명장 홈📈 주식명장주식 유튜브를 글로 읽고 저자의 예측을 실제 가격으로 확인합니다명장 게시판 홈요청하기

한국어 · English

톰리

정확도 점수+2.5
순위41
채점 발언1152건
적중 / 시장대비 / 수익가중59.5% / 57.0% / 64.2%
1개월 수익 / 시장·베타 초과 / 동료초과+2.3% / +1.9% / +0.5
상승 / 하락 / 중립71.2% / 12.6% / 16.2%
잘 맞는 기간1y
수분 표시뒷북수분,홍수분,화수분
주 채널CNBC Television
국적외
메모
갱신2026-10-28 07:00:00

주요 종목: #S&P500 (662)#미국기술주 (429)#BTC (427)#미국채금리 (219)#비트코인 (196)

점수 계산 방법

TOM LEE SPILLS THE BEANS FOR BMNR STOCK INVESTORS. IF YOU OWN MORE THAN $5,700 OF BITMINE, LISTEN

BMNR STOCK INSIGHTS · 2026-10-26 · 유튜브 시청 14 · 게시판 조회 12 · 외국인

외국인

유튜브 썸네일

원문 보기

다듬은 글 보기

Bitmine Immersion Technologies or BMNR is a stock I've been watching closely because it offers investors a way to gain substantial exposure to Ethereum through a publicly traded company. The stock has been extremely volatile, moving with the cryptocurrency market, changing investor sentiment, and the company's aggressive strategy of accumulating ETH.

And now we're seeing another interesting development. Bitmine has purchased an additional 10,452 ETH over the past week, bringing its total holdings to approximately 6.05 million ETH while also buying back 2.04 million of its own shares at an average price of $2248. Yet, despite those announcements, BMR shares have fallen to around $22, down almost 3% on the day and more than 20% over the past month, according to the figures provided.

So, the question I want to answer is whether this weakness creates a genuine buying opportunity or whether investors are underestimating the risks of a company whose financial future is so closely tied to Ethereum. Because there is a major difference between a company accumulating more assets and a company creating more value for each shareholder.

Bitmine could end up being a highly successful Ethereum treasury strategy. But that outcome depends on the price of ETH, the cost of acquiring it, the income generated from staking, the number of shares outstanding, and whether the market continues to assign a premium to BMR. Let's take a closer look at the business, its financial model, management share repurchases, and what a discounted cash flow analysis can actually tell us about its valuation.

The first thing that attracts me to Bitmine is the scale of its Ethereum holdings. According to the latest company announcement provided, Bitmine now owns approximately 6.05 million ETH, representing about 4.95% of the total Ethereum supply. management is approaching its stated goal of holding 5% of all ETH in circulation.

That is an ambitious strategy and it puts Bitmine in a very different category from a conventional operating business. A company like him and hers grows by attracting customers, increasing revenue and improving its margins. Bitmine's central strategy is different. accumulate Ethereum, stake a substantial portion of those holdings, and attempt to increase the value attributable to shareholders through disciplined treasury management.

The attraction is easy to understand. If Ethereum experiences a major bull market, Bitmine's existing holdings could appreciate by billions of dollars without the company needing to sell a new product to millions of customers. But that same structure creates significant downside risk. If Ethereum falls, the value of the treasury declines and BMNR shareholders can face an additional loss if the stock's valuation premium contracts at the same time.

That is why I would not evaluate this business simply by looking at how many ETH it owns. I want to know what those coins are worth, how much the company paid for them, how much income they generate, and how much of that underlying value actually belongs to common shareholders after accounting for liabilities and dilution.

One of the most interesting parts of the announcement is that Bitmine is not only buying Ethereum, it is also buying back its own shares. The company repurchased 2.04 million BMR shares over the past week at an average price of $2248, and management says it intends to repurchase shares when it believes they are relatively undervalued, subject to market conditions and its existing authorization.

Across 2026, Bitmine has reportedly repurchased 22.9 million common shares at an average price of $1748, representing nearly $400 million in total. I like the fact that management is thinking about shareholder value rather than focusing exclusively on increasing the size of the Ethereum treasury. However, I would not automatically interpret a buyback as evidence that the stock is cheap.

What matters is whether those repurchases increase the underlying value attributable to each remaining share. If the company buys back shares below its intrinsic value, that can be beneficial. If it buys shares at an excessive premium to its net asset value, the outcome may be less attractive. And because BMNR is a treasury company, management needs to compare the potential return from repurchasing its own stock with the potential return from buying additional Ethereum.

Both decisions involve risk and the better choice depends on the valuation at the time. The fact that BMNR is trading around $22 while the latest repurchases occurred at an average of $2248 does not by itself establish that the stock is undervalued. It simply gives us another data point to consider.

