"Bitcoin ist eine Blase, ohne Wert & kopierbar" - Reaktion auf @Peter Schiff 🤓

요약 보기

결론: 비트코인은 거품이라는 Peter Schiff 주장에 반박하며, 거품은 일시적 과열일 뿐 가치가 없다는 뜻은 아니라는 입장. 거품 개념: 거품은 가격이 기초가치보다 단기적으로(때로는 장기적으로도) 크게 높은 상태이며, 2014년·2017년·2021년 초 등 과거에도 반복됨. 거품 붕괴 후에도 비트코인 가격은 이전 고점보다 높아졌다는 점을 근거로 듦. 가치 논쟁: 가치의 핵심은 실사용 효용이라고 봄. 베네수엘라(2018년 1유로=69볼리바르 → 2021년 470만 볼리바르, 약 99.8% 평가절하), 쿠바 화폐개혁, 엘살바도르 사례를 들어 비트코인이 가치저장·자본도피 수단으로 쓰인다고 주장. 복제 가능성 반박: 비트코인 코드는 오픈소스라 복제 가능하지만 네트워크(사용자·참여 노드)는 복제할 수 없다고 봄. 위키피디아 예시로 콘텐츠 복사와 네트워크 가치 차이를 설명. 거래 속도 비판: 일부 동의하나 비트코인의 주된 기능은 결제가 아닌 가치저장이라고 반박. 거래 속도가 빨라지지 않는다는 Schiff 지적은 기능 측면에서 무관하다는 입장. 전망: 개별 자산의 1~3개월 가격 방향에 대한 구체적 예측이나 목표가는 언급되지 않음. 장기적 가치 저장 수단으로서의 긍정적 견해만 제시. 리스크: 거품 붕괴 가능성은 인정하나 장기 상승 추세를 전제로 함. 출연자 전망은 장기 긍정.

다듬은 글

※ 자동 자막 원문(다듬기 전)

01. The highlight of today's mini-video is several sections by Peter Schäfer and Peter Schiff, who you might not know yet. He's similar to Dirk Müller in America, meaning he's primarily known as a crisis prophet, writing books, managing himself, and for his, let's say, very strong and polarizing opinions.

02. I personally have read two of his books and generally think quite highly of him. Aside from his opinion on the subject of crèche products, you can see the same thing. Back then, I first heard about him; the price was still under 10 euros. However, he never bought it and has since reported exclusively negatively about it.

03. Both were, of course, American. The whole thing is in English for four years. I also have the German subtitles, but this is him . So, his credits, abridged version. The first image can only be a bubble, and secondly, that both Bitcoin and all other clips have no real value. Let's look at how Always start at the beginning.

04. Bitcoin is just a bubble. Now, what exactly does he mean by such a bubble? Glass is basically just shorthand for a speculative bubble, and that's what we're always talking about when the price is significantly higher than the underlying value, either in the short term or sometimes even in the long term.

05. What happens? Eventually, people realize it. Well, and Minister Press's card is way too high. The first one sells, then the second, and suddenly everyone sells, and the price crashes. He can see the picture. Such bubbles exist; we've seen this several times in the past, in 2014, in 2017, or even at the beginning of this year.

06. What Peter Schiff is really saying now, however, is that the entire Cologne dig is a bubble, and that means that at some point this entire Bitkom bubble could burst, according to him, and then the price will go to zero. Well, I personally see things a bit differently. I do n't assume that Becker himself is a bubble, but rather that it's a cycle that, among other things, also creates a bubble.

07. This can include what they both have always done in their Berlin past. The special thing about Bild Cologne now, however, is that after each bubble burst, the value or price was higher than the price before the bubble. This means that despite these bubbles, it has always risen. This also means that such bubbles are not inherently bad; they are not entirely natural price corrections, especially when dealing with a market where there are many emotional investors who are somewhat distressed or treated in an extreme way.

08. The proof of this is provided, for example, by the infamous dot-com bubble of the 90s. Back then, for example, one stock was worth a whole 100 dollars. Then the bubble burst, and instead of 100, it was only five dollars. So, a price dropped by a whole 95 percent. Does this mean that Amazon is a bubble, that the asset classes themselves are in a bubble?

09. No, it only means that the price was significantly higher in the short term than the underlying value. will be and he was corrected, no more but also no less, and only to his second point, the video image of Cologne, other creative and the real value, well, what we first need to clarify is what actually determines the value of the nativity scene.

