저자: IndependentMind진행자 · 외국인
요약 보기
결론: 영상 주장은 비트코인을 법정화폐 체제 해체의 도구로 옹호하며, 가격 전망은 제시하지 않음. 발표자는 피터 쉬프의 비트코인 비판에 반대하며, 쉬프가 법정화폐 체제에는 40년간 비판해 왔지만 비트코인에는 일관되지 않게 반대한다고 주장함. 위기 시점에 대한 견해: 쉬프는 위기가 미래에 올 것이라고 보지만, 발표자는 위기는 지금도 계속 겪고 있는 것이며 시스템은 그대로 굴러간다고 봄. 비트코인의 가치와 역할: 발표자는 과거 10년간 비트코인이 화폐와 국가를 분리하는 논의에서 어떤 책보다 큰 역할을 했다고 주장하며, 비트코인이 0이 되더라도 상관없다고 말함. 금의 가치 논쟁: 쉬프는 금 가치의 원천을 장신구·치과 등 실사용자에 두지만, 발표자는 이를 반박함. 다만 이 논리를 받아들인다면 이더리움을 지지해야 한다고 주장. 탈중앙 VPN과 이더리움: 발표자는 중앙화된 VPN 기업의 프라이버시 위험을 지적하며, 탈중앙 VPN 구동을 위한 가스 역할로 이더리움을 제시함. 부채 지속가능성: 쉬프는 GDP 대비 부채 비율에 따른 붕괴를 주장하지만, 발표자는 개인이 시스템 참여를 중단할 자유가 없다면 붕괴 지점은 없다고 반박함. 이 영상에서는 대상 자산에 대한 1~3개월 가격 방향 예측이나 종목별 매수·매도 언급은 확인되지 않음.
다듬은 글
so today's video i'm going to dedicate to peter schiff and i want to share my thoughts on his objection to the bitcoin standard or crypto in general and obviously i couldn't disagree more and i think that peter is unique in the sense that he is one of us uh most of us agree with everything that peter has to say everything except one and for full disclosure i follow his youtube channels and i also have money invested with him through the euro pacific management i have a separated something account so you know i agree with peter on many many issues in today's video i'm going to dedicate to the things that i disagree with him and the first thing that i am going to refer to is the fact that for peter the crisis is somewhere in the future in peter's mind there is a point of reckoning and i obviously think see things very differently in fact i find it very strange that peter who saw his father died handcuffed into a to a bed thinks that the crisis is in front of us and i would make the argument that the crisis is something we experience every day it is never ending and there is no point of reckoning there there are points of higher stress but in the end the system moves on and people continue to live under that system so peter was introduced to bitcoin when he was about ten dollars and today trades at around 37 000 peter has been criticizing bitcoin throughout that period in fact i am sure that even if bitcoin reaches a million dollars and the market cap of the bitcoin system is going to be uh greater than gold peter would still be criticizing it i ridiculed that uh you know that way of thinking and yet when he makes the same argument with fiat i completely agree with him and why is that you see in 1971 nixon took us off the gold standard and peter has been criticizing that fact ever since and both peter and i think this is a system that is waiting to burst or it's a bubble waiting to pop and why is it that i agree with him in the fiat system and he's been doing it for 40 years and i think it is ridiculous when it comes to bitcoin and the answer is very simple and it goes back to the first point i was making where peter believes that the crisis is somewhere in the future you see the reason i am against the fiat system is not because what it is going to do but rather what it does how it influenced our everyday life and how much suffering it creates today now i'm not against the fiat system because i think it is great and it's some time going to burst i think it's an awful system you know by the way i don't know why but peter always criticizes uh the use of government and uh the federal reserve system when it comes to distorting our reality and really talks about everything except one thing which which is the industrial military complex i've i've heard hundreds of hours of him speaking not once have you spoken about the fact that these pieces of paper are used to finance many many wars in our world many words that many of us are believed that are unjustified and for some reason he doesn't speak about that but that is also a reason why i'm against the fiat system i'm against people individuals having ultimate power over the entire population if no man should have that power power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely going back to bitcoin for the past 10 years this asset has done more in the issue of separating money from state that any book or books that were ever written if you take all the books that peter wrote and his father wrote and hayek wrote and walter williams and uh thomas uh seoul and ingersoll and all of these people they have done absolutely nothing com in compared to bitcoin when it comes to the conversation of separating money from state in the last 11 years there have been thousands of conferences some of them had thousands and thousands of people attending where the main issue the main subject is separating money from state if you told me that bitcoin is going to zero tomorrow and whether or not i am regretful for investing a one month salary into the crypto market at one point i wouldn't mind i wouldn't care at all it wouldn't change anything my motivation is to spread the word of individual powers or individual freedoms and any way any technology that can help us towards that i am for it and if this goes to zero eric borges and i are not going to look at each other thinking oh well we were wrong so we're going to do with gold no we're going to come up with a different software that is we're going to learn from whatever mistake might have been with bitcoin and we are going to evolve but the genie is out of the box i mean we people individual are going to interact peer-to-peer whether peter likes it or believes it whether the central banks believe it or not that is the most intriguing that's what i like about the crypto market there is no responsible adult it is free and voluntary cooperation billions of dollars of transferring hands every day no regulations there are hundreds of thousands of people who work at regulating agencies in the united states claiming that they are the reason that markets are functioning they are the reason people have a place to work and yet this is not this is a reality if you look at corn market cap or any other website that shows you that market i don't know what you're thinking and looking at it but this is a market that is 27 for i'm sorry 7 24 7.
