원문 보기
Raoul Pal just said crypto is going from 2.5 trillion to 100 trillion dollars and he thinks selling right now makes no sense. According to him, this is the moment everything starts to accelerate. Not just prices, but the entire system. We are moving into what he calls the exponential age where AI, robotics, and crypto combine to rebuild finance, identity, and the global economy on entirely new rails.
And the key idea is simple, when you're dealing with exponential technology, trying to trade every cycle can cost you the biggest move. That's where Tom Lee comes in. He agrees the bull market is still intact and likely continues into 2026, but along the way there will be volatility. Corrections of 10 to 20% that feel bigger than they are even as the broader trend continues higher.
A massive long-term opportunity driven by liquidity and technological acceleration with short-term moves that test conviction before the next leg up. In this video, we're going to break down Raoul Pal's 100 trillion dollar thesis, what's really driving this market behind the scenes, and why this phase of the cycle could be far bigger than most people expect.
; People are so freaked out about the cyclicality in crypto um that they miss the bigger picture. Now, we're building that dashboard that hopefully will come out soon, which gives people the ability to buy the two standard deviations oversold and sell it when it's high, take some lifestyle chips off.
It makes it so it's not just waiting for when I do mine. It's like you can make a your own methodology, you can choose it, you can do it. Um that's fine. But really, if we're going from two and a half trillion dollars to 100 trillion dollars, why the [ __ ] would you ever sell anything? I mean, that's that's what I keep getting into my head is like, unless you have to or want to, you literally wouldn't.
You would just keep finding opportunities where it gets oversold to buy more because that's where it's going. And you know, if we think about the agent economy and its infinite time, we think about the clarity act getting passed, we think about the entire [ __ ] financial system building on the on crypto rails.
Think about ID. Think about agentic ID, robotic ID, human ID. Think of all of these things. And you're going to sell it because Raoul and Julian thinks the liquidity cycle's going to slow down for a bit. It's [ __ ] bananas. And I I'm kind of I kind of get pissed off with it now, um even though I understand people need it.
But I'm just when I look at the opportunity and I present it and I talk about it, and we're this moment in time, the fastest acceleration of technology in all of human history, and we're trying to time technology. It's stupid. People are so focused on the short-term cycles in crypto that they're missing what's actually happening underneath the surface.
That's the core of Raoul Pal's argument. Every time the market pulls back, fear comes in fast. Narratives flip. Suddenly, people start talking about the end of the cycle, the top being in, or the need to rotate out. But zoom out and the structure looks completely different. What we're seeing is not a market breaking down.
It's a market consolidating inside a much larger expansion. Raoul Pal frames it in a much bigger way. If crypto is sitting around two and a half trillion dollars today, and the long-term trajectory is closer to 100 trillion, then every correction starts to look less like a warning and more like an opportunity.
That's why he pushes the idea of building a system around buying when things are oversold instead of trying to perfectly time entries and exits. This lines up with what's been happening recently. Liquidity conditions have started to improve again. Manufacturing data has shown signs of stabilizing after months of contraction, and risk assets have responded quickly.
Crypto in particular has been leading that move. When liquidity returns, it doesn't move slowly. It moves fast, and it rewards positioning over precision. At the same time, the foundation continues to build. Large institutions are expanding their exposure through spot Bitcoin ETFs, while tokenization is becoming a serious focus across major financial players.
The infrastructure is being laid out in real time, not in theory. So, when you combine a growing macro tailwind with a structural shift toward crypto adoption, the idea of constantly stepping out of the market starts to lose its edge. What we're doing is fully transitioning between the exponential age, which is the acceleration phase where technology starts compounding, into the economic singularity.
This is the move we're making right now, where the old rails are no longer fit for intelligent for silicon-based speed. Right, don't forget silicon processes a million times faster. That's six orders of magnitude faster than the human neuron. Nothing is set up for this, and we have to rebuild everything from scratch.
And that is what's underway. This is the biggest phase transition shift humanity's ever faced. Um and the whole thesis of don't [ __ ] this up is this. Is you just keep hold of this trade in every guise that you've got it, and ride the [ __ ] thing. We're going to shift from the magic formula of GDP equals population growth plus debt growth uh plus productivity growth into the economic singularity version, which is AI plus robots plus humans, and productivity is how much intelligence you can produce per unit of energy.
Yeah. And then debt will get eroded away because GDP growth So strong. will be so strong and inflation will be very subdued over the period of time that when you look back like the 1950s and 60s, you ended up going from 120% of debt to GDP down to about 10. And we'll do the same all over again. And no one's I I again I I I've I haven't spoken to anybody who's thinking like that.