10. I would say the primary value is the benefit, therefore for the people who use the whole thing. Well, that would then mean that Peter Schiff indirectly says that neither Bitcoin nor anything else has the real benefit of warming the forces. And now, without going into detail about him back then, let's just look around us at what's currently happening in the world, starting with Venezuela.

11. In 2018, for example, 1 euro was worth 69 Venezuelan bolivars. In 2021, just three years later, one euro was worth 4.7 million Venezuelan bolivars. That 's a value of a whopping 99.8 percent. Yes, that's what it looks like when you get hyperinflation. So what do the people on the ground do? They use Bitcoin as a store of value, which is no longer You can rely on the local currency, and well, physical gold and silver simply aren't available for everyone, but a mobile phone with internet connections is something everyone has.

12. Okay, everyone knows that's a bit of an exaggeration, but I think you know what I mean. Let's also look at, say, Cuba, because at the beginning of next year, for example, the communist government stole 96 percent of the local currency of the so-called currency reform nation. So what do the local citizens do who no longer want to use their local currency?

13. Well, they switch to Bitcoin, use it as a store of value, and also use it, among other things, to actually leave the country, to be able to escape. Yes, and then maybe we can also talk about El Salvador, where I am currently located. What do they offer here? Without going into detail, it turns the entire country upside down in the most positive sense you can imagine.

14. So tell anyone from Cuba, Venezuela, or here in El Salvador... Salvador, the idea that Bitcoin somehow has no value, they would absolutely give the finger to that, and that in turn means that anyone who even has the Dibt Cologne has no real use for it. Well, we haven't had any judges yet, so we haven't done anything about which properties, what use, what supposed effect it can have on people, or secondly, not that much has come out yet and I really don't know what kind of misery actually exists somewhere in the country.

15. Let's move on to the second section in the individual team Herbert Oetting of the summer from Come Up with Another Car. His criticism in short is that you could simply copy the currency with Cologne and the nativity scene, and secondly, that Bitcoin is even rather worse compared to other currencies, especially when it comes to transaction speed, but they all have no value anyway.

16. Let's start with the first point that you can simply copy it, because that's where the question arises as to what exactly is meant, because basically the head of Bitcoin is open source and that in turn means that you can now simply go on the internet and you can see the complete Kocin and Theoretically, you could copy it completely, but what you ca n't copy is the network of acquaintances.

17. Let's look at two different examples. Example number 1: Let's assume a hacker bit me and wants to... What are the chances of actually getting into Facebook and stealing my entire body and Facebook? Do you still have your own website? Let's not call it Facebook, but let's say... Let's put pressure on...

18. So, does the book actually have a tangible value of one trillion? Probably not, but why not? Well, there are around three billion users. All the Edwards are eager for it. That means you can copy the code, but not the network. Or, second example in the study: There's software online that lets you easily copy entire websites.

19. That means what Lewis, for example, could do: You research the largest web server online, Wikipedia, currently with 18 billion hits per month, and you could copy the entire Wikipedia. But would that mean you also get 18 hits? Probably not. Why not? Well, first... The approximately 27 million active users who voluntarily add around 20,000 articles to Wikipedia every month, even if they naturally have all the links that all link back to the original page, meaning that even with Wikipedia you can copy the code, the entire website, but not that you will now become and the same is also a model, not transferable.

20. Kuby was about networks, now to his second point that even some icons can be present as images when it comes to transaction speeds. Well, I partially agree with you there, at least if we actually refer to the Bitkom blog chain, but quite honestly, that's not Bitkom's primary function, because that lies in storing values, i.e., serving as a value store, and in that function, no other is affected, but it only affects it in a very limited way.

21. Not even all the hard-core folks and with a fireplace, for example, Bitkom Nikon satirical knowledge, not even in a very limited way. Good if we now also consider that you give the suffering in the network to Bitkom, so the numbers will be, can even So, the instance is, it doesn't go any faster if you were here in Elster and bought something in the store, that's it, it's faster than a cash payment, that means what Peter Schiffen is doing at that point, is that vanilla with chocolates, it was the same and then came to the conclusion that chocolate is somehow more chocolatey, somehow not really, and speaking of chocolates, Mainz is already waiting and me as afterwards, if you want to see more videos about the topic of bit Cologne or are a secretary, then it was really cool, if you support the channel, it's quite nice, because the first scenes, no one subscribed to his leader, and thirdly, if you have any questions or specific video manager, feel free to suggest them below in the comments so that she can see them for next time and profession, so again this year, mask.