Now, one of the biggest things I want investors to understand about Bitmine is that the value of its Ethereum holdings can change dramatically even if the company makes no new purchases. Using an illustrative ETH price of $2,356, a treasury of approximately 6.05 million ETH would be worth about 14.25 billion.

If Ethereum were to rise to $3,000, those same holdings would be worth roughly $18.2 2 billion. At $4,000, the value would approach $24.2 billion. That is the bullish argument in a nutshell. Bitine already has substantial exposure to Ethereum. So, a recovery in the cryptocurrency could significantly increase the marked value of its treasury.

But let's look at the other side. If Ethereum fell to $1,500, those holdings would be worth approximately $9.1 billion. that would represent a decline of more than $5 billion from the $2,356 reference valuation. These are hypothetical calculations, not Ethereum price forecasts, and they exclude other assets, liabilities, changes in the number of shares, and any additional purchases.

Still, they demonstrate why BMNR can be such a volatile investment. A relatively modest percentage move in Ethereum translates into a very large dollar change in the company's asset base. And investors must remember that the stock price does not necessarily move in line with the value of the ETH treasury.

The market could assign BMNR a premium during a cryptobull market and then remove that premium during a downer. That means shareholders could potentially experience a double hit, a decline in the value of the underlying Ethereum and a decline in the valuation multiple applied to the company. There is another important part of the story and that is staking.

Bit mine reported that approximately 5.23 million ETH were staked with a value exceeding $12 billion according to its announcement. Staking can generate rewards by participating in Ethereum's proofofstake network, potentially allowing the company to accumulate additional ETH over time without relying exclusively on fresh capital.

I think this is an important component of the investment thesis because it gives Bitmine a potential source of recurring economic returns in addition to price appreciation. However, investors should focus on the actual net economics of staking rather than simply looking at the number of coins involved.

What is the effective yield, how much ETH is earned, what are the operating and infrastructure expenses, how much of the reward is retained, and how much is consumed by costs, and how does the company manage liquidity if market conditions deteriorate. Staking rewards are not guaranteed to maintain a particular yield and the dollar value of those rewards can fall if ETH declines.

So, while staking may strengthen Bitine's business model, I would want to see transparent, consistent reporting of the income it generates before assigning it a substantial valuation premium. The next issue is profitability and cash flow. With a traditional company, I would examine revenue growth, operating margins, free cash flow, return on invested capital, and the ability to reinvest earnings at attractive rates.

With BMNR, those metrics need to be interpreted differently because the value of its cryptocurrency treasury can dominate its financial performance. Unrealized gains or losses on ETH can make reported results volatile while staking related income and operating expenses tell us more about the economics of the ongoing business.

We also need to distinguish between accounting profit and cash available to shareholders. A rise in Ethereum's market price may increase the reported value of the treasury without generating cash that the company can distribute. Conversely, a decline in ETH does not necessarily mean the company has sold its holdings or realized a cash loss.

My concern is that investors may focus so heavily on the headline number of ETH owned that they overlook the cost of financing that accumulation and the amount of value ultimately attributable to each share. I would like to see BMNR demonstrate that it can grow its ETH exposure per diluted share, generate sustainable net staking income, and make capital allocation decisions that improve long-term shareholder returns.

Those are more meaningful indicators of progress than simply announcing another weekly purchase. Now, let's look at valuation because this is where I think investors need to be especially careful. The stock is trading around $22 according to the figures provided after falling more than 20% over the past month.

That decline may look attractive to investors who believe Ethereum is approaching the next stage of a bull market. But a lower share price does not automatically mean a lower valuation relative to the assets the company owns. The first calculation I would make is net asset value or NAV. We take the value of the Ethereum treasury, add cash and other investments, and subtract debt, liabilities, preferred claims, and other obligations.

We then divide the resulting common equity value by the appropriate diluted share count. That gives us a more useful estimate of the underlying value per share. Using the illustrative figures discussed earlier, the ETH treasury alone would be worth approximately $14.25 $25 billion at $2,356 per ETH.

If we use roughly $63 million shares as an indicative share count assumption, that represents approximately $2362 of gross ETH value per share. Compared with a share price near $22, the initial comparison might suggest that the stock trades below the gross value of its ETH holdings, but I would not call that proof of undervaluation.

The figures are not necessarily measured at the same time. The share count needs to be verified against the latest diluted total and gross treasury value is not the same as net asset value. We also need to reconcile the value of cash, other investments and liabilities and determine whether the stock deserves a premium or discount based on management's ability to create value.

The correct conclusion is that BMNR warrants a detailed NAV analysis, not that the stock is automatically a bargain because the ETH only calculation appears favorable. I also updated the valuation framework using a discounted cash flow model. But there is an important complication. A conventional DCF is not the best standalone valuation method for a company whose principal asset is Ethereum.

