저자: 미상 · 외국인
요약 보기
영상 결론: 켄 그리핀(시타델)이 의회 증언에서 운용자산을 2000억 달러 축소 발언했다는 주장과 이를 근거로 한 음모론적 주장으로, 투자 판단에 쓸 수 있는 종목·가격 예측은 없음. [시타델 거래 불법행위 주장] 이전 영상에서 다룬 시타델의 거래 위반으로 SEC·FINRA가 벌금을 부과했으나 처벌이 약했다고 주장. [그리핀 위증 주장] 그리핀이 의회 증언에서 운용자산 규모를 2000억 달러 낮게 말했다고 주장하며 이를 위증죄(18 USC 1621/162 언급)로 규정. 주장자는 기소되지 않은 이유를 증거 존재 여부, 기소 포기, 내부 고발 세 가지로 나눠 설명하고 법 위에 있다고 결론. [정치적 영향력 주장] 그리핀이 공화당 대형 후원자이며 하원 청문회 출석이 정치적 쇼였다고 주장. 시타델 전 SEC 직원 및 전 연준 의장 버냉키의 시타델 고문 역할을 언급. [옐런 재무장관 주장] 옐런이 시타델로부터 강연료 81만 달러를 받았고 이해충돌 회피를 약속한 윤리협약을 지키지 않았다고 주장. 과거 강연료 총액 700만 달러 이상 언급. [은행 파산계획(리빙윌) 영상 인용] JP모건 등 대형은행의 파산계획이 신뢰할 만한지 연준·FDIC에 질의한 청문회 발언을 인용하며 투명성 강화를 촉구. [투자 관련 발언] 대상 종목(AMC, GME 등)에 대한 1~3개월 가격 방향 예측은 발언되지 않았음. 영상은 '투자 촉구'성 구독·좋아요 요청을 포함. [주의] 자막이 자동인식이며 위증·뇌물 등 중대한 주장은 사실 확인이 필요한 의혹 제기로 봐야 함.
다듬은 글
in the last two videos we talked about ken griffin and we looked at some of the trading misconduct that citadel has been involved in but specifically we looked at trading misconduct that led either the sec or finra to impose penalties on citadel for this same trading misconduct now don't get me wrong the penalties imposed were pretty laughable and it's pretty obvious to me that these penalties did not serve as an effective means for deterring companies like citadel from participating in serious trading misconduct while this is all extremely concerning for any retail investor participating in the market what's more concerning is where we left off in yesterday's video so just to refresh your memory a little bit we left off talking about ken griffin's sworn testimony to congress where he was asked about citadel's funds under management and lied under oath by understating the figure by a whopping 200 billion dollars this is a crime and is known as perjury even worse it's a federal crime which requires a minimum one-year mandatory sentence according to section 162 of 18 usc and yet griffin hasn't done a single day of time in the federal penitentiary so uh why is that well maybe it's because the prosecuting attorney decided not to file charges there's only three ways that i know on how to stay out of the federal penitentiary once you've committed a federal crime the first one being that you don't get caught of course the second way is that the prosecution decides not to file formal charges or in other words indict you due to lack of evidence and the third well you'd have to rat on somebody or you know pretty much be a snitch so if we go through the process of elimination here we would have to rule the first one out right off the bat because there is a record of ken griffin's testimony given under oath which does not coincide with what citadel securities provided in their adv filing and we're not talking about a small mistake here we're talking about a 200 billion dollar difference that being said this rules out not only number one but number two as well because if it's on record then he did get caught and the record is the evidence so while i have absolutely no doubt in my mind that ken griffin would snitch out one of his buddies should push come to shove i think we can eliminate number three here as well because the prosecution simply turned a blind eye to the felony that has been committed here otherwise i would expect to have seen some headlines all over the news talking about ken griffin being served with a federal indictment you know by now at least so seeing as how this hasn't happened yet it would appear that ken griffin is above the law and that being said i think that every retail investor deserves to know exactly why now while i can't come out and flat out to tell you why i think that i can certainly provide you with all of the dots and even put them in order for you so from there of course you can take your crayons and draw a big fat line to connect them all and i'm gonna get right to it but before i do i do want to ask you or task you with smashing that like button so that the youtube algo gets this video out to as many apes as possible and that'll be your contribution to the movement and of course if you're new here i'd absolutely love to have you join our growing community of apes that are all fighting for the same cause so go ahead hit that subscribe button as well and don't forget to tap that bell so that you're notified immediately each time i drop a new video just like this one but without any further ado let's get this party started so the first thing i want to point out is that our boy kenny happens to be a generous donor in fact he's one of the largest donors to the republican party one of the largest donors that they've seen in a very long time and he certainly is no stranger to washington we saw this paying off for him at least somewhat at the house hearing words also going around that bringing griffin in was just a political ploy a quick example of this is rep trey hollingsworth of indiana when he called citadel's inclusion in the hearing a sideshow to some of the real questions we should be asking about what happened and what's going on with the retail investor so by all appearances citadel's influence in washington is kind of hard to overstate what's especially concerning for me to see but doesn't seem to be getting much attention at all is the fact that citadel's executives are among those in the finance industry that regulators frequently consult with in making decisions and just as concerning is the fact that griffin also employs several former sec employees and i'm not talking about former sec janitors working for griffin i'm talking about former employees such as steven laparillo who ran the agency's trading and markets division and is now citadel securities legal chief i'm talking about the fact that former federal reserve chairman ben bernanke is currently also employed as citadel's senior advisor i'm also talking about the fact that u.s treasury secretary janet yellen accepted eight hundred and ten thousand dollars in bribes i mean pardon me i meant to say speaking fees she collected eight hundred and ten thousand dollars in speaking fees from citadel now under normal circumstances i'd say that this is none of my business and wouldn't think twice about who's paying her or why but