์ ์: ThomasJames ยท ์ธ๊ตญ์ธ
์์ฝ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๊ฒฐ๋ก : ์์์ ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌํ์ด ์ํ์์์๊ฒ ๋๋ฌผ์ ์คฌ๊ณ ๊ทธ ๋๋ฌธ์ ์์ฅ์ด ๊ณง ํญ๋ฝํ๋ค๋ ์ฃผ์ฅ์ ํผ์น๋ฉฐ, ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ ๋๋ถ๋ถ ํธ์๊ณผ ์ถ์ธก์ด๋ค. ์ฃผ์ฅ 1 - ์ผ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌํ๊ณผ ์ํ ๋ก๋น: 2021๋ 2์ ํ์ ๊ธ์ต์๋น์ค์์ํ์ ์ถ์ํ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌํ์ด ์์๋ค(French Hill, Andy Barr, Wagner, Bill Huizenga ๋ฑ)์๊ฒ ์ ์น์๊ธ์ ๊ธฐ๋ถํ๋ค๊ณ ์ฃผ์ฅํ๋ฉฐ, ์ด ๋๋ฌธ์ ๊ทธ๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์๋์ง ์์๋ค๊ณ ์ฐ๊ฒฐํ๋ค. ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ ์ ์๋ ์๋ค. ์ฃผ์ฅ 2 - ๊ณต๋งค๋/ํฉ์ฑ ๊ณต๋งค๋: ๋ค์ดํค๋ ์ผํ ์ด ์กด์ฌํ๋ค๋ ์ ์ฅ์ด๋ฉฐ, SEC์ ์์ํ๊ฐ ํค์งํ๋ ์๊ธ์ ๋ฐ๋ ์ดํด์ถฉ๋์ด ์๋ค๊ณ ๋น์ ํ๋ค(๊ต๋์ ๊ฐ์๊ฐ ์ฃ์์๊ฒ ์๊ธ์ ๋ฐ๋ ๊ฒ์ ๋น์ ). ์ฃผ์ฅ 3 - ๋ถ์ฑํ๋์ ๊ตญ์ฑ ๋ฐํ: ๋ถ์ฑํ๋ ํต๊ณผ ํ ์ฌ๋ฌด๋ถ๊ฐ ์์กฐ ๋ฌ๋ฌ์ ์ ๊ท ๊ตญ์ฑ๋ฅผ ๋ฐํํด์ผ ํ๋๋ฐ, ์ฃผ์์์ฅ์ด ์ ๊ณ ๊ฐ ํ์ง ์ค์ด๋ฉด ์ฑ๊ถ ์์๊ฐ ์์ด JP๋ชจ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋ธ๋๋ก์ด ์์ฅ์ ๋จ์ด๋จ๋ ค ์์๋ฅผ ๋ง๋ค ๊ฒ์ด๋ผ๋ ์ถ์ธก์ด ์ ์๋๋ค. ์ฃผ์ฅ 4 - ์ํ ์๊ธฐ: ๋ฐํด๋ ์ด์ฆ CEO ๋ฐ์ธ์ ์ธ์ฉํด ์ํ๋ค์ด ํฌํธํด๋ฆฌ์ค๋ฅผ ๋งค๊ฐํ๊ณ ๋์ถ์ ์ค์ฌ ์ฃผ์์์ฅ ์ถ๊ฐ ํ๋ฝ์ ์ ๋ฐํ ์ ์๋ค๊ณ ํ๋ฉฐ, ์ฐ์ค ์ ์ฉ ๋์ถ ์์ก์ด 3์ ์ดํ ๊ณ์ ๋๊ณ ์์ด ์ฒด๊ณ์ ์ํ์ด ์์ง ํด์๋์ง ์์๋ค๊ณ ์ฃผ์ฅํ๋ค. ์ฃผ์ฅ 5 - AMC: ๋ธ๋ฃธ๋ฒ๊ทธ ๊ธฐ์ฌ๊ฐ ๊ฐ์ธํฌ์์ ๋ฐ๋ ์ฌ๋ก ์ ๊ณผ์ฅํ๋ค๊ณ ๋นํํ๊ณ , ์ญ๋ถํ ์ฐฌ์ฑ 72% ํฌํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ก ์ ์ํ๋ค. AMC ๋งค๋ ๊ถ์ ์ฝํ ์ธ ๋ฅผ ์ด(shill)์ด๋ผ ๊ท์ ํ๊ณ ๋ฒ์ ์์ ์ถ์ฒ๋ฅผ ์ถ์ ํ์๊ณ ์ฃผ์ฅํ๋ค. ๋ฆฌ์คํฌ ๋ฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด: ์์ฅ ํญ๋ฝ ์์ ยทํญ๊ณผ ๋ชฉํ ๊ฐ๊ฒฉ์ ์ ์๋์ง ์์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ๋๋ถ๋ถ ์๋ชจ๋ก ์ ์ฐ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ํธ์ ์ธ์ฉ์ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ๋ค. ์ถ์ฐ์ ์ ๋ง: ์์ ์งํ์๋ ์์ฅ์ด '์ฌ์ ํ ํญ๋ฝํ ๊ฒ(will still crash)'์ด๋ผ๋ ์ ์ฅ์ด๋ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ๊ณผ ๋ชฉํ๋ ์ธ๊ธํ์ง ์์๋ค.
๋ค๋ฌ์ ๊ธ
today I want to talk about how Ken Griffin has just been caught bribing members of Congress I want to explain how he used this to his Advantage during the 2021 GameStop lawsuit but how the market is still going to crash as a result idnation so Chris Rose who's running for a position at the Senate tweeted saying why does it feel like I'm the only one running for office that's calling out the counterfeit or fraudulent shares practice that is known as naked shorting when will those already elected demand answers from Gary Gensler and the SEC I think Chris makes a great point with this tweet there are some people already in the Senate and others running for Senate positions that are currently calling for an investigation into synthetic short but obviously there are so many other politicians that let these crimes fly completely under the rug and ignore them at all instances but so why is there this disparity why is there some people in this Senate that I'll convince naked shorting absolutely does exist but others that think it's never happened and never could happen well as RJ tweeted he said it's because your colleagues profit from it and are actually paid by Wall Street thieves who profit off the backs of everyday Americans now the wolf has actually come with some receipts of exactly who in the Senate and who in Congress Ken Griffin has bribed Heath is saying obviously these people at the financial services committee will never call upon the SEC Gary Gensler or the Department of Justice to investigate such crimes and it's not just synthetic shorting spoofing and many more underhand tactics that are being used to destroy businesses and the retail investor this is that on February 18 2021 Ken Griffin testified before the house Financial Services committee to