No. But it's but it's [ __ ] it's [ __ ] obvious. And I keep saying these things now. It's like all of this is so [ __ ] obvious and it's falsifiable and it is m- literally the whole framework is not putting a foot wrong on these big broad concepts. Sure, wiggles here and there, but it is happening.
It is happening at scale and this whole funneling of the of the entire focus of the world is moving towards intelligence per unit of energy and that's the entire game. Raoul Pal is not describing a normal economic cycle. He is describing a structural break in how growth itself is created. The idea he keeps returning to is a transition into what he calls the exponential age.
This is the phase where traditional economic models stop working as clean explanations for what is happening in markets. In the old framework, growth was driven by population increases, debt expansion, and incremental productivity gains. That model still exists, but it is no longer the dominant force shaping the future.
What replaces it is something far more aggressive in scale and spee begin to compound together. Instead of human speed systems processing information and capital allocation decisions, silicon-based systems start operating at millions of times faster cycles. That difference is not marginal. It changes the entire structure of productivity.
Recent developments in artificial intelligence adoption support this direction. Enterprise integration is accelerating across sectors from finance to logistics to software development. At the same time, tokenization experiments by large financial institutions are moving from pilot programs into early-stage deployment.
The direction of travel is clear even if the final structure is not fully defined yet. This is where Raoul Pal's $100 trillion thesis becomes more than just a prediction. It becomes a reflection of what happens when a new technological base layer starts absorbing existing systems. Capital markets, identity systems, and payment rails begin migrating toward programmable infrastructure.
Crypto becomes less of a speculative asset class and more of a settlement layer for digital value. In that environment, short-term thinking becomes increasingly disconnected from long-term outcomes. Price volatility still exists, but it starts to sit inside a much larger expansion curve that most participants are not positioned for.
And this is where the narrative begins to connect directly into liquidity dynamics because even exponential systems still move through cycles of expansion and contraction beforgge; We said here that this was going to reverse because of the liquidity flows came back. And [ __ ] me, did that reverse. As you said, I mean, that was a historic like this one was as well.
I mean, there is no stopping this. Every time you have a correction, and people are yelling at us saying it was all over, it was all over, and then that happened. But, you know, we've had the same thing in I'll come back to stocks in a sec, but, you know, as you mentioned, you know, when everybody said that's it, the party's over, it's the end of the bull market, we can all go away, the market did exactly what we suggested, which was come up, and this was exactly to do and I think you you should show the tail that chart and the bit the one we looked at this morning, you and I, which is the US liquidity chart.
I mean, it's like it's [ __ ] perfect. Um so, you know, that seems to be playing out as expected. The liquidity flow is happening. It's all on track for what we expect. I still think crypto will outperform uh tech stocks uh at the next phase of the cycle. So, I think that's pretty good. Every major move in crypto continues to come back to one force underneath everything else, liquidity.
Raoul Pal has repeatedly emphasized that what looks like random volatility in crypto is often just a reflection of global liquidity conditions shifting in real time. When liquidity expands, risk assets accelerate. When liquidity tightens, everything compresses and sentiment flips fast. This is why many investors misread the cycle.
They focus on headlines and short-term price action while the real driver sits underneath. Liquidity determines how much capital is available to chase assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. And when that capital returns, crypto reacts first. Recent market behavior has followed this pattern. After stress and uncertainty, liquidity conditions have started showing early signs of stabilization again.
Risk assets have responded with crypto often leading both direction and speed. Even small shifts in liquidity can create large moves because of leverage and positioning. This is also where crypto's relationship with tech matters. Raoul Pal expects crypto to outperform tech in the next phase because it sits further out on the risk curve.
When liquidity returns, it flows into higher beta assets first, and crypto sits at the top. At the same time, this is why corrections still happen inside strong uptrend. Liquidity is not a straight line. It moves in waves, creating fear, liquidations, and narrative shifts that make every pullback feel more dangerous than it is.
But in a broader uptrend driven by adoption and liquidity expansion, those pullbacks often accumulation zones rather than breakdown signals. And that dynamic sets the stage for Tom Lee's outlook, where the long-term remains bullish, but the path forward still includes volatility and periodic shocks.
I think it when we look back at the end of this year, I think 2026 will look like a continuation of the bull market that started in 2022. But and and really a period when economic resilience is much more visible. But at the same time, there's two I think substantial transitions that the market has to grapple with.