these aren't just normal circumstances and the fact that she refuses to recurse herself from overseeing matters related to citadel and ken griffin even though she agreed to do so in the ethics agreement she signed when she returned to the white house makes me believe that something shady could potentially be going on here so to put all this into context for you it's imperative that you understand exactly who janet yellen is but first i'd like to point out that i find it extremely strange that as the current treasury secretary and former federal reserve chair janet yellen would accept eight hundred and ten thousand dollars for speaking fees from citadel which just happens to be the same hedge fund that was heavily engaged in short selling us treasuries so with that being said both of yellen's former positions which would be fed chair and white house policy advisor are the country's two highest ranking economic policy positions meaning she is arguably considered to be the most qualified person ever to take on her new role as treasury secretary so keep that in mind real quick and let's take a look at some other speaking fees that miss yellen has collected as we can see here we have jpmorgan chase goldman sachs credit suisse and even deutsche bank yellen has collected over seven million dollars in the last couple of years in speaking fees but why does this matter it matters because all these banks are record holders when it comes to being fined and fined for market manipulation and pretty much shady practices just like uh you know citadel is but maybe i'm just overreacting i mean i i don't think that just because janet yellen accepted eight hundred and ten thousand dollars from ken griffin you know citadel that uh it's gonna make a difference at all or that she's gonna play any favorites i mean and even if she would it's not like ken griffin would allow her to do that because he's a man of honor i mean it's not like he's uh ever donated any money to anybody before or paid for any other speaking fees and then sent them personal emails with his problems and telling him to fix speed bumps that caused ten thousand dollars of damage to his car or anything that that's never happened before so so yeah let's not speculate but anyhow i've got a clip to play for you guys i want you guys to watch all of it and then let me know in the comments below what your thoughts are on it because to me it was an amazing find can you honestly say that jp morgan could be resolved in a rapid and orderly fashion as described in its plans with no threats to the economy and no need for a taxpayer bailout so the living will process as i understand it is something that's intended to be iterative in the sense that the firms submit plans and will receive feedback from the regulators on whether or not we think that the fed and the fdic regard these plans as sufficient to enable resolution under the bankruptcy code we have given feedback on the first round of plans that were submitted and are working actually to at this point to give feedback on the second round of plans in fact the firms have now submitted a third round of plans i'm sorry chairman i i'm just a little bit confused jb morgan submitted a round of plans in 2012 and my understanding is that neither the fed nor the fdic said that those plans were not credible it then submitted plans in 2013 and neither the fed or the fdic said they were not credible and it has submitted plans in 2014.
so i'm not sure on whether you're saying the plans are not credible and you're continuing to talk with them and asking them to change their plans is that the case well we're working to give these firms feedback on their second round of submissions and i think what we need to do is to give them a road map for where we see obstacles to orderly resolution under the bankruptcy code and to give them an opportunity to address those obstacles i i appreciate that you're doing that but the statute it seems to me is pretty clear here that it's mandatory that these plans be submitted each year and that each year you determine whether or not the plans are credible and i guess the question i'm asking is have they ever gotten to a plan that you can say with a straight face is credible well i i've understood this to be a process um these are extremely complex um documents for these firms to produce our second round of submissions we're looking at plans that run into tens of thousands of pages and that i mean i i think what was intended is that this determination you're talking about about whether or not they're credible do they this question is do they facilitate an orderly resolution um and i think we need to give these firms feedback so i'll stop there because we're running out of time but but i have to say gerry allen i think the language and the statute is pretty clear that you are required the fed is required to call it every year on whether these institutions have a credible plan and i remind you there are very effective tools that you have available to you that you can use if those plans are not credible including forcing these financial institutions to simplify their structure or forcing them to liquidate some of their assets in other words free fdic but also to bring some kind of confidence to the marketplace and uh to the american taxpayer that in fact there really is a plan for doing something if one of these banks starts to implode you said that these plans run to the tens of thousands of pages all i can say is that what's been released to the public is 35 pages long that's about uh one page for every 100 subsidiaries that have to be dealt with i think that the plans that have been released by these companies have not been something that the public can look at and say yeah i see that they've got a plan to get through this so i hope you would urge greater transparency uh by these large financial institutions that are required to submit these plans and i hope the fed will be making a call on whether or not the fed under its statutory responsibility sees these plans as credible for resolving these financial institutions if they hit financial trouble just like this downl
댓글 0