it is always on people are transacting no agencies no central power and it is happening whether you like to or you don't like to and i cannot say which product which project is going to make it but the idea that individuals will not be able to use software to interact between between themselves peer to peer is just ridiculous to me the genie is out of the bottle so another issue i disagree with peter is that according to him what gives gold its value is the people who use gold and it should be said that less than five percent of the gold market is used the other 95 are used by people to store their value and the idea that if people didn't want to wear jewelry or dentistry would find other materials to use then the 90 the other 95 percent of the people would lose the entire value of their holdings because what gave it in the first place its value is the five percent who use that that is um a ridiculous statement i couldn't disagree with more but let's say i disagree let's say i agreed with it let's say that i would i believe that that's what gives gold its value if that is the case then ethereum would be a project that i would expect peter to support peter in his show the youtube show he has advertises a vpn service for those who don't know a vpn is a virtual private network and it's basically a computer that is owned by a company and all your information is sent to that server and from there it is sent on so if you aren't aware your isp or internet service provider is tracking every move you have on the web if you go to a porno site and you wish to see a video you need to tell your isp i'd like to see that uh blonde girl and uh after two minutes you might say listen i want to see uh that the big woman whatever and every time you do that you're asking your isp to do it so someone has this information and if your prime minister wants to know how long it takes you to come he can figure this one out those who wish to maintain their privacy use a virtual private network so their information that is sent to the isp is always the same send me to that server however it should be obvious to you that the vpn itself is also a business and though some of them claim they don't have access to your information still it is a private company people are corrupted and so i think that any one of us should have value or consider or believe that there is value in a vpn that is not run by a single uh company a vpn that is decentralized also it should be obvious to you that since it's decentralized it cannot have a kyc or a aml and therefore fiat money cannot be used we need to have a currency that is digital and it is that centralized and ethereum is gasoline it is a gas for people to run application that would allow a vpn so if you uh believe in peter that the five percent that use gold give its value you should be an enthusiast about ethereum the final point i would be making is regarding peter schiff claim of the system's unsustainability for peter there is some ratio between gdp and the country's debt that is simply going to collapse the system supposedly and if you've seen the movie 1984 by george orwell my question to you this is a movie where the government controls everything and my question to peter was for is uh in that movie what was the uh interest rates uh the 30-year bond interest rates what was the gdp to debt ratio and the answer to this question is obviously whatever the government says what peter doesn't understand i think is that if you're willing to sacrifice freedom if you willing to sacrifice an individual rights to choose then there is no gdp to that ratio which is unsustainable there is no point in which the system collapses if people are not allowed to stop participating in that system and obviously i think that bitcoin contributes a lot to that fight and whether it succeeds or not i'm not sure but as i've said we are going to interact peer-to-peer and this can be done only through a digital asset which is scarce and decentralized so i'll end this video by saying thank you um thank you peter for spreading the gospel and talking about the united states constitution and advocating for individual rights and i hope that the arguments i've made here would find you and i think they're different than those that eric voorhees eloquently uh presented to you and yeah i hope to see you in the battle and whichever way you know again this is a free market and if peter doesn't wish to participate that is fine he is participating in his own way and that is as good
Comments 0