address his role in the GameStop controversy but it says that Ken Griffin has donated money directly to full Congress people that are actually on that committee and that were actually in that meeting and those four people included Republicans French Hill Andy Barr and Wagner and Bill wazenga so Ken Griffin has been donating money to these specific Republicans to obviously fund their campaign and likely their lavish Lifestyles as well and that's likely why Ken Griffin was not charged of any crimes during this 2021 GameStop lawsuit and why he continues to get away with lying to Congress to this very day it's because members of Congress are quite literally in Ken Griffin's back pocket and this is likely why there's not more people in the senate or at Congress that are calling out Ken Griffin's crimes and also while there's such a split of people that do think synthetic shorting exists and others that don't believe it does at all I do think there's definitely a conflict of interest in having the SEC and having members of this house of financial services committee effectively being funded by the hedge funds they're trying to regulate that's basically the equivalent to workers in the prison system effectively having their salaries paid by criminals and prisoners themselves there would obviously be a massive amount of bias in the way that prisoners are treated if the guards are effectively being paid by those very prisoners but bigham's tweeted he said get ready my friends because the market is still going to crash Financial answer while tweet is saying when the debt ceiling passes the treasury must create a market for trillions of dollars worth of new treasuries he said they can't do this with a stock market making new highs if the stock market is making new highs there's going to be very little appetite for trillions of dollars in new treasuries because obviously money will be deployed in the stock markets and not in the bonds and treasury markets so what does JPMorgan Chase and BlackRock have to do to create demand for these government treasuries they crash the market there has been some rumor of the debt ceiling deal potentially being soured at the last minute to effectively crash the market this will effectively be something that makes Joe Biden look even worse and effectively gives away for the government to issue these trillions of dollars in new treasury bills also guys be sure to sign up to move the sponsor of today's video by using the link down a whopping 15 free shares which is worth tons and tons of money MooMoo is also very easy to use it's very clear and concise and there's also entirely free commission free trading and funnily enough the CEO of Barclays is basically saying the exact same thing saying that banks will continue to tank the stock market the CEO of Barclays has said that banks will likely continue to tank the markets as Banks look to adjusting business models and selling portfolios to cure themselves basically these banks that are struggling are going to be selling off giant portions of stocks that they own of treasury bills of bonds and of mortgage portfolios as well anything to effectively get tied up money and assets out of the door and to get pure cash back in the door he added that the acute crisis has passed but that many banks will be forced to change their business models including possibly by curtailing lending he said I think as a systemic risk it's over but what's not been solved yet is what the funding model that will work going forward will actually look like many of these banks have a bigger asset problem than they would like so they're looking to sell portfolios and they're looking to cure themselves and what that will mean is less lending this part here about selling portfolios is effectively what's