저자: 미상 · 외국인
요약 보기
결론: 영상은 비트코인의 실용성과 기술적 가치에 대한 논의이며, 구체적인 가격 방향 예측은 없음. 워런 버핏은 비트코인이 튤립 버블 같다고 보며 10~20년 내 사라질 수도 있다고 비판했고, 화폐로서의 기능(가격 기준이 계속 변함)이 부족하다고 지적함. 영상 속 논의는 비트코인 기술(블록체인)이 시점 증명(proof of publishing)을 제공해 정보 무결성 확보에 활용될 수 있다는 점에 초점. 위키리크스가 암호키를 비트코인 블록체인에 기록해 문서 시점을 증명하는 사례가 언급됨. 화폐 활용에 대해서는 현재 주로 불법 거래(실크로드 언급)에 쓰이지만, 합법 거래와 불법 거래의 연결고리 역할이 있어 가치가 있다는 견해가 나옴. 윙클보스 형제가 비트코인으로 버진 갤럭틱 우주 여행 비용을 내겠다고 한 것에 대해, 리처드 브랜슨은 비트코인 보유자가 그 돈을 우주선 구매에 쓰는 것을 선호한다고 답함. 가격 변동성(volatility)이 크다는 점이 인정되었으며, 변동성 속에서 돈을 버는 사람도 많다는 언급이 있음. 출연자 중 브랜슨과 버핏, 게이츠, 머스크 등의 발언이 인용되나 현재 시점의 구체적 가격 전망은 없음. 전반적으로 단기·중기 가격 방향에 대한 명시적 발언은 확인되지 않음.
다듬은 글
welcome to the coin pilot channel to receive updates of all cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin news and views remember to subscribe and leave a like on below to receive notifications enjoy the video the need to move money from place to place the cost of doing so the overhead as you put it makes me think Believe It or Not of Bitcoin because some people have said hey bitcoin is the answer to those problems are you a believer well bitcoin is exciting because it shows how cheap it can be bitcoin is is better than currency and it you don't have to be physically in the same place and of course for large transactions currency can get pretty inconvenient the customers we're talking about aren't trying to be anonymous you know they're willing to be known so McClane technology is key and you could add to it or you could build a similar technology where there's enough attribution that people feel comfortable this is nothing to do with terrorism or any type of money laundering so what does Buffett not like right now that would be Bitcoin he says that Bitcoin right now let's looks a little bit tulip like to him it's out of currency I mean it it does not need to test it for currency it I wouldn't be surprised if it's not around in 10 or 20 years why does it not meet the definition of a currency because then people say well I'll show you goods and bitcoins but they change the price of those every time the price of the dollar changes in relations but their pricing off the dollar they could say well I'll sell it to you in barrels of oil but if they time the price of oil changes they change the number of barrels you have to have that's not your oil is not the currency the technology breaks Orwell's dictum it breaks all wells dictum by providing proof of publishing at a certain time and that is the intellectual underpinning of that whole system and can be used for lots and lots of other things and so that's the big expansion we're about to see in Bitcoin all the rise from this basic premise that you can prove that a particular statement a particular consensus a particular contract happened at a particular time globally and it requires a subversion of every single jurisdiction where people are running Bitcoin to overturn that am i right in understanding that you're saying that the Bitcoin architecture has applications far beyond the economic role that Bitcoin can play and that that architecture is very strengthening to the life of information in the digital space making it less vulnerable to the kind of mischief you talked about in Russia or elsewhere it's that what you're saying exactly exactly that underlying architecture can be used for publishers for example so that as an example we are starting to use Bitcoin WikiLeaks stuffing our cryptographic keys of stuff that we publish so we prove that we have published stuff at a particular time by stuffing it in Bitcoin and the blockchain and then if someone were to come and try and modify the material that we have published to take out particular parts that would be detectable do you think Bitcoin will be disruptive in that way and we were now it's a speculative currency will it be something that will be what normal consumers would use and will disrupt the banking industry my opinion but coin is that I mean I think Bitcoin is probably a good thing but it's it's essentially it's made I think the thing will be Haven that's probably good quoted here in there but the it it's it's like is primarily going to be a means of doing illegal transactions but that's not necessarily entirely bad because you know you know some things should be maybe shouldn't be illegal so but the combination of Silk Road and Bitcoin will save us well it will be useful for legal and illegal transactions otherwise it would have no value as a use of for legal transaction because you have to have a legal to illegal bridge I don't own any bitcoins in fact one can pay for a tour on Virgin Galactic up to the moon with Bitcoin I think the the Winklevoss twins have said that they would do exactly that I think this is a currency a currency that's really gonna work eventually I think it is working and there will be other currencies like it that may may be even better but in the meantime there's a big industry around Bitcoin and you know people have made fortunes at Bitcoin some people have lost me at a Bitcoin it's volatile yeah but it is quite volatile but but you know when in politic volatility people can make money out of politics why was it important for you to give it sort of that stamp of approval that endorsement by saying to the Winklevoss twins yes you can pay for the the ride with Bitcoin because I'm not foolish I mean if people have got lots of bitcoins and they want to go to space and I much rather they spent that money on our spaceship whether I keep little bitcoins is another matter they spend that money on a Virgin Galactic spaceship then on you know even we'll be sending people to space one day on Elon spaceship so we'll grab the money well it's well it's there you
Comments 0