저자: PeterSchiff · 외국인
요약 보기
결론: 영상은 자본주의와 정부 개입을 구분하지 못하는 현 정책 문제를 지적하며, 금리 인하와 양적완화가 근본 해결이 아니라는 주장이다. [핵심 주장] 정치인들은 '리스크를 본인이 지는 자본주의'와 '남의 돈을 쓰는 사모펀드식 레버리지'를 구분하지 못한다. [근거] 2008년 이후 자본주의와 규제, 중앙계획이 뒤섞여 쓰이고 있다고 본다. [리스크] 현재 가격 신호(금리 등)의 무결성이 훼손된 상태라고 진단한다. [전망] 금리와 정책 부양이 계속되면 결국 경제가 붕괴할 것이며, 지금 구조조정이 필요하다고 주장한다. [종목·자산] 영상 자막에서 특정 종목이나 자산의 구체적 가격 방향 언급은 확인되지 않는다.
다듬은 글
economy where to fks on fks on main have there a dang all suff have for years current politicians are incapable of distinguishing between capitalism where risk is retained invested by princi individuals and extra where effectively other people money is used under the priv equity borrows other people money inc invests own money history maths would tell us they are very different things and yet the distinction between retaining your own capital in your own partnership at your own bank or your own firm and using other people money let alone the ability to use the money of the st some other thanet joins the tor of the real crash to save yourself and country narrative goes many of these lines joins us panel the cory booker thing struck me peter and langage capitalism think they want everybody have an opportunity everybody have a fair shake and all i believe everybody's intent of both political persuasion i believe that most people actually feel that we to l a sense of retained risk and the difference invest who has the responsibility for the risk screwing it up and inc that comes with that and new parade alls rid all ral fair but i'm saying politically and that's your opinion i don't disagree with you and i agree with what you're saying but what i'm saying is we have watched since 2008 these words mixed up all over capitalism getting aad name with all regulations and all their central planning sure but forget even the fix because i understand but we the fixes i don't want to get away from the fixes because everybody's got a different fix and a different thing i want to stick to the singular thing karen which is the concept of retain risk and whether you're responsible for your decisions and your resources and to collaborate with us or whoever is around you and this is not that's not a political posture practice it but it feels like and i think this is part of the fairness argument the president was talking i think it's been part of the lesson that i think a lot of people in that 99% when the market crashed is that there are a lot of people in this country who get to play by a set of rules so they don't ret access poli also access because of money resources whereas i think aot of people i think what obama talking about is there a lot of people their mortgage did everything they supposed to do still lost their ob he talking about fair why is it fair that a such lim am of time to be here and so other things talk about i don't care about those things i about a culture su that has lost its ability to distinguish between actual retain risk and transferring it away and we using we got a small group of people that are using access to the government and the banking system to hide behind the very language that all of usare regardless of cylinder and got take allm got take people washington special we have govern subs any industries guarantee any all where we are have currently have no price integrity in any onap let be hest about that and say once we know where we want to go which is this place of integrity we in this place of non integrity we can't just do that it's not like the switching political exp but what is actually happening now and not that just washington we have to take but how do you kind work towards fixing even identifying we have structural under our ec years federal res to much we spend too much the government is too big all this is because we have this money policy coming from the f it's come to an end when this thing collapses it's going to be awful i guess what we're saying is how do you do without the collapse we this room accepts that premise you don't have to convince us of that where we are yes okay we're saying okay this thing is gna have a heart attack and we're saying can we get in there and do heart bypass surgery before this turkey keels over because we know it's screwed up and and how do you sell the heart bypass surgery is a now we need there bic that will cure this economy but we don't want to do that we want to keep shooting it up with stimulus nov so we don't feel the pain but the disease get third option which goes to a de restructuring not at the expense of the poorest but a de restructuring at the exp of the banks the banks but a lot of people gets from govern are have tos they employees and it's lofty i just think that the end of the day either one believes that the government has a ro or doesn't you're saying to me and to the panel and to the nation that you think the government has zero when it comes to how capitalism functions i don't agree with that i think it actually does have a you think the government should be to eliminate capital re and invent money no i think the government should say if you're going to big then you have to put more money up us in 200 was the free market that was govern that wrong no and i predicted it when no else did you remember you be patient with i think this is interesting because i know for a cap toes res knowing that ick we agree banks everybody bought this mad parad shift than who did what to what i'm saying is that once we ac the fact we got syst right ways that as much as we would like to be a snap re all human trans integrity aes rates have to go nos to let them go because the banks will fail and govern have to default on oig r all more in that i think we harm ourselves when we get lost in whether it's the government or the free market or the corporations the government fault and that we serve ourselves when we acknowledge what we all need to acknowledge which is that the integrity of pricing period is being corrupted govern hc res bas dispute saying and at the time the markets need tove forward and i thank you guys for even let me attempt referee madness peter jy thank you suan ken thank you
Comments 0