원문 보기
Charlie Munger had a way of talking that made the world feel simpler, clearer, and somehow more honest. He never tried to impress you. Instead, he tried to make you see reality the way he saw it, without emotion, without ideology, without illusions. In this conversation, he starts where many Americans get uncomfortable, China.
But instead of fear, Munger sees progress. Instead of competition, he sees evolution. And instead of political talking points, he sees the long arc of human prosperity. I'm glad that we ran a big trade deficit with China that enabled them to rapidly get out of poverty and obscurity. I welcome the Chinese to the group of advanced nations which I think we enabled considerably by our willingness to to trade with them as they moved ever upward in terms of complexity of enterprise.
So I like what's happened. I don't regard it as unfair and bad. To Mer this wasn't about ideology. It was about lifting hundreds of millions out of misery. He genuinely believed that China's rise was one of the most important economic miracles in human history. And he believed that complaining about the consequences about industries lost or companies outco competed was ignoring the bigger truth.
But but basically the Chinese broke the Berkshire Hathaway shoe business in Maine. It disappeared basically because their shoes were very good and cheaper. I'm not mad at China over that. And Berkshire has prospered. It's not so good for Maine, but we can't help it. There's no way to make an advanced civilization never hurt anybody as it evolves.
That's pure munger. No bitterness, no victimhood, just acceptance of reality. He doesn't romanticize the past or resent the future. To him, competition is natural and adapting is part of survival. When he's asked whether Birkshere might one day buy a major Chinese company, Munger's answer carries the nuance of someone who deeply understands both cultures.
He believes in partnership, not dominance, mutual respect, not suspicion. It's a worldview that almost doesn't exist in modern geopolitics. When the topic shifts to electric cars, Munger stays grounded. Something rare in an industry driven by hype. Well, BYD's biggest advantage is in the electric cars where they are so close to the cutting edge of battery technology.
And so, they'd be crazy not to emphasize the hybrid and electric cars over the gasoline cars. Not that they'll go out of the gasoline market, but I think they will be biggest in the hybrid and electric cars. And when Elon Musk comes up, Munger's clarity becomes even more obvious. He sees Musk not as a hero and not as a villain, but as exactly what he is, a brilliant, volatile force of nature.
and its founder is bold and brilliant and swings for the fences. And of course, people like that get some remarkable results and sometimes they get some quick failure. And I have the faintest idea how Elon Musk is going to turn out. But I think he's got a considerable chance of success and a considerable chance of failure.
He seems to like it that way. That's classic Munger. No hype, no tribalism, no sensationalism, just honest probability. When the subject becomes healthcare, he gets even more blunt. He doesn't dance around the flaws of the American system. He hits directly at the heart of the problem. So it could happen in two years even then.
I mean, start happening. Practically everybody is disenchanted with the bureaucracy and cost and foolish results in our own culture, our own medical system. Bureaucracy plus entrenched interests were profiting on this on the existing system in various ways. I come from California. If everybody in the nation had Kaiser health care as we have it in California, the net quality of medicine in the United States would go way up.
And Kaiser has never been able to succeed very much outside of California because the entrenched vested interests stomp on it because of its success in California. You're talking about a field where the entrenched interests are making a lot of money. They don't want the change. You wouldn't either if your livelihood depended on it.
And so, of course, it's very hard to change our system. The reason the Singapore system is so much better than ours is they didn't have a lot of entrenched interests that were that powerful and and they had a brilliant leader. Now he the sandware system costs about a fifth of what ours cost and serves better.
He sees health care not as a political fight but as a simple clash between what works and what is profitable for the wrong people. On Wells Fargo, Munger shows another side of his philosophy, the belief that mistakes, when painful enough can actually create better behavior over time. Let me ask you about Wells Fargo.
Um, it sounded like you and Warren are standing by your bank at this point, but I I wonder, you know, at what point is enough enough? Um, and how do you decide when a company is just, okay, this is not going to turn around. We're going to abandon ship here. Well, I don't think for a minute that Wells Fargo is in any way rotten to the core.
They just had some incentive programs that that caused some bad behavior and then they react reacted poorly to trouble when it came. So they made mistakes of judgment. But I think you'll find them that they hate what's happened so much that they'll be less likely to make mistakes in the future, not more likely.
[snorts] I actually think this is good for Wells Fargo. on a very long-term basis. It's agony to go through, but but they're going to be better for it. This is the same consistency you see throughout his life. Bad incentives create bad behavior. Fix the incentives and people eventually realign. And when discussing investing, he delivers one of the most important lines of the entire interview.
But you got to remember that in our way of thinking all intelligent investment is value investment because why would you want to buy something which wasn't worth as much as you were paying for it? And who wouldn't like buying something for less than it's worth? So the only difference when people talk about value investor, you're always be a value investor.
Now there are various ways to look for value investments just as there are various places to fish. And if the f first rule of fishing is to fish where the fish are the first rule of value investing is to find some place to fish for value investments where there are a lot of them. And of course it's gotten hard in the United States to find easy value investments because the world is so competitive.
To Munger, value investing isn't a style. It's simply rationality. Then comes the moment that became instantly iconic. His absolute dismantling of Bitcoin, not with anger, not with emotion, just Mer applying the same rational filter he applies to everything else. I of course have no interest in in that because it's not my subject and I see an artificial speculative medium that people are buying just because they think they can sell it to somebody else at a higher price even though it inherently has no intrinsic value.
And so I regard the whole business as antisocial, stupid, immoral. Nobody in his right mind would want a payment system where the very thing you were using went up and down by 20% in a day. No, I regard the thing as a as a combination of dementia and immorality. And I think the people that are pushing it are a disgrace.
That's one of the purest Charlie Munger moments ever recorded. Brutal honesty delivered with a surgeon's precision. and finally politics. But instead of attacking politicians, he turns the lens inward onto the human tendency to hate. I consider it counterproductive to hate as much as both parties now hate.
And I have disciplined myself and I now regard all politicians higher than I used to. I did that as a matter of self-preservation. The other thing I did to make me feel better about the current scene is I reread the decline and fall of the Roman Empire and it goes on for a great many hundreds of pages and that made me feel a lot better about the current political scene.
We're way ahead of the Romans at the end. That's a pretty low bar. Well, I didn't. It's very helpful. I suggest you try it. You will feel better about the present world if you look at that one. That's the thread running through all of Munger's thinking. Perspective. Zoom out far enough and today's problems stop feeling apocalyptic.
Zoom out far enough and you see the patterns of human nature repeating across centuries. Zoom out far enough and you realize how few things truly matter. Charlie Mer didn't just give financial advice. He gave life philosophy packaged inside a dry voice, sharp logic, and a refusal to lie to himself or others.
His words here are more than commentary. They're a framework for thinking clearly in a noisy
Comments 0