going to trigger the next leg down in the market crash if these banks have to sell off giant portions of their stock portfolios it's going to reduce those asset prices and also less lending means more price drops in amount markets and finance Lancelot has added by saying that it's actually a misconception that the banking crisis is over he said the two credit facilities created by the FED in March are actually still rising and he said that interbank lending is effectively reliant on fed interventions right now he said the banking system is not stable and they know it and that it wouldn't take much to push it back into chaos we can see that both the bank term funding program and also other credit extension facilities are actually still increasing and have been increasing since March of 2023.
these are obviously those new facilities that were created by the FED to effectively provide short-term financing to these Banks but it seems that this financing isn't really being too short-term and actually more money is being drawn down every single week so it seems the Barclays CEO may be right in saying that these banks have a bigger problem than they would like but wrong in saying that it's not a systemic risk because to me it still definitely looks like a systemic risk if these borrowing facilities have not only not reduced they've actually continued to get even larger now I also wanted to talk about a recent full article written by Bloomberg about AMC and how these shields may actually be exposed in core markets with May tweets saying seriously Bloomberg do you even fact check it's absolutely ridiculous she said Adam Aaron can you ask them to retract this nonsense Mike Leonard from Bloomberg wrote saying that most of the amateur investors have indicated they're against the reverse split although a majority of the relatively small number boating on the original conversion plan actually approved it in March before the settlement markets with me said did you even bother to look at the voting results or did you just take a poll and send it to the short sellers because obviously 72 percent of the common AMC shares represented voted yes ignoring those antara shares ignoring all of those eight votes 72 percent of AMC holders still voted yes and that's 72 percent clearly shows that the majority of voting shareholders approved the proposals and were for the reverse split and I think the reverse split as a whole has really gone further to expose the AMC Shields because you can basically summarize the AMC shields in a nutshell in these four photos these shields cry that AMC is tanking and say that you need to sell your shares because it screws already and for some reason these shields care about your money and want you to sell these shows are trying to convince you the price will likely Fall further and that you might as well just sell your shares now because the squeeze already happened but again all this really does is expose those shields for the shills that they are trying to convince you to make investing decisions that they're providing to you AKA trying to convince you to celebrate shares but interestingly as Travis tweeted he said all judges earn has to do is cross correlate all the letters and find out the source of how these people are getting their false information and then just subpoena those who are spreading false information or who the main sources are for that false information and throw the book at them or have them sing about their connections all these shields are obviously getting their fired from somewhere so all you need to do is go to the source and find out who that source is working for and that will be a brilliant way to expose these shields in court and find out exactly who's paying them to Shilling







Comments 0