move in in a big way. And tokenization as a concept is introducing more and more institutions to decentralized finance. The one thing that has taken a little bit of luster from Bitcoin in terms of fundamentals are stable coins. And yet, if you're a Bitcoin OG, you have that here.
OG? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay, good. Good. First time I ever heard that, by the way, was uh when I was doing a podcast, uh Tasha and I were doing a podcast with Elon Musk, and he used the word OG, and I looked at Tasha, "What's that?" So, I'm expert now. Anyway. So, even the Bitcoin OGs are saying, "Okay, we get stable coins because in emerging markets, they're living hand to mouth.
Uh they're so worried about their currencies destroying their purchasing power, destroying their wealth. They can't afford the volatility of Bitcoin. So, this is an interim step. But, they say over time, these people will recognize that Bitcoin is better than the dollar, which is what backs stable coins for the most part.
Uh so, they will build their wealth with uh with Bitcoin. So, it's interesting. We've spoken a lot about Bitcoin there and stable coins. What about the rest of the crypto ecosystem? Do you have a view on, you know, Ethereum and and the other coins? Uh we do. We We think the big four are Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and Hyperliquid.
And what goes on during a bear market is the builders really build, and we're watching what they're building and watching the ecosystems adjust one to the other and, you know, become more more specialized. Uh so, Hyperliquid uh is all about perps, perpetual futures. Now, Solana also has high-throughput financial transactions.
Ethereum is smart contracts of all kinds. Think it's going to be really important to a agentic commerce. But, as we learn from companies like Cloudflare, Cloudflare is saying, "In order to accommodate uh agentic commerce, a dent- payments, we are going to need a an ecosystem, a blockchain that is enables 20 to 100 million transactions per second.
So, that that's micro transactions as agents talk to each other and do deals with each other in micro, you know, micro denominations, right? So, 1/1000, 1/1000000 of a dollar, that that sort of thing. Uh so, Cloudflare Matthew Prince CEO is saying, "We need 20 to 100 million." Well, uh what we're seeing is if Visa, a traditional payments ecosystem, 20,000 payments per second.
Mhm. Think about that. He's saying 20 million to 100 million. Ethereum and Solana very slow throughput. I'm an advisor on a blockchain called Layer Zero, and they're aiming for 2 million and then upping that as uh as time goes on. So, we're watching the payment space, uh agentic payments, agentic commerce, to give us some direction here how quickly it's going to evolve and scale and so forth.
And I think that's going to be very important to, well, especially Ethereum, uh see if it can deal with that kind of volume. It can't now. Here's the clean takeaway. Wood's upside case depends on adoption, not just scarcity. Her mid $700,000 base case and $1.5 million bold case are framed around 2030 with institutional participation and tokenization as possible catalysts.
The interview also surfaces real friction. Leverage events can hit a fragile market. Stablecoins may better serve people who can't stomach Bitcoin's volatility, and blockchains face a major scaling test if machine-driven payments accelerate. None of that confirms her targets. It gives you a checklist to track: institutional activity, developer progress, minor economics, and whether networks can raise throughput while preserving their security assumptions.
If you want more source-led crypto analysis, subscribe and tell us which of Wood's four crypto names deserves the closest scrutiny next. This is analysis, not personal investment advice.
Comments 0