Maybe three. You know, one is of course a new Fed. And [snorts] uh you know, the market always tests a new Fed. And that process of identifying and then confirmation plus the market test can create a correction. And I think that in 2026, our view is that White House the White House is going to be more deliberate in picking winners and losers.
In 2025, that caused a lot of disruption for technology IT consulting and for health care. And this year there's a lot more industries and sectors and even countries in the bull side. And I think that that creates uncertainty. You can tell by gold's rally. And so I think those two factors can cause a drawdown in 2026.
Those two factors, you said maybe a third. Yeah, so the third is that the market is still trying to understand how much is priced into AI. And so it's and you know, our view is still a strong narrative. Uh but as you know, um there's questions about the longevity, how much energy we really need, uh data center capacity.
And so, until the market is comfortable that there's other stronger narratives, which I think there's plenty like the ISM is turning up. I think housing could recover as rates are cut. But that transition again would cause uncertainty. So, I I'm guessing that the three collectively could cause a drawdown that feels like a bear market.
So, so implicit in that is what? Like a 20% peak-to-trough pullback or or more or less? Yeah, it it could be 10. I mean, if it's 10 by the way, it's going to feel like a bear market. But it it could be 15, it could be 20. But something that maybe brings us to a round trip from the start of the year cuz we've started off strong.
Maybe we'll be down year-to-date at some point, but then I think we really finish the year strong. Tom Lee is not calling for the end of the bull market. He is calling for a more complicated phase inside it. His base view is that the broader crypto and equity cycle that began in 2022 is still intact and likely continues into 2026.
Economic resilience has held up better than many expected and liquidity conditions remain supportive enough to sustain higher prices over time. But the path forward is no longer smooth expansion. It becomes uneven, rotational, and heavily sentiment driven. One of the key pressures he highlights is the Federal Reserve transition.
New policy direction always introduces uncertainty because markets need time to recalibrate expectations. Even without dramatic tightening, the process of testing a new Fed creates volatility. That uncertainty alone can trigger sharp corrections as positioning resets across risk assets. At the same time, government policy is becoming more active in shaping winners and losers across sectors.
This creates uneven performance across industries and increases market noise. Certain areas of technology and healthcare have already shown sensitivity to policy shifts, and that effect is expected to broaden. Gold strength has also reflected rising uncertainty in macro direction. The third pressure point is artificial intelligence valuation and infrastructure expectations.
Markets are still trying to understand how much growth is already priced in. Energy demand, data center capacity, and monetization timelines remain open questions. Until clarity improves, volatility is likely to persist. Despite that, Tom Lee's framework still leans bullish. Even a 10 to 20% drawdown would not break the broader trend.
Instead, it would likely reset leverage and positioning before continuation. And that is where the key connection forms with Raoul Pal's view. Because in both frameworks, volatility does not signal collapse. It signals transition inside a larger expansion cycle that is still unfolding. Both Raoul Pal and Tom Lee converge on one uncomfortable idea.
The biggest mistake in this market is not volatility. It is being positioned on the sidelines when the next expansion phase begins. Raoul Pal frames the long-term opportunity as a structural shift toward a $100 trillion crypto ecosystem. That projection is not based on short-term price action, but on the assumption that financial infrastructure, identity systems, and global value transfer continue migrating onto crypto rails.
In that environment, what looks expensive in the present can still be early in the broader adoption curve. He also stresses that trying to time every cycle becomes less effective in exponential systems. When technology adoption compounds, the distance between early and late positioning widens dramatically.
Missing even a single expansion phase can outweigh years of tactical trading gains. That is why his focus remains on accumulation during periods of weakness rather than repeated exits. Tom Lee adds a different layer to that same structure. He does not deny the presence of drawdowns, but he views them as part of a longer continuation pattern rather than cycle termination.
Corrections of 10 to 20% even when they feel severe do not necessarily disrupt the underlying trend when liquidity and macro conditions remain supportive. The interaction between these two views creates a consistent message. Short-term volatility is a feature of the transition, not a sign that the thesis is broken.
Liquidity cycles still dominate timing, but the direction is increasingly shaped by structural adoption. Recent market behavior continues to reflect that tension. Pullbacks are sharp, sentiment shifts quickly, but recovery phases tend to arrive just as fast once conditions stabilize. And that is the core takeaway from both perspectives.
The market is not moving toward exhaustion, it is moving through expansion phases that continue to reset expectations, positioning, and conviction at every stag.
댓글 0