The existing ETH treasury should be valued separately while a DCF can be used to estimate the value of sustainable future cash flows from the staking and operating business. That separation helps prevent us from counting the same economic value twice. For an illustrative DCF, let's assume Bitmine generates $250 million in annual net cash flow from staking related operations with that cash flow growing by 5% annually for the next 5 years.

We then discount those cash flows at 12% and assume a long-term growth rate of 2.5% after year 5. Under those assumptions, the present value of the 5-year cash flows and the terminal value would be approximately $2.85 billion combined. Using an indicative $63 million shares, that would equal about $4.72 per share for the modeled income stream alone.

These figures are hypothetical assumptions, not verified company guidance or reported net staking cash flow. They are intended to demonstrate the mechanics of a DCF, not establish a precise fair value for BMNR. The most important point is that this $4.72 figure should not be interpreted as the total value of the stock.

We would need to add the value of the existing treasury and other assets, subtract liabilities and senior claims and adjust for the actual diluted share count. We would also need to ensure that staking rewards are not counted both in the treasury valuation and in the DCF. The model is highly sensitive to its starting cash flow, the discount rate, and the long-term growth assumption.

If sustainable net staking cash flow is lower than $250 million, the DCF value falls. If costs increase or the risk premium investors demand rises, the estimated value also declines. Conversely, stronger and more sustainable income would increase it. This is why I would use DCF as a supporting tool for BMNR rather than pretending it can independently determine the value of the entire company.

So, what would make me more confident that BMNR is attractively valued? I would want a current reconciled balance sheet and an updated NAV per share calculation. I would compare the stock price with that NAV and examine whether the premium or discount is changing. I would also track the amount of ETH owned per diluted share, net staking income, the terms of any financing arrangements, and the number of shares repurchased relative to new shares issued.

If management can consistently increase the underlying value per share without taking on excessive financing risk, that would strengthen the investment case. If the company grows its treasury while simultaneously diluting shareholders or paying too much for its own shares, the headline growth could be much less impressive than it appears.

For the next 12 months, I see three broad possibilities. In a bearish scenario, Ethereum continues declining. The value of Bitmine's treasury falls and investors assign the company a larger discount to its underlying assets. In that situation, BMR could fall further even if management continues buying ETH and repurchasing shares.

In a base scenario, Ethereum stabilizes or recovers gradually. Staking continues to generate rewards and the stock trades closer to a reasonable estimate of net asset value. In a bullish scenario, Ethereum experiences a strong recovery. Bit's treasury appreciates substantially and investors become willing to pay a premium for its scale and strategy that could produce significant upside, but it depends on several favorable outcomes occurring together.

I would treat price ranges such as $15 to $20 in a bearish scenario, $22 to $30 in a base scenario, and $35 to $45 or higher in a bullish scenario as illustrative possibilities rather than verified price targets. They are not outputs of the DCF and they should not be mistaken for forecasts supported by a complete balance sheet valuation.

Overall, I think BMNR is an interesting company to watch, but I would classify it as a higher risk Ethereum linked investment rather than a conventional growth stock. I like the potential benefits of staking, the scale of the treasury and management's willingness to repurchase shares when it believes the stock is undervalued.

The recent buyback is worth examining, particularly because the company has reportedly repurchased nearly $400 million of shares during 2026. But I also recognize that management's confidence does not eliminate the risk of an extended crypto down and continued Ethereum accumulation does not guarantee that existing shareholders will earn attractive returns.

So my conclusion is that B min could offer substantial upside if recovers and the company successfully increases the value attributable to each share. However, I would not buy it so because the stock has declined more than 20% or because management has purchased shares at $22.48. I would wait for a clearer comparison between the current price market and the properly calculated enough by diluted share supported by credible information about staking economics liabilities and future financing needs.

If the stock offers meaningful discount to consecutive underlying value that could create a more attractive entry point. If the price already reflects an optimistic Ethereum recovery, patience may be the better approach. And that is the key takeaway. Binary is not simply a bet on how much Ethereum Bitcoin can accumulate.

It [snorts] is a bet on Ethereum's future price, the economics of staking, management, capital allocation, and the value of the treasury relative to the stocks market capitalization. Those factors will determine whether today's weakness becomes a long-term opportunity or a warning that the market is pricing in risks investors should not ignore.

More than that, I want to share with you this. Isaiah 54:17 says, "No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper, and every tongue that shall raise against thee in judgment, thou shalt condemn." This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord and their righteousness is of me says the Lord. So God calls upon us and comfort that no weapon formed against us who believe in him and accept his righteousness shall be shall be formed against us or pro.

So accept the Lord. He is the best decision can ever made on this earth. Thank you. See you in the next video.

← 목록으로
공유페이스북밴드

이 글에 대해 요청(숨김) 수정 요